Mr K Shanmugam, Minister of Home Affairs and Law.

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam said in Parliament on Monday (6 May) that Mr Nicholas Lim, the National University of Singapore (NUS) student who secretly filmed a fellow student, Monica Baey, while showering in the hostel, is “on thin ice” after he was given a 12-month conditional warning by the police.

Last month, Ms Baey took to her Instragram account to call out to NUS for trying to protect Mr Lim after he conducted such a horrible act. This is because Mr Lim was only given conditional warning from the police, and one-month suspension from NUS along with an apology letter addressed to Ms Baey.

Speaking on this case. Mr Shanmugam agrees that there were factors which could have justified in charging the offender – the main one being he had committed something “very wrong”.

However, after these factors were weighed against other factors, it was justified giving Mr Lim another chance. “Police weighed both sets of factors, and decided that a conditional warning was appropriate,” said the Law Minister.

He added, “It was one of those cases, quite usual for the police, where the decision was based on judgment. Police accessed him to be remorseful and likely to reform. He confessed voluntarily, within minutes of the offence being committed, and well before any police report was made. He was cooperative with the police. He had not circulated the video. It had been deleted. Other factors have also been mentioned in the police statement”.

However, Mr Shanmugam noted that if Mr Lim re-offend in the next 12 months, he will then be “charged for the offence related to Ms Baey, as well as the new offence”.

No free passes for anyone

The Ministry of Education (MOE) had mentioned in Parliament that between the academic years of 2015/2016 and 2017/2019, a total of 56 sexual misconduct cases were reported to the autonomous universities. Out of these 56 cases, 37 were forwarded to the police, said Mr Shanmugam.

The Minister added that in the 31 cases that had been brought up to the police, 16 were prosecuted in court, with a jail sentence for 10 of them. As for the remaining 15 cases, 13 perpetrators were handed a conditional warning, while two were given stern warnings.

But, for one NUS student, he was sentenced to eight months imprisonment and fined S$2,000, after he re-offended in 2017. He had earlier, in 2015, been given a conditional warning for a voyeurism offence.

Therefore, the Minister said that there were no “free passes” for anyone.

“So these numbers show that some have been prosecuted depending on the facts, others have been given a second chance, and there are no ‘free passes’ to university students, or anyone else,” said Mr Shanmugam.

He added, “All of this, being tough, taking a no nonsense approach – does not mean that every offender must be or will be automatically charged in court. Police and (the) AGC must look at the facts of each case and exercise discretion”.

Handling sexual misconduct cases

Mr Shanmugam noted that assessment of future conduct and the probability of rehabilitation were important considerations when it comes to sexual misconduct offences.

“The police will look at all the factors, including the level of remorse, whether he owned up voluntarily, and the likelihood of reform, and the likelihood of re-offending. They will also of course consider the circumstances of the victim, the impact of the offence on the victim, and the need for deterrence,” explained the Law Minister.

But generally, he noted that the police will show no leniency if there are other aggravating factors like previous conviction or being warned for similar offences.

“We take a very stern view of sexual misconduct. Several perpetrators have been prosecuted and put behind bars. But the rigid meting out of uniform penalties will not serve the wider public interest,” said Mr Shanmugam.

Hearing his explanation, many netizens were not at all convinced on why Mr Lim was slapped with just a 12-month conditional warning. Given that Mr Lim was not a minor, some questioned why the sentence was so light as there should not be any pardoning when it comes to sexual misconduct. As such, there wonder if the government has two ways of handing such cases? If that is not all, they also said that the next generation “needs to be taught right, not light”.

 

Penning down their comments on the Facebook pages of Channel NewsAsia and Mothership, online users said that giving such leniency for the act can cause female students to feel unsafe, and probably encourage “potential first offenders”. Some said that the laws are being twisted and bent as certain less serious offences were given harsher punishments, while serious crimes were given mere conditional warning.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

圣诞老人才是选民心目中挑战执政党的理想人选?

撰文:许渊臣  北雁译 对于我国在野政党,普遍新加坡选民的抱怨都是,这些政党和候选人,都不是他们理想中的政党和政治人物类型。要么是觉得他们做得不够好、格局不够高、不常出现在选区,又或者他们提出的改革体制建议不够实际。 且不论这些选民的抱怨是否属实,让我们先来看看当今新加坡的政治环境。 大部分新加坡人都不会花钱资助那些政治事业或推动改革的政党(即便符合选民期许的改革) 大部分(即便不是全部)新加坡企业都受惠于政联公司或与之有关的机构如职总平价合作社 《经济学人》发表的2016年全球朋党资本主义指数(crony-capitalism index)排名,新加坡位居第四 对于那些被体制惩罚的人,很少有国人伸出援手。更甭论那些在香港、台湾和其他民主国家, 愿意为不公站在一起的公民 对于人民行动党派钱,特别是在大选之年,大部分国民感到感激,即便这些津贴援助,都是来自政府资源,而不是来自政党。 所以,如果选民的抱怨真得有道理,那么他们理想中的政党和政治人物(先不论政治意识形态)应该:…

MOM: New scheme allows Chinese work pass holders to switch jobs within sectors

Beginning from next Monday (2 March), Chinese work pass holders in services…

【武汉冠状病毒】病毒空气中可存活半小时 中国专家:传染范围达4.5米

中国政府流行病学家发现,武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)病菌能够在空中徘徊至少30分钟,可传播至4.5米远,比世界卫生组织所建议的“安全距离”还要远。 研究员还发现,病菌可以透过呼吸飞沫降落到表面后存活数天,如果有不知情人触碰了后擦拭到脸部和手上,就还会增加传播风险。 报告指出,病菌在表面上存活的时间长短取决于温度和物件表面类型等因素,比如在玻璃、布料、金属、塑料或纸张上,在37摄氏的温度下,病菌可存活两至三天。 有关的研究报告来自湖南省的一组官方研究员,根据一起集群病例所进行的研究结果,并挑战世卫组织所提出的安全距离,即人们应该保持一至两米(三至六英尺半)。 建议常洗手和全程戴口罩 研究员于上周五在医药杂志《实用预防医学》(Practical Preventive Medicine)上发表了一篇论文,写到:“可以确定的是,在装有冷气(空调)的封闭环境中,冠毒病菌的传播距离将超过公认的安全距离”。 论文中还强调,即使在病原体(带菌人)离开了巴士,病菌仍然可能漂浮在巴士内。 研究员警告说,冠毒病菌也能在人的粪便或体液内存活超过五天。 他们说,这项研究证明了人们在公共场所洗手和戴口罩的重要性,因为病菌会在空气中徘徊,停留在细小液滴颗粒上。“我们的建议是,在乘坐巴士的路途中,始终戴着口罩。” 依巴士传染病例展开研究…