Secretary General of the Reform Party, Kenneth Jeyaretnam pointed out that the top management of fact-checking company Black Dot is made up of PAP hardcores.

Following the blog post by former TNP editor Bertha Henson on her blog Bertha Harian about the events that unfolded around the time of the 1997 General elections when The New Paper ran a story on their front page about police reports filed against PAP ministers by Worker’s Party politicians Tan Liang Hong and JB Jeyaretnam.

The story alleged collusion and political manipulation which resulted in both Mr Tang and Mr Jeyaretnam facing down massive legal suits which ended up with the former fleeing abroad and the latter being declared bankrupt.

Kenneth Jeyaretnam pointed out in an article on his website that after Ms Henson published her story, Black Dot was brought in to ‘shut down’ her confession and Mr Jeyaretnam’s statement in response as they are likely to cause a ‘siesmic shift in public perception’. Mr Jeyaretnam was referring to the organisations mission statement which says they “verify claims made from any source that could potentially cause a seismic shift in public perception on topics of general importance in Singapore.”

Black Dot – which Mr Jeyaretnam describes as ‘shadowy’ – and their involvement in this particular story shows that PAP is ‘running scared’ says Mr Jeyaretnam. While Black Dot claims to be “entirely self-funded and unconnected to any third-party organisation, political, government or otherwise”, Mr Jeyaretnam notes that they appear to actually function as “the government’s damage control unit”.

He said, “Black Dot group are far from ‘independent’”.

Not as independent as they claim to be

He makes the connection between the media organisation and political party by highlighting the connections that Black Dot’s leadership team has to the government

He pointed out that the Managing Director of the company, Nicholas Fang, was formerly attached to Sate Times and Channel NewsAsia, both under Mediacorp which is owned by the Temasek which is in turn owned by the government. He was there for 15 years before becoming an Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP).

Next, the Executive Director of Black Dot is Jeffrey Fang, a former Director of Strategic and Public Affairs at Temasek. The Senior Researcher is Kevin Tan who was an SAF officer for 17 years while the lead fact checker, Derek Low, was a captain in the SAF before working as a litigator for the PAP’s ‘preferred defamation lawyers’ Drew & Napier.

Mr Jeyaretnam says, “Yet again we are shown proof positive that the PM has absolute power and that every institution in Singapore, from the police force to the media, is at his command to crush all opposition to his rule and to further his and his family’s financial interests.”

He adds that he isn’t worried about the involvement of the government via Black Dot, noting that Bertha’s story exposes the PAP’s ‘horrifically corrupt government’.

Highlighting that it would be ‘interesting’ to see who Black Dot’s top 5 clients, Mr Jeyaretnam says, “in the absence of even partial disclosure a background in state media and working for Temasek and the military is about as close as one can get in Singapore to a direct PAP connection”.

He adds, “As they manage damage to the government their clients must be the government”

Mr Jeyaretnam goes on to say that this entire saga reveals just how far the government will go “to bring down anyone who threatens the family power of the Lees”, and in this case it was his father, JB Jeyaretnam. He emphasised that this is further proof that the PM has ‘absolute power’ over institutions in Singapore, from the police force to the media – all of whom are at ready to ‘crush all opposition to his rule’ and further the financial interest of his family.

Going further, Mr Jeyaretnam compares Singapore to that of a third world totalitarian state, stressing that this kind of evidence of collusion between the PM, police, and media would not go unpunished in any other country.

Does the public even notice?

Turning his attention to the public now, Mr Jeyaretnam questions if the community even realises what is happening. He notes, “No one has ever sued the Police force before. But we’re not going to get an enquiry or independent investigation,” asking is there’s a lawyer brave enough to take on the administration.

Mr Jeyaretnam then talked about the additions Ms Henson made on her post several days after posting which included an excerpt of the Court of Appeal judgement in the case against JB Jeyaretnam. Mr Jeyaretnam says, “I suppose she wanted to pose as one of Singapore’s soft liberals and a martyr. She failed.”

He added that Ms Henson hasn’t informed him before publishing her post and that he was astonished to recall that she had attended his father’s wake.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理儿子李毅鹏搭车被偷拍 警方调查司机

针对网络流传,总理长子李毅鹏乘坐私家车时被偷拍的视频,新加坡警方证实已接获报案,目前有关疑涉偷拍的31岁司机正接受调查。 有关三则视频分别显示,李毅鹏在等候德士,司机则询问他的名字和确认他是否是总理儿子。而后司机似乎邀李毅鹏上车,并载他一程。对话中司机也再次询问他的名字和总理的关系。 司机好奇怎么李毅鹏一人外出没有随扈,也问要去哪,后者表示放他在东陵路下车,他可以走路返家。司机则询问是不是因为那里保安森严,而那里的人是否能认得出他。 在闲聊中李毅鹏则表示对于透露自己的私人生活不是很舒服,司机也不再追问。而后话题则转移到李毅鹏收集唱片的兴趣。过程中李毅鹏似乎不知司机正在录视频。 警方表示,需要寻求有关司机协助调查,是因为基于李毅鹏的身份背景,司机的提问有严重的安全顾虑。 根据警方声明,指这名司机曾在2014年,在没有获取车主同意,以及在没有购买保险的情况下取走并驾驶车辆,而被定罪。此外,曾因涉入屋行窃被警方警告。 “假账号”冒充总理要司机现身 另一方面,网络也流传一则照片,照片中疑似冒充总理的脸书账号,表示总理正寻找再送其儿子返家的司机,并要求后者前往邻近警局报到。 警方已证实该照片是假的,并对此调查一名39岁男子。 总理新闻秘书则表示,总理对长子李毅鹏被偷拍的事件知情。并指出弱势群体应能安全出外,不被骚扰或侵犯他们隐私。 由于事件仍处于调查阶段,李总理将不会对事件进一步置评,并感谢关心这起事件的公众。

Lee Weiling presents email which contradicts PM Lee's statutory declaration to Ministerial Committee

Dr Lee Weiling has released an email from Janadas Devan, Chief of…

Yellow Ribbon Project Singapore disallowed participant from running in Prison Run 2019 when he appeared in an anti-death penalty t-shirt

On 15 September (Sunday), Mohammad Nafiz Kamarudin, founder of non-profit organisation Happy…

Bears, bikes and baby-cuddlers – snapshots of opposition walkabout

Photos by Benjamin Cheah, Jewel Philemon,  Jeremy Philemon and Joshua Chiang Extra…