Singapore’s Soh Rui Yong catching up to Thailand’s Boonthung Srisung at the final leg of the 2015 SEA marathon. (Image from RunSohFast.com)

National long-distance runner, Soh Rui Yong, was asked via legal letter by the Singapore National Olympic Council to withdraw his account of the 2015 SEA Games Marathon and issue an apology by 5pm today (9 April).

The article in question, titled “2015 SEA Games Marathon – In My Words” was published on 22 June 2015 (updated in 2018) on Mr Soh’s own website, RunSohFast. In it, the two time SEA gold medallist gave a blow-by-blow account of his first gold medal win at the SEA Games Marathon 4 years ago, detailing the entire experience from the time he woke up to the entire race, one mile at a time.

In his account, Mr Soh described how just after the 5km mark – where he was near the front of the pack – there was an unexpected wrong turn. In his own words, Mr Soh said:

Coming up to what I had expected to be a U-turn point, I looked out for signs, arrows, something to indicated that we had to turn. All we saw was a bunch of marshals gathered together, but not aware that we were fast approaching. We went straight by them, and were only stopped by their yells and screams, “WRONG WAY! COME BACK!!” We all turned, and the balance of power shifted. The leaders, who were further ahead on the wrong route than everyone else, were now at the back of the pack, and the chase pack now found themselves up ahead. Teammate Ashley who had been in last place up to this point, ended up in front as we all did an about turn. Nobody slowed down to wait – the race was on.

He then described feeling angry at the turn of events but managing to level his head to focus on the mammoth task at hand. The article goes on to describe Mr Soh’s journey as he pushed hard and slowly made his way back to the front of the pack, pulling ahead from the other runners and eventually going head to head for the gold against Thailand’s Boonthung Srisung who was a 10 time SEA Games medalist in the 5,000m and 10,000m events.

Now, it’s worth noting again that this post by Mr Soh was made back in 2015. According to Mr Soh, the SNOC sent a letter to Mr Soh via their solicitors last week demanding that he take the post down and issue and apology.

In his Facebook post about the demand, Mr Soh said, “I will not back down from the truth”. He added that he had submitted a response to SNOC via his solicitors.

Mr Soh the suggested that “all of Singapore sports would be betters served if the SNOC chose to engage in dialogue with all parties involved instead of continuing to spend public resources on legal means”.

He added that as a public organisation, the SNOC should be fair to all parties even when opinions may differ. Mr Soh said, “It is more constructive to find solutions to issues as opposed to sending legal letters, which are a waste of resources better used through supporting our athletes.”

“Singapore and Singaporeans are watching”, he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公民齐聚发声 关注《防假消息法》对公民社会影响

一群志同道合的公民,在今日下午3时许齐聚芳林公园,对政府即将推行的《防止网络假消息及网络操纵》法案,表达他们的关注,活动获得不俗相应,圆满成功。 上述活动是由本社、公民组织:功能八号氏族会、社区行动网络(CAN)和“尊严”(MARUAH)联合召集主办。由关汝经主持此次聚会。 活跃社运分子、也是功能八号成员的陈慧娴,还是四个孙子阿嬷的到地新加坡人。她认为,公民必须对防假消息法表达立场,要让公民和政府之间建立信任感,就应把草案撤除。 她在以中文致词时,以“狼来了”和“三只小猪”的故事,揶揄政府辩称新加坡人发表的不可信,所以要推行该法,大喊“狼来了”。 至于三只小猪中,用砖墙建的小屋屹立不倒,如同政府必须信赖人民、有信任感,才可以建设稳健、平等的国家社会。 时评人梁实轩质疑政府究竟在惧怕什么?他指的是政府在组屋、退休年龄、医疗健保和失业率问题上,还有很多该回答的疑问。 例如人民要动用近半的公积金储备买公共组屋,但是到最后组屋屋契到期房价将归零;同时直到近年才告知组屋价格也纳入土地价格因素。 至于学者、《自我审查:新加坡耻辱》的作者高梅兹则直言,根据他走访东南亚其他国家的经验,推行防假消息法等审查法令的国家,只会造成虚伪的选举。 要推行防假消息法,政府通常会提出理由:在多元社会需维护社会和谐、担忧政府信任遭影响、还有外国势力的影响。他提出通常是为了对付三种情况:对付小道消息、预防多元社会内的不良情绪、还有保护当权者和朋党。 但高梅兹也警告,防假消息法带来的深远影响远超过自我审查,甚至会影响媒体、个人、公民社会的言论自由都会被拖累,特别是独立网络媒体。一些政府是假新闻制造者,可以拿法律来对付异议分子,但自己则不受法律审断。 政治工作者毕博渊则提醒,防假消息法其中的C61条文,还可以赋予当权者,豁免特定人士受该法制裁。 对比早期人民对行动党领袖的信任,再对比如今就可知差别,如今更多是花言巧语。而他提到,在印尼是人民自己组织打击网络假新闻,而马来西亚还打算废除掉防假新闻法。…

How far should MPs go for a cause?

In the last six months, Member of Parliament for Moulmein-Kallang GRC, Denise…

EU Parliamentarians asks Singapore for a gesture of goodwill regarding Jolovan Wham’s case, Singapore says no

On 10th January, a member of the European Parliament Jude Kirton-Darling wrote…