Singapore’s Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and Malaysia’s Foreign Affairs Minister Saifuddin Abdullah at a joint press conference in Putrajaya on Thursday (Source: Today Online/Faris Mokhtar).

Governments of Malaysia and Singapore have agreed to revert to their original port limits after both governments agreed to suspend the previous extensions of their port limits within a month from Thursday (March 14).

Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia Dato’ Saifuddin Abdullah and Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Singapore Dr Vivian Balakrishnan met in Putrajaya, Malaysia on 14 March 2019 in a follow-up meeting from their previous meeting in Singapore on 8 January 2019 where both Ministers outlined their commitment to resolve the maritime issues surrounding the port limits of both our countries.

In a press release on Thursday, the ministry said that the Ministers discussed the Working Group’s report on maritime issues surrounding the overlapping Johor Bahru Port Limits off Tanjung Piai and Singapore Port Limits off Tuas.

The report was submitted by the Working Group headed by the Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia, Dato’ Sri Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Singapore, Mr Chee Wee Kiong.

The ministers agreed that Malaysia and Singapore shall implement five recommendations in the report with effect from 14 March 2019, including to revert to their original port limits.

The ministers also agreed not to authorise and to suspend all commercial activities in the area, not to anchor any government vessels in the area, vessels of both countries will operate in the area based on international law including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The last recommendation is that both sides will set up a joint committee chaired by the permanent secretary of Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Chee Wee Kiong and Malaysia’s foreign ministry secretary-general Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob.

It is said that these measures taken by both countries shall be without prejudice to Malaysia’s and Singapore’s respective maritime boundary claims in the area.

“In the event that the committee is unable to reach an amicable solution on delimitation, Malaysia and Singapore may mutually agree to resort to an appropriate international third-party dispute settlement procedure on terms to be mutually agreed by the parties,” the ministries said.

Both ministers are said to have agreed that these measures were vital to de-escalate the situation on the ground and pave the way for maritime boundary delimitation of the area.

The ministry also said that these measures also demonstrate the commitment of both countries to work together to preserve a strong and positive bilateral relationship on the basis of equality and mutual respect and to resolve bilateral issues amicably in accordance with international law.

In a joint press conference in Putrajaya alongside his Malaysian counterpart, Dr Balakrishnan stated that both sides have differing views on the right to review water prices, saying, “Both of us have agreed that the Attorneys-General of Malaysia and Singapore will continue their discussions to better understand each other’s positions on the right to review the price of water under the 1962 agreement.”

While Dato’ Saifuddin said, “We also reaffirmed our commitment to resolve bilateral issues in a constructive manner and encourage ongoing diplomacy efforts to find an amicable solution.”

Earlier on Wednesday, a ministry’s spokesperson stressed that Singapore has been clear and consistent that its position is that Malaysia has lost the right to review the price of water under the 1962 Water Agreement.

The ministry stated that during the meeting between Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad on 12 November 2018, both sides expressed their differing views on the right to review the price of water under the 62WA.

The Attorneys-General of Singapore and Malaysia also met once in December 2018 for this purpose. However, their discussions did not make progress as they were overshadowed by the issues that had arisen over the Johor Bahru Port Limits and the Seletar Instrument Landing System (ILS) procedures.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

黄鲁胜谈巴蒂案 坦言民众对总检察署信心动摇

大法官梅达顺今早在司法年开幕礼尚指出,司法界一直致力于委任具有能力与诚信的人选担任法官,但法官也会有犯错的时候,因此为司法体系设有上诉程序与其他机制,以纠正可能性的失误。 受到冠病疫情影响下,今年的司法年开幕礼有别以往的安排,从原有的高等法院大厦礼堂改为国家法院大厦礼堂举行,并首次以网络视讯会议进行开幕礼直播。 为能控管出席人数,现场高庭法官人数也减半,另一半则透过视讯参加开幕礼。而由于是透过网上举行,开幕礼嘉宾反而不受限,人数达到近千人,在开幕礼尚致辞的大法官与总检察长黄鲁胜,先后提及去年轰动一时的“前女佣巴蒂案”。 黄鲁胜指出,尽管巴蒂案并非首个备受瞩目的脱罪案,但民众却因此对总检察署的信心有所动摇。 因此,他也向国人保证,总检察署的一切决定,将以民众利益为最重要考量。主控官并不是“不惜一切”将被告入罪,而是协助法庭采取公正与公平的裁决。 黄鲁胜称,2020年对于总检察署“充满挑战”也不完美,他指出包括巴蒂案在内的案件,也不是历史上首次有高调的无罪释放案例。然而,公众对总检察署的信心却为之动摇。他强调总检察署严正看待此事。 大法官也呼吁公众切勿急着作出判断,将司法程序中的失误,视为带有恶意的失当行为。 大法官也强调,法官与主控官在执行职务时,绝不考虑任何商业利益。

指时事专页贴文内容不实 卫生部援引“泼马”发更正指示

卫生部今日(14日)援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),透过防假消息法办公处对时事脸书专页State Times Review(STR)的管理人陈智祥(Alex Tan),发出更正指示。 同时,脸书也接获当局发出针对性更正指示( Targeted Correction Direction)。 这已是上述专页管理人第二次领到来自新加坡政府部门的更正指示。去年11月28日,内政部也同样援引《防假消息法》,要求前者更正贴文。 当局指上述脸书专页在昨日(13日)的帖文中作出多个不实指控,例如指政府无法追踪病患感染源、政府是“唯一一个”告诉人民不必戴口罩的单位、“中国客工”可在14日缺席假期间,从政府那里领到每日100元的津贴、人力部长杨莉明努力从中国引进更多劳工;以及七个国家限制到新加坡理由,因对我国公共卫生措施缺乏信心。 已厘清其中51病患的关联 对此当局驳斥,截至13日中午12时,在58起确诊病例中,已确认其中51起病患是否去过中国,或厘清和此前病例的关联。…

Josephine Teo: Jobs Support Scheme helps to prevent unemployment rate or retrenchments to spike

In its labour market report for the first quarter, the Ministry of…

S’pore’s thirst for sand again in the news

A Myanmar news outlet has reported that the country’s export of sand…