Mr Tan Chuan Jin in Parliament

Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin said that he agrees with the judgment call by Ministry of Health (MOH) to not inform patients and public about the HIV data leak.

On Tuesday (12 February), Health Minister Gan Kim Yong defended his ministry in Parliament in the aftermath of the HIV data leak incident and rejected any allegations that the MOH sought to “cover up the incident”.

Mr Tan who as Speaker, listened closely to what the Health Minister said, felt that it was the right move by MOH to not make the news of the data leak public earlier. He revealed this on his Facebook page on Wednesday (13 February).

“When the news broke recently, we could all see the distress and anguish it caused HIV patients. This would have been exactly what they would experience had it been made public earlier. However, at that stage, it was not apparent to MOH that there would be so extensive a leak. Those that had been impacted then were informed. MOH’s judgement then was not to alarm everyone when the threat as we know it now, was not as clear,” he explained.

He added, “My personal guess is also that before a real threat was clear, perhaps one shouldn’t trigger any untoward reactions and make it a self-fulfilling event.”

Last month, the ministry revealed that the HIV-positive status of 14,200 people, along with confidential information such as their identification numbers and contact details, were leaked online by US citizen Mikhy K Farrera Brochez. MOH added that the access to the information was disabled and it is working with other parties to scan the Internet for further disclosures.

In his post, Mr Tan turned the table and asked the public what would they do given the facts and situation. “Announce when it wasn’t clear that the threat was quite so significant, and trigger the anguish and stress? Or try and manage it to ensure the sensitive info is not leaked but always knowing that if it does, that’s when you announce publicly and try and help those affected,” he questioned.

Although he agrees with the judgment call, but he also noted that follow-up steps to tighten protocols to ensure that this doesn’t occur again is critical.

After he published his post, some netizens disagreed with his stand and said that it was indeed MOH’s duty to inform the public of the data leak earlier.

Contrary to Tan’s stand on MOH’s judgement call, businessman Lim Jialing has a different opinion altogether. In his Facebook page, he jokingly said that “when committing corporate fraud and caught, we can now rely on Gan Kim Yong defence.” As an example, he wrote, “It was a judgment call by our c-suite not to go public about our massive losses so as to not alarm our shareholders.”

Now, it’s would be interesting to know if Tan agrees with Lim that this is what people should imitate if they’re caught in a similar situation.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Malaysian government has remitted ‘abortive costs’ for HSR postponement

The Singapore government has announced on Thursday (31 January) that it has received…

“临时”了60年的刑事法(临时条款)

撰文:人权律师M.Ravi  翻译:北雁 刑事法(临时条款)(CLTPA)被“临时”延长了六十年,还算是临时条款吗?该法在1955年颁布,就连名称本身都用词不当,新加坡人又再一次被愚弄了。 我们知道,该法赋权部长,未经审讯,就可下令拘留嫌犯。这原本是殖民时代的产物,是为了对应那个时代危机的临时措施。 然而,即便国家独立后,法令还沿用至今,新加坡可说是全球唯一,把一项“临时措施”保留了超过半世纪的国家。 而最近的刑事法(临时条款)修正法案,则针对部长拘留权限附加以下条款: “针对第(1)分款【拘留令和警察监视】事项,部长的所有决策均为最终决定。” 我已经说过,让部长干预警方执法的角色,很危险。上述条文也把司法机构审查任何拘留案件的权限,排除在外,使得透过司法程序挑战变得极为困难。 简言之,就是压迫基本权利,司法机构也无法、甚至对于审查有关拘捕或警察监视令是否公正,无法起作用。 在我执业期间,曾遇过一些个案、有者年仅19岁,声称自己无辜且被人诬陷。即便辩护他们的证据很无力,但却因为类似上述的法令,他们甚至连在法庭面对审判的机会都没有。 我们既然已经有针对高利贷和私会党活动制定了严法,这种“临时”措施,就不应再扩大并延伸到更广泛的犯罪行为。 刑事法(临时条款)近期的修法,…

Filipino nurse from SPH-owned nursing home jailed for punching 77-year-old resident’s face multiple times

A Filipino nurse, Bernardo JR Perdido Ramos, was sentenced to 12 weeks’…

84-year-old Singaporean becomes 12th COVID-19 fatality; cases surge past 10,000 mark

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has reported the country’s 12th COVID-19 death…