The losing candidate from People’s Action Party from GE2015, Lee Hong Chuang, informed the public through his Facebook page that he distributed food rations and red packets to the poor at the Poh Teck Siang temple in Hougang on Tue (5 Feb).

He said he was there to wish them “a prosperous Chinese New Year”.

(Photos from Lee Hong Chuang’s Facebook page)

In 2015 GE, PAP sent IBM senior IT manager, Lee Hong Chuang, to contest in Hougang SMC against WP candidate Png Eng Huat.

At the time, referring to WP MP Png Eng Huat, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said, “We want to tell Hougang voters that their current MP is not serving them as well as he could or should, whether in the town council or in Parliament. Hong Chuang, backed by the PAP, can do much better.”

Despite Lee Hong Chuang has been an active PAP grassroots leader in Hougang, Mr Png beat him in the 2015 GE to become the official MP for Hougang.

However, even though Mr Png is the MP for Hougang, he cannot tap onto the resources of People’s Association (PA), which is funded by the public, to help the residents of Hougang. PAP’s losing candidate Lee Hong Chuang, however, is allowed to. This is because he was installed as the Hougang’s grassroots adviser by the PAP government, even though he lost in 2015 GE.

Given the goodie bags given out to the elderlies states Poh Teck Siang temple, it is uncertain whether Mr Lee financed the distribution or simply there for publicity purposes.

Chan: PAP grassroots advisers to guide PA

Last year, Minister Chan Chun Sing explained in Parliament that grassroots advisers are appointed by the government to guide PA grassroots organisations so as to “promote social cohesion and to connect people and government”.

PA is meant to support the elected government in implementing its policies and programmes, Chan said. The PA also explains and gathers feedback on government policies so that “we can be a responsive and responsible government” he added.

Hence, grassroots advisers are appointed to guide PA grassroots organisations in carrying out this mission.

CPIB investigates crematorium workers and funeral directors for receiving red packets

Speaking of red packets, last week (1 Feb), the media reported that funeral business and crematorium workers have been questioned by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) for accepting red packets. Some were released on bail after questioning.

NEA, which runs the Mandai Crematorium, accused some of the workers for allegedly accepting red packets from funeral directors during work. “NEA takes a serious view of these allegations and immediately reported the matter to the Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau (CPIB) for their follow-up,” said a spokesman.

However, some industry insiders wondered why investigations are happening now, as such practice has been happening for decades, and the funeral directors were merely passing the red packets to workers on behalf of families.

Bereaved families do voluntarily give such packets, as it is seen as an auspicious gesture to “bless” the workers with good luck, funeral directors told the media. Generally, families give sums ranging from $2 to $50.

The funeral directors told reporters that they do not prompt the families to give the red packets, and some of them give without even asking. In addition, funeral directors do not receive any benefits from passing these packets to the crematorium workers, and there is no preferential treatment given to those who do so, they added.

“The whole process of cremation is very systematic. It’s not as though by giving them an ‘ang pow’, we will get better times (for cremation) or better treatment,” said a funeral director.

Many netizens are perplexed why the government is investigating such mundane matters as it was the families’ way of appreciating the workers and they’re giving out red packets out of goodwill.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

North Korea flouting nuclear sanctions: UN report

North Korea is violating international sanctions aimed at curbing its nuclear programme…

遭林瑞莲诘问 王瑞杰一度要求休会

昨日(5日),经过超过四个小时的辩论,国会通过副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰的动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。 九位工人党议员反对动议,至于官委议员王丽婷及特斯拉博士投下弃权票。但有52位议员投票赞同。 王瑞杰在以中文发言时强调“诚信是最重要的”,也多次引述高庭对林瑞莲等各造的宣判,指他们在理阿裕尼—后港市镇会事务上行为“不诚实”、“不透明”,违反受托责任。 对此,工人党主席林瑞莲在辩论时要求王瑞杰澄清数点指控,“副总理提到数以百万“不见了”,我的问题是,这是法庭以外的调查发现吗?还是这是一项指控?”。 而副总理则再次引述法庭判决,当中涉及数百万元的合约;但随即又再翻查手中档案,表示待会再针对此点回应。 林瑞莲也提到,王瑞杰一再指他们对审计方隐瞒资料;王瑞杰则质问有关委任FMSS公司的决策和相关资料,以及当事者是否刻意隐瞒此事。 林瑞莲针对有关诉讼,向国会报告,他们将对有关市镇会诉讼判决提出上诉,且截止日是在下周一(11日),故此王瑞杰的动议似乎“言之过早”。 林瑞莲强调,这是民事诉讼,无论高庭做出了何种判决,仍可由上诉庭再次审核;而这项动议似乎在诉讼还未有最终结果的情况下,阻止他们履行他们的职责。 她提醒不满判决一方有一个月期限可提出上诉。她也指出,他们仍在和律师研究有关判决,要求议员们拒绝王瑞杰的动议。 王瑞杰曾要求暂时休会;毕丹星立即站起来说,国会待会三点才休息,所以理应可以继续,不需要休会。但王瑞杰表示需要休会以便仔细研究如何更好地回应林瑞莲的提问。议长陈川仁则同意休会10分钟。

Mas Selamat captured – all thanks to the ISD!

Malaysia cleans up the mess – S’pore takes the credit. Gerald Giam.

111 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 106 locally transmitted cases, 25 unlinked

As of Monday noon (2 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…