Aircrafts at Chubu Centrair International Airport (Photo by Lee Yiu Tung /Shutterstock.com)

Japan has introduced a departure tax for people leaving the country from 7 Jan onward. The country will start collecting the tax of ¥1,000 (S$12.50) per person leaving the country by aircraft of shift regardless of their nationality.

The law, which was enacted in April last year, will see a levy being imposed on travellers on top of their airfare, ship fare, and travel fees.

With the number of visitors to Japan soaring in recent years, reaching 30 million in 2018, it’s estimated that the levy will generate about ¥6 billion (S$74 million) in the fiscal year 2018 to March 2019 and ¥50 billion (S$624 million) in the fiscal year 2019.

This revenue will be used develop the country’s tourism bases and improve immigration procedures. Specifically, the funds will be used to set up facial recognition gates at airports, multilingual information boards, and cashless payment terminals for public transportation.

Only people who are leaving Japan within 24 hours of their arrival and children under 2 years of age will be exempted from this departure tax. Also, flight tickets to Japan purchased and issued before 7th Jan 2019 will also be exempted.

Initial reaction has been one of concern. One argument is that visitors are already spending money in Japan during their time there, so many see this tax as a way for Japan to milk visitors out of more money.

The thing is, departure tax is not a new concept. In fact, many countries already have such a levy in place under different names. In Malaysia, it used to be called the ‘airport tax’ which has been renamed ‘Passenger Service Charge’. In Australia it’s called the Passenger Movement Charge while in the UK it’s called Air Passenger Duty (specifically for those travelling by air).

Netizens in Singapore have pointed out that the Japanese departure tax of approximately S$12.50 is actually quite a small sum. You probably won’t even notice the difference as the charge will be include in your overall ticket price.

In fact, netizens have said that this amount is nothing compared to the levy charged by Singapore on its travellers to fund the new Change Terminal 5.

The Transport Ministry and Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) announced in February that passengers beginning their trips from Changi Airport will now have to pay a levy of S$10.80 per person. On top of that, the Passenger Service and Security Fee was increased by S$2.30 on 1 July 2018 and will do so again every year until 2024 to fund the new terminal.

Unfortunately for Singapore, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) strongly objected against the attempt to charge travellers to help fund the construction of the new Terminal 5. The IATA stressed that it is ‘strongly against any pre-financing of any infrastructure’.

So in Singapore, all these charges combined means that passengers travelling via Changi Airport will have to pay a total of S$47.30 in airport fees until the next increase in April 2019. That is significantly higher than Japan’s new departure tax of only S$12.50.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nurse allegedly injects woman with wrong medication causing dehydration at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, netizens furious and urge hospital to be sued

On 22 June (Saturday), a concerned son named Cheong CT took to…

剖析《防假消息法》附属条例 是否回应了各界对法案权限的忧虑?

本月2日起,已经公布于宪报的《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》正式生效。该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 根据政府电子宪报上的通告,尚有其他数个《防假消息法》附属条例也一并发布宪报,包括上诉程序细节、媒体巨头、网络中介的规范等等,以及给与他们时间进行必要的调整,以符合《防假消息法》的条规。 事实上,《防假消息法》草案刚出台,即遭到各界挞伐,提出对赋予部长权力过于广泛、以及可能形成寒蝉效应的忧虑。一些议员、公民组织都曾建议政府再修法,不过在今年5月8日,草案在未经修改下,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过。 不过,此前律政部长尚穆根在回应官委议员提问时,曾表示将为该法草拟附属条例,那我们且来看看,这些新近公布的条例,是否有回应此前众人对该法表达的忧虑。 忧虑一:法案定义过于笼统 国际法律家委员会(International Commission of Jurists),今年4月中旬曾致函我国领导李显龙及其阁僚,表达对我国《防假消息法》草案的高度关注,认为该法案“定义笼统”,在很多方面都不符合国际司法标准。 工人党议员刘程强在参与草案辩论时,也认为部长可利用法案内假消息的广泛定义条文,根据需要对有关文字是信息还是意见做出选择性的诠释。 不过,就目前在政府电子先报上看到的《防假消息法》附属条例,似乎没有进一步厘清如何解决法案定义过于笼统的问题。 不过,在附属条例第16(1)下,则阐释何谓网络中介和网站持有人,例如拥有每月至少平均50万,来自新加坡的访问用户;而网页持有人/运营者,则指其网站连续三个月,平均每月有10万访客。…

Report calls for government to relook at end-of-life care schemes and giving better quality of life, netizens back the call

Singaporeans’ ideal situation of a “good death” is to die at home…

民主党主打生活成本、就业与退休议题

民主党秘书长徐顺全表示,目前该党主打三大议题:生活成本、人口与本地就业前景,以及公积金议题。 民主党在本周日动员党员和支持者,拜访马西岭-油池、武吉巴督、武吉班让、荷兰-武吉知马和裕华等选区,向选民拜早年。 在接受本社、《亚洲新闻台》、《海峡时报》等本地媒体采访时,徐顺全表示,从去年开始该党就积极强打上述三大议题,例如消费税上调至9巴仙,肯定会对民众生活带来影响。 副总理王瑞杰在去年宣称,提前告知民众消费税将调高,以避免被反对党炒作。 徐顺全则认为,消费税是激进型的税赋,且对中低收入者都不公平。他抨击行动党政府透过纳税人的钱,来推行“建国一代”、“立国一代”等配套,用在开销上,然后指开销增加,他们被迫调高消费税。 他建议行动党政府应停止这种在选举前“派糖果”的做法,并把这些开销归纳在政府开支以避免税收。 此外,国人面对就业忧虑的问题早已多年,但为何人力部长杨莉明,时至近日才后知后觉,宣布更新公平考量框架(FCF),对那些未公平考量本地人的雇主予以更严重惩处? 再者,还有退休国人的公积金,领入息要拉长至28年,假设65岁才领入息,要到93岁才能拿完,每月也仅482元的入息。“很多国人都反映说这是不合理的。” 强有力反对党  确保政策合理顺从民意 关于马西岭二组屋翻新电梯的课题,该党主席淡马亚指出,问题已拖沓多年,如果不是林文兴和陈两裕等人积极反映,才得到当局的关注,这说明反对党声音的重要,为那些声音被忽略的群众,把他们的问题带到国会。 另一方面,徐顺全曾在本月16日,在脸书发文指收到上述组屋居民反映的好消息,指政府将提升该区组屋电梯,不过后来才得知是“空欢喜一场”。…