An Indian national, Debayan Mukherjee, wrote on Quora early this month (Dec 2018) revealing how happy he was with his former employer, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), for enabling him to go to Singapore and work for Citibank in Singapore.

He first got into TCS in Jul 2014 through a walk-in interview at Kolkata, Debayan explained. “I was the first person to appear for the interview for Data-warehousing with Big data and cleared it without much of a hassle. Got the offer letter same day,” he recalled.

He revealed that he was assigned to a project team working on an Anti-Money Laundering program for Citibank AsiaPac based in Singapore. “First two weeks I was on bench, since my new team members were meeting clients in Bangalore. I spent two weeks at home, met my team after two weeks and started working on the project. It was a pilot project for Asia Pac for Citibank North America, and we were to do a POC (Proof of Concept),” he said.

“POC went successful and we started to work on a Anti-Money Laundering program from Sept 15, 2014. Fast forward to 30th Nov, 2014, I was sent to Singapore for co-ordination, data access and delivery.”

He later recalled being in a “living hell” working almost 16–18 hours a day everyday on the project for next 8 months. Upon completion of the project in 2015, he got a 15% pay raise from his employer TCS.

Then in Aug 2015, Citibank decided to offer him a position in the bank so that he could continue working on the same project as the team lead. And TCS was quite happy to let him go to Citibank. TCS, persumably, thought that it would help TCS further with regard to the project as well as future business relationship with Citibank.

“I discussed this with my (TCS’) account manager and project lead and they were both fine to let me go. Despite this I was promoted in Sept, 2015 and got another 17% raise. Dec 30, 2015 I left TCS to join my current organization (Citibank in Singapore),” he said.

Debayan was full of praise for TCS, talking about the “unending support” from his TCS’ project lead. He said, “Despite having least experience, he thought that I’d be the right fit for onsite position.”

When he wanted to take his leave before leaving TCS, TCS even flew someone from Kolkata to Singapore to take his place supporting the project. “I was never asked to cancel my leaves although the work pressure was too much,” he shared.

“Everyone in the project (at one point almost 20 people) including the global account manager, offshore account manager and my lead used to call me personally and thank me for supporting the project. I was part of design discussions which was way above my pay grade.”

“I felt special, each day, everyday. As I said, despite knowing that I’d leave the organization, I was promoted, supported with housing allowance during notice period,” he continued. “I was beyond lucky to have such people as my peers and seniors. It’s been almost three years, I still miss my days in TCS.”

Indeed, according to his LinkedIn information, he joined CitiBank in Singapore from Dec 2015. He was even recently promoted to become the Assistant Vice President in Jan this year.

And according to his profile on Quora, he graduated from the Guru Nanak Institute of Technology in Kolkata.

Developing a Singaporean core

In a Parliamentary speech in 2013, then Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin talked about “developing the Singaporean Core” in the workforce.

“One important aspect of this approach is to take a firm stand against discriminatory employment practices,” he told the House at the time.

In fact, Mr Tan revealed that there had been companies practising “Hiring-own-Kind” in their company thereby weakening the process of developing a Singaporean core in the industries.

He said, “For example, DPM Tharman and I have met up with the senior management of a number of financial institutions on a few occasions to stress the point that financial industry players should make a more concerted effort to develop a local talent pipeline.”

“The management have been quite honest to reflect that they will be more mindful of the need to ensure that discriminatory hiring practices are not entrenched in their industry. Some were quite candid – they honestly said they recognised that they had not paid enough attention to how hiring was done and that unhealthy enclaves had been formed. Others acknowledged that they would need to be conscious of diversity and clustering in their make-up,” Mr Tan added.

And at an ABS Annual Dinner in 2015, DPM Tharman also talked about introducing manpower development initiatives to “ensure a strong Singaporean core across the range of activities in the financial sector”.

“Our vision is to be a financial centre that is among the leaders globally in workforce skills and expertise, and one with a strong core of Singaporeans at every level,” he said.

However, as can be seen in Debayan case, there would be little chance of developing a strong core of Singaporeans in IT if companies continue to outsource IT projects to India, and later on hiring the staff from those vendor companies back into their own companies.

This is especially critical as more financial institutions are embarking on Fintech to improve their internal bank processes like automatically spotting money laundering activities.

Furthermore, with Mr Tan now out of the Cabinet assuming the Speaker of Parliament position and DPM Tharman retiring with 4G younger PAP leaders replacing him, it’s not known if there would still be Cabinet ministers left helping to develop a Singaporean core and looking after the interests of Singaporeans.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

求助反被讽刺 餐饮业者、食评家发文挺肉骨茶店

不少餐饮业者同样面对疫情打击,生意大受影响,本地招牌餐厅“发起人肉骨茶”早前在脸书帖文,促请民众给予支持,让餐馆度过难关,免于倒闭。 不少网民响应,但是也有的网友认为可以关闭部分分店,重新调整步骤并检讨营运方式,甚至可以检查分店的瑕疵并作出改善。 然而,令人哭笑不得的是,有些网民认为这只是商家打广告的手法,完全无法接受。有者更认为为什么这么多年都熬过去了,现在才面对困难?为什么只有一个月的促销?为什么促销只在分店? 有网民则表示,听闻该餐馆的老板住大洋房、开豪车,“42年来你卖贵货赚大钱,现在才几个月的坏生意就要关店。我不相信,除非你出示证据”。 类似的话语一出,瞬间引起很多餐饮业及有经验者的注意,认为他们似乎对餐饮业者有了误导性的观点。 “金记潮州卤鸭粿汁”东主周志伟帖文指出,在有些人眼中,存在着小贩就不应该住大洋房、开豪车成为富翁,应该永远是穷人的错误观念。 “这些能够住大洋房开豪车的小贩都不是一夜或数个月成名的、他们付出了很多努力、时间、精力,面对很多失败和受伤后,才能拥有更好的生活品质及保障。他们日出前就开工,日落后的清晨才回家。他们为什么不应该富有?” 他希望网民们能够换位思考,就好比他们在工作时,“若老板发现你收入过多了,你变得有钱了,就应该解雇你吗?或当你拥有公司,辅助你的大公司认为你赚大钱、住豪宅了,所以切断所有和你的交易,只因为你的收入很多。这逻辑吗?” 周志伟指出,所有餐饮业者都了解到,危机当前,该行业有多脆弱,而目前有多少业者在赚钱?几乎都面对亏损吧! 他表示,其实很多企业在此时都面对经济难关,无论它是否是大品牌。因此,他认为在此时此刻,大家更应该释放善意,伸出援手互相帮忙,团结起来克服困难。他也希望网民们,停止对面对困境的商家和业者们给予负面评论。“如果有人给你同样的反应,你要忍得住啊!” 此外,食评家司徒国辉也针对此事发帖指出,辛苦工作和长时间工作永远不是小贩或餐饮业者所畏惧的,但是拥有落后的第三世界文化及自私思维的客户,才是他们的最大敌人。 “他们不相信小贩能够或应该成功,因为他对待谦卑和重视工作的人们有了‘奴役’态度和思维。”

【冠状病毒19】在印尼感染冠病 64岁本地男子不幸病逝

据卫生部文告,一名64岁本地男子,在印尼感染冠病19,随后从当地医院转移返国治疗,惟不幸在本月26日因并发症逝世。 去年3月17日,上述男子就已旅居印尼,他患有高脂血症。不过他在上月26日确诊冠病而住院。 1月29日,他被送返我国,在国家传染病中心接受治疗。惟不幸在昨日病逝。 国家传染病中心已联系死者家属为他们提供协助。由于该名男子已记录在外国的确诊病例,为此未被列为本土冠病病例。在该名男子之前,本地已有29例冠病死亡病例。

另一“女佣洗冤录”? 被指盗雇主存款菲佣成功脱罪

高庭对前女佣巴蒂案在今年9月的判决,无疑在本埠抛下震撼弹,巴蒂原本被判监禁26个月,但高庭推翻国家法院判决,法官陈成安也形容樟宜机场集团前主席廖文良一家可能存在“不当意图”,女佣巴蒂有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 不过,10月30日,高庭亦推翻另一和女佣有关的判决。一名菲律宾籍女佣,原本被指控盗取老顾祝银行存款8千元,被判坐牢一年。不过经上诉得直无罪释放。 名为波蒂拉(Portela Vilma Jimenez)的50岁菲佣,原本负责照顾89岁的老雇主夫妇,雇主妻子不良于行。 但是,老雇主指控波蒂拉在2017年1月和2月期间,八次盗提老雇主银行存款,面对多达10项偷窃控状。波蒂拉不认罪,也指责老雇主四度非礼她,还要和她发生性关系。 波蒂拉也指老雇主趁老妇熟睡时闯入她房间,老雇主提议500元任摸,前者为了钱而答应。国家法院法官早前下判时,认为老雇主非礼波蒂拉一两次,但没必要一再不偿,并指责女佣口供前后不一,判她坐牢一年。 不满刑罚的女佣则透过来自尤金(Eugene Thuraisingam)律师楼的两名大状黄舒旺和夏珊娜,再次上诉,并提出如下疑点: 老雇主声称2017年2月初发现有未经授权提款,但审讯时却揭露当时根本没人从他户口提款 老雇主发现后,却拖了三个星期才报案 老雇主声称钱包一直在身上,那么波蒂拉如何拿到提款卡?…


陆路交通局基于现今八座多用途汽车安全标准已提升,从本周六(2月1日)起,将取消该款车辆施加车速限制,与其他小型汽车相同。 目前,八座多用途车速限是每小时70公里,而其他小型汽车则没有车辆时速限制。 陆路交通管理局于今日发文告,指出从下月起将取消这类多用途车的车辆时速,未来车主和八座车辆驾驶者,只需和其他小型汽车一样,遵守公路的时速限制。这项措施与其他国家一致。 此外,陆交局在本周六起,也会针对部分机动起重机(mobile crane)试行新时速。 目前,载重量2.4万公斤以下的机动起重机,速限制将调高到每小时40公里;2.4万公斤以上的,速限为每小时20公里。 陆交局指出,试行计划是基于业界反馈,每小时20公里的时速限制会导致路上行驶时间延长,使得驾驶员容易疲劳。 当局指出,该决定考量了车辆技术和设计的改进,使移动式起重机能够以更高的速度安全行驶,并且与其他国家(如澳大利亚,香港和英国)的做法一致。 在澳洲,机动起重机的限速为40-50公里/小时,英国为48公里/小时,在香港为70公里/小时。 陆路交通局强调,在试行阶段,所有机动起重机车辆仍需遵守车辆时速或公路时速,以两者之间较低的时速限制为准。 陆交局和交警也提醒,所有驾驶者和道路使用者必须在保障公路安全上扮演角色。超速驾驶的司机将受到处罚,其中可能包括罚款,扣分或被提控。 新加坡起重机协会主席Jimmy…