Man trying to find work with online job search engine on laptop. Jobseeker in home office. CV and application paper on table. Motivated applicant. Modern job hunting, seeking and unemployment concept from Shutterstock.com

In a recent survey of professional economic forecasters published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) this month, it was projected that the unemployment rate of Singapore to remain at 2.1% at year-end, unchanged from the previous forecast.

The survey respondents also expect GDP growth to come in at 3.3% in 2018, up slightly from the previous survey.

“As reflected by the mean probability distribution, the most likely outcome is for the Singapore economy to grow by between 3.0 and 3.4% this year, unchanged from the previous survey,” MAS said.

For 2019, Singapore GDP is projected to expand by 2.6%.

Rising cost of living

At the same time, the CPI-All Items inflation and MAS Core Inflation are expected to come in at 0.5% and 1.7%, respectively this year.

In fact, the CPI-All Items inflation for 2018 as a whole was forecast to be 0.5%, down from 0.7% in the previous quarter survey.

For 2019, the CPI-All Items inflation is expected to go up to 1.3%, while MAS Core Inflation is expected to be 1.8%.

MAS said, “Respondents most commonly identified the easing of trade tensions as a possible upside to Singapore’s growth outlook.”

“Trade protectionism remains a key concern, with 100% of respondents citing an intensification of US-China trade tensions as a downside risk, up from 89% in the previous survey. In addition, a growing number of respondents flagged slower growth in China as a downside risk, on the back of tightening credit conditions,” it added.

Another downside risk flagged by the respondents is the “faster than expected US interest rate hikes”, which could trigger financial market turbulence.

If the US interest rate goes up, Singapore interest rate will also go up in tandem, putting pressure on most Singaporeans who borrowed heavily to finance their property purchases.

Under-employment not reported

The survey, however, did not show any figures to reflect the “under-employment” situation in Singapore. Many Singaporean PMETs who were retrenched, ended up driving taxi, becoming insurance or property agents, or working as odd-job laborers. The government data, of course, would reflect that these Singaporeans are still “employed”.

Hence, inevitably, they would receive a reduction in salary and enjoy a much lower standard of living than before.

Take for example, former Singaporean general manager Long Khin Keong has resorted to driving taxi to make a living after he was retrenched. He used to draw $15,000 a month in salary. But as a cab driver, he earns less than $2,000 a month. He said it would take eight months to earn $15,000 as a taxi driver.

He was forced to drive a cab after struggling for years to find a suitable job.

“Hopefully somebody ‘up there’ reads this and improves the predicament of many like myself,” he told the reporter. “I’m not asking to become a GM again, I just want to be somewhere I can contribute with my experience.”

Then there is Richard, aged 48, single and holds a master’s degree in financial management. He was a senior banker who lost his $14,000-a-month job.

Life has been a long struggle since. In between his search for full-time work, he did odd jobs such as washing dishes in a restaurant and distributing flyers, which of course would show that he is still “employed”.

He was willing to work as little as $3,000 a month as a caregiver but was told it required related experience.

“I am willing to adapt, but I feel employers are not willing to adapt. They keep wanting people with the right experience,” he said.

Singapore University of Social Sciences labour economist Walter Theseira commented, “Once they (PMETs) fall off a career track, it may be hard to get back on because, if the industry picks up again, employers may see jobs like driving Uber or selling property as irrelevant experience.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Booting out the (local) boys in blue – is that the key issue?

By Howard Lee Would you accept foreigners in your police force? That…

Indonesia’s healthcare system unable to cope with the COVID-19 outbreak

Indonesia faces a significant lack of hospital beds, medical staff and intensive…

五年前被指杀人、被引渡槟城关四个月 公民莫汉要向当局讨说法

“很多人都以为我杀了人… 我在工作场所众目睽睽下当众被逮捕,这是天大的耻辱。” 50岁的莫汉(Mohan Rajangam),原本在一家物流公司兢兢业业,但是五年前,他原本平静的日子却迎来了天翻地覆的可怕经历—-他被指控涉嫌一宗在马来西亚槟城发生的谋杀案,警方直接突击他的工作场所搜查并逮捕他,而后再被转交马国。 他在马国逗留长达四个月,但是马国法庭未提控他,最终因未涉及谋杀嫌疑被释放。然而这段经历却让他饱受煎熬,除了健康受影响,他也为此丢失工作。莫汉选择在生活重归轨道的五年后,才愿意口述自己的故事。 一切来得太突然 莫汉忆述,2015年的3月21日,近20名警官突然杀到他的工作地点,“我把我的身份证给他们看,然后他们带着我上公司三楼翻查所有事物,再为我上手铐,去翻查我的车,搜出我的护照”。他指警方搜查时没有说明任何理由。 较后他被押到广东民大厦,接着到肃毒局做尿检、被私会党取缔组问话。莫汉表示他如实告诉他所知的,两个部门都认为他与案子没关联,让他待在拘留处。 莫汉提及其中一位调查官在审问时态度非常恶劣,只是简单问他谋杀案发生当晚他在哪里、做什么,也没在手提电脑上做记录. 莫汉认为,直到罪证确凿,一个人都不应被当成犯人看待,而他感到有关调查官似乎已把他当作犯人;且在被拘留的48小时期间,也未有法律代表。 “48小时后,我以为他们要释放我…但他们为我的手脚上手铐,带我到法庭。其中一位传译员念到’我在2015年3月2日晚9时20分,我在乔治市枪杀一名印裔男子’,我忘了叫什么名。” 莫汉指的枪杀案,死者名为51岁的斯瓦古玛(E…

Dealing with democracy from young

by Ow Shi Hong/ I address the article titled “Study details of Opposition’s…