National Development Minister Lawrence Wong published a blog today (16 Nov) relating how he recently helped an elderly couple to do some financial planning for their retirement.

In general, Singaporeans are asset rich but cash poor. A lot of their cash is stuck in the high-priced properties in Singapore, so much so that many have found it difficult to retire comfortably here. The present government believes in self-sufficiency, that is, each Singaporean has to take care of his own retirement without any help from the state. The government would only give help to the dirt poor but even so, the help it gives is rather miserable.

Hence, for the rest of Singaporeans who are asset rich but cash poor, the government is asking them to “right-size” their house, a euphemism for down-sizing one’s house. In this way, one can then “squeeze” cash out of concrete – his or her property – by living in smaller flats.

Right-sizing one’s flat

In his blog, Minister Wong said, “Financial planning for retirement is something we must all take seriously. For HDB flat owners, this process is also linked to the various monetisation options to unlock the value of their flats.”

“For example, I recently met an elderly couple in their 60s living in an Executive flat in Woodlands. Their flat is worth $570,000 today, and they are looking to monetise their flat for retirement, as their children are all married and have their own flats. I went through with them their options,” he revealed.

Minister Wong then talked about choosing the “right-sized” house to move into. “For example, they can buy a 3-room resale flat in the same town for about $230,000 with around 55 years of remaining lease, which would be more than enough lease to cover them for life,” he said.

“In fact, they could even get a Proximity Housing Grant of $20,000 if the resale flat is close to their children (within a distance of 4 km).”

Alternatively, can buy a new 3-room HDB flat with a full 99-year lease, he said. This is, of course, assuming that the couple is eligible to buy a second subsidised flat from HDB. But buying a second-subsidized flat from HDB would mean they will have to pay a resale levy of $50,000 on top of the price of the flat.

“Another option is to purchase a new 2-room Flexi flat with a short-lease from HDB. This will be more affordable, and the resale levy is also reduced to around $18,000 or less,” Minister Wong added.

“If they are right-sizing to a 3-room or smaller flat (new or resale), they can also take up the Silver Housing Bonus (SHB) to receive a cash bonus of up to $20,000 when they use part of their cash proceeds (from sale of their Executive flat) to top up their CPF Retirement Accounts and join CPF LIFE, which will provide them with a monthly income stream for life.”

In other words, Minister Wong is encouraging the couple to use the balance of the cash proceeds from after selling their Executive flat and buying a 3-room or smaller, to put back into their CPF accounts.

LBS and renting out rooms

He also suggested taking up the HDB Lease Buyback Scheme (LBS) if the couple wish to continue to stay in their current flat. He said, “As I have announced previously, we are extending the LBS to 5-room and larger flats. HDB is working out the details, which should be ready by early next year.”

But the amount one can get from LBS will be smaller than what one can get from “right-sizing”. Then, there is the option for the couple to consider renting out their empty bedrooms to foreigners but that would mean a loss of privacy.

“As our population ages, Singaporeans will be looking at ways to plan ahead for their retirement. We will do more to help everyone in this process, so that they can be assured of a home for life, and also enjoy financial security in their golden years,” he said.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

25本地公民组织联署声明 国家应容许“真诚分歧”捍卫言论自由

25个本地网络媒体、群组和公民组织,包括本社、情义之家、第八功能、MARUAH、CARE等发表联署声明,呼吁新加坡社会应容许“真诚分歧”,并检讨现有限制言论自由的法律规章。 声明表示,公民群体高度关注本地社运分子范国瀚面对的多项控状。2017年,范国瀚被指涉非法集会、破坏公物,且拒绝签署警方口供而被提控。当时本地有六家非政府组织发文声援、6533人联署,并呼吁捍卫言论自由。 此后,多个东南亚和国际组织,都呼吁我国政府撤销掉对范国瀚的诉讼,包括:欧盟国家的一些议员、马国52家公民社会组织、联合国人权委会、人权观察组织、国际特赦组织、CIVICUS、国际法律家委员会、言论自由维权组织“ARTICLE 19”、东盟国会议员支持人权组织(APHR)和亚洲论坛等。 来自各地的声援声浪,再再说明对范的起诉,已经违反了社会共同的愿景,即不论本土公民、非公民居民和海外盟友,都拥有集会、串联、和平抗议、言论和书写的自由,以及能公开辩论棘手课题。 “如果言论自由仅限于芳林花园,那就不是真正的自由。” 即便面对要求撤销范国瀚诉状的舆论和呼声,但是后者还是面对判决。此外,他还因为声援被控被控刑事诽谤的《网络公民》总编许渊臣,在法庭前举起一张A4纸拍照,也因此被警方援引《公共秩序法》调查。 声明指出,对范的控状,如同对公共自由的严重钳制,使得民间追求变革和为不公发声的能力被打压。 “即便政府不认同、不愿接受,我们仍有表达真相的自由,并且为共同关注的课题坦诚交流和行动。” 应容许“真诚的分歧” 诚如非选区议员特斯拉所言,健全的社会必须容许“真诚的分歧”。但是假借公共秩序、防止外国干预或藐视法庭之名,实则打压言论自由的法律规章,都应该严谨检讨。 声明称,过去范国瀚把心血都花在本土各项人权和社会议题,他所表达的关注,其实和所有国人息息相关,而对范的诉讼对国人来说不是好现象。声援范国瀚,也正是共同捍卫国人得以免于恐惧和自由的生活。…

Where does the priority of LTA lie when it choose to allow frequency of public transportation services to be reduced?

As the government imposes “Circuit Breaker” (CB) measures in Singapore in a…

错手杀人逃逾30年 马国客工认罪囚八年半

为1000元薪资与同事起争执甚至拿起铁锤错手杀人。因工作准证名字拼错,男子得以躲过警方逮捕30余年。惟最终在2016年落网,认罪后被判入狱八年半。 1986年,一名28岁的马来西亚杂工在酒后,因为未获得工资而与同事起争议,错手拿起锤子将同事打死,并于当晚穿过长提逃到柔佛去。 在此事后的30余年,阿鲁姆干(Arumugam Vellasamy)都逍遥法外,且成功跨国长提往返新加坡和柔佛数次,一直到当局成功透过指纹识别技术确认了她的身份为止。 被告的代表律师Siraj Shaik Aziz在法庭上指出,他的当事人确实看到警方通缉,但是因为名字被错拼一事,他完全不知道自己就是通缉犯。 现在这个61岁,拥有4个孙子的被告终于在2016年,在通过兀兰关卡进入我国时落网了,惟警方并未详细透露逮捕过程。 在新加坡法院上,阿鲁姆干面对不等于谋杀的非法杀人指控(culpable homicide not amounting…