Singapore is supposed to be neither a military state or a police state. Yet based on the increasing number of police and military profile raising exercises ranging from posters to videos to public displays of might, it is beginning to look a little bit like the military or police state that it is not supposed to be.

It has been noticed that there has been a heightened focus on the threat of terrorism in the past year even though there is no evidence to suggest that the threat is any higher than before. Further, the police force appear to have been on a mission to showcase its machismo. Now, there is a joint police and military exercise based on the alleged threat of terrorism. Is this too much of an overkill? Is there a genuine threat or is it a bit of a red herring?

Taken in conjunction with rumours of a 2019 general election, the high profile Workers’ Party (WP) lawsuit which could potentially bankrupt the top brass of the nation’s leading political party making them unable to contest, the way potential critics are swiftly discredited and the ramping up of regulations against “fake news”, one could arguably see a pattern of disrupting potential challengers to the incumbent Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) government. In isolation, each issue can be disregarded but altogether and in context, there could perhaps be a more disturbing trend of behaviour on the part of the PAP to consolidate power.

On the surface, it could look like a very vigilant government intent on safeguarding the interests of the public against any potential terrorist attack. That said, the very public nature of the exercises and the way photos are published to show uniformed men forcefully tackling individuals could potentially be a message to the public of the authority and power the present government has at its disposal.

If there really was a genuine terrorist threat, wouldn’t the authorities be more secretive about its methods to take them down? The last thing we want is for would be terrorists to see what preparations we have made so that they can try and better our strategies to mount an effective attack! Isn’t discretion key?

If the government is trying to reassure us of its ability to protect us, it is having the opposite effect on me. It is either playing too much into the hands of would-be terrorists by giving away all our secrets or it is subtly giving us the impression (whether rightly or wrongly) that our government has at its disposal a huge arsenal to use against anyone considered an enemy by the PAP run government.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Is the HDB public housing scheme like a runaway train, waiting to crash?

The “nobody stay for 5 years” HDB flat units, may just be…

Have suggestions for the Govt?

Ever had your suggestions or ideas dismissed by the government? Jack Sim, founder and director of the World Toilet Organisation, gives some pointers on how you can get heard.

Spending 14 million to reduce energy consumption does not gel with Masagos Zulkifli’s stance on plastic use

Singapore’s policies are sometimes mind-boggling and contradictory. An example of this seemingly…

失明妇遭抢 民众无动于衷 网民:因事情发生太突然?!

一名网友于星期三(5月1日)在其脸书账户上,分享一宗失明妇遭抢劫,但是现场人群却无动于衷的事件,吸引超过1万3000人转发,4000人做出反应。 网友杰西卡·文森特(Jessica Vincent)在其脸书上帖文忆述这起发生在义顺地铁站的抢劫事件。她指出,抢劫事件发生在4月30日晚上7时20分左右,一名自义顺地跌站向北卖艺的失明妇遭另一名女性抢劫了。 网友在脸书贴文上写道,“这名失明女士于2019年4月30日晚上7时20分左右,义顺地铁站朝北的地区被抢劫。一名女士抢走了她放着一天收入的袋子后,逃走了!!” 杰西卡告诉《网络公民》说,她实际上并没有看到被指控的小偷和抢劫案的发生经过。当时,她是和家人在一起,在听到实名的街头小贩呼救声后,才知道发生了抢劫案,并趋前了解事情的发生。 搞错捕捉对象 那时她才了解到,该名盲妇遭到另一名身穿红色T恤的女人抢劫。初时,杰西卡表示,她看到一名50余岁的华裔女子正在跑,她以为该名女子就是抢劫犯。但是在成功阻止该华裔女性后,她才发现搞错了,而华裔女性正在追真正的窃贼。 该中年华裔女性表示,在未能成功抓到嫌犯后,她即刻拍下嫌犯的照片,杰西卡也将嫌犯的照片上载到脸书贴文上。 “据这名女士(华裔女子)说道,小偷在和她表明没有偷窃并发生短暂争吵后逃跑了。华裔女子成功拍下这名‘被指控的小偷’的照片,她是看见、追捕、对抗并拍下这张照片的关键证人。” 杰西卡也表示,她对于地铁站内没有人停下脚步协助抓贼,或在事件后帮助失明妇,感到非常震惊。 “甚至没有人走到因被抢劫而受到惊吓失明妇身边,帮助她。我猜是因为一切发生的太快了,人们甚至来不及反应。地铁站内非常拥挤,我也很惊讶那名嫌犯敢在如此拥挤的地方作案。” 在抢劫案后,杰西卡指出,她已经报警了,而警方也已经回应,表示他们将会展开调查,并且“尽力”逮捕嫌犯。…