A hangman’s noose

Following the series of recent executions by the state – most notably that of Malaysian Prabu N Pathmanathan who was convicted for drug trafficking – and backlash from human rights organisations, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) will be carrying out a survey to study the Singaporean consensus regarding the death penalty.

The survey — which will involve 2,000 Singaporeans and permanent resident selected at random — will be conducted between Oct and Dec this year by leading local market research consultancy Blackbox Research, commissioned by the MHA itself.

The selected individuals were informed of their participation in letters seen by Channel NewsAsia, in which it was stated that a representative from Blackbox may visit the participants’ house to interview them.

To ensure authenticity of the process and to build trust with the participants, the interviewer will be identifiable by the company’s identity pass and an authorisation letter from the MHA.

Participants are assured of their privacy and confidentiality in the letter.

“Please be assured that the survey is non-identifiable and your responses will be kept anonymous,” the letter stated, adding that the survey will take approximately 15 minutes.

As a small token of appreciation for their participation, each respondent will receive a S$5 NTUC FairPrice voucher upon successful completion of the survey.

A MHA spokesperson said, in response to Channel NewsAsia’s queries, that the survey aims to obtain “a better understanding of Singapore residents’ attitudes towards the death penalty,” as well as being a part of the Government’s continuous research on the Republic’s criminal justice system.

Human rights groups remain sceptical of MHA’s aims regarding the survey

Human rights organisations, however, remain sceptical of the Singapore government’s willingness to abolish the death penalty, given its track record of executions and its strong retentionist stance, the latter of which has often been repeated in the past by Law Minister K Shanmugam on various occasions.

Deputy director for Asia at Human Rights Watch Phil Robertson said: “There’s been no indication whatsoever that Singapore’s position on use of the death penalty is softening.”

Speaking to AFP, Mr Robertson added: “One wonders whether the MHA is counting on a survey of public opinion to back their views and provide justification for their continued defiance of the international trend towards abolishing the death penalty.”

REACH survey in 2016 reveals Singaporeans’ and PRs’ strong support for death penalty

Findings from a REACH survey — which was conducted in 2016 — revealed that the majority of Singaporeans and permanent residents support the death penalty as a form of sentencing in Singapore’s criminal justice system, with eight in 10 respondents agreeing with the retention of the death penalty, and 82 per cent of the respondents agreeing that the death penalty remains an effective deterrent against heinous and serious crimes in the Republic. 

Only one in 10 respondents agreed that the death penalty should be abolished.

Singapore Prison Service data reveals worryingly consistent number of executions by the state

Data from the Singapore Prison Service revealed that eight executions had taken place just last year, and all of them were carried out over drug offences.

Four executions were carried out two years ago – two for drug-related offences, and two for murder.

Six years ago, Parliament had passed laws to remove the mandatory death penalty in exceptional cases of drug trafficking, as well as in murder cases where the intention to kill cannot be proved, with life imprisonment among the alternatives for sentencing at the discretion of the judge.

Four men executed by the state within only 48 hours this month; eight executions carried out in total this year so far

This month alone, four individuals were executed under the Singapore death penalty law:

  • Selamat Bin Paki and Ali Bin Mohamad Bahashwan, who were executed on the afternoon of 24 Oct; and
  • Irwan Bin Ali and Prabu N Pathmanathan, who were executed on the morning of 26 Oct.

Eight executions were carried out this year so far.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Prof Yaacob Ibrahim raises the issue of trust in the Singapore government in his budget debate speech

During the budget debate speech in Parliament earlier today (27 Feb), MP…

大量购鸡蛋、被标签“囤货” 网友澄清夫妇实为学校小贩

近两日,网上流传了一对男女购买很多托鸡蛋,过马路时鸡蛋跌落地上,两人还必须蹲下身将完好的鸡蛋拾起,就有网民讥讽“这是就是囤货的因果报应”。所幸有网民揭露,这对夫妇其实是本地学校的食堂小贩,他们都为开学而忙! 社交媒体脸书最近上传了两张照片,首张照片只见一对男女购买了很多托鸡蛋,准备过马路;第二张照片中只见有不少鸡蛋掉在地上,蛋黄散在满路,两人都弯下身把完好的鸡蛋拾起来。不少网民看到两张照片都纷纷留言,批评两人光明正大地囤货,鸡蛋掉落地上就是“报应”。 自马来西亚宣布锁国后,就有不少市民开始囤货,而职总平价超市也限制了每名顾客的必需品购买额,包括限定每名顾客购买30粒鸡蛋。 但是当看到帖文中的两张照片时,会发现他们所购买的鸡蛋大约有30托,令网民无法接受。 为品质保证到巴刹购物 然而,之后却有人于21日在脸书上发帖伸张正义,指出帖文中的夫妇是本地学校的小贩,也是她友人的父母。 她指出,两人为人诚实和勤奋,基于政府宣布今日(23日)学校开课,为了确保品质,就不从供应商拿货,而跑到巴刹去购买鸡蛋。岂止两人的照片被拍下后,被指责是囤货者而在网上流传开来。“他们购买鸡蛋,只是为了让学校的孩子们能够享用美味又健康的餐点。” 帖文中,她也指出,了解网民对看图就误会而生气的举止,但是也不应该没查清楚情况就直接下定论。“因此,下次,希望不要只相信您在网络上所看到的一切。” 她的帖文还附上了夫妇孩子的一段话,指已经就此事报警,并且会向网络假信息和网络操纵办事处(POFMA office)投报,并向脸书举报有关的假消息。 不少网民都认同“不可妄下定论”这一说辞,并表示在看到照片时,见到两人弯腰拾起鸡蛋的一幕就为她们感到心痛。“看到人们在没弄清楚事实前就批评他人,让我倍感心痛。这个世界因为有太多心理生病的人,生病了。” 也有网民认为生鸡蛋都有期限,男子买这么多鸡蛋一定有原因,就和卫生部兼内政部政务次长安宁阿敏日前被回应“不关你的事”一样,不应该妄下定论。“uncle是用自己的钱买东西,如果你有这么多时间来拍图说故事,怎么不去做志愿者,帮助抗疫行动。”…

Momentum for animal rights is growing

~by: Cheong Yaoming~ This year’s Singapore Animal Welfare Symposium and Public Forum…

Singapore retains position as second safest city in the world behind Tokyo – Safe Cities Index 2019

Singapore retains its position as the second safest city in the world,…