A hangman’s noose

Update (1.01pm on 26 October 2018) – TOC understands that the total number of executions this week stands at 4 and not 3, as reported earlier. It has come to our attention that Ali Bin Mohamad Bahashwan was executed alongside his co-accused Selamat Bin Paki on Wednesday afternoon (24 October 2018). As a result of the lack of official data and statistics regarding executions, we had to take some time to verify and confirm this information before publishing this update. Prabu and Irwan were executed earlier today at 6am. Full story here.

While the newly elected Pakatan Harapan Government prepares to abolish the death penalty and ramps up its efforts to save the lives of Malaysians who are on death row abroad, their counterparts across the causeway seem to be hellbent on what can only be described as an unprecedented and vicious rampage.

Traditionally, executions in Singapore only take place at dawn on Friday. The only exception in recent history is the case of Kho Jabing who was originally set to be executed on Friday morning but was hung on Friday afternoon instead owing to an eleventh-hour appeal which was heard dismissed on the morning of his execution. Following Jabing’s execution, the time between an inmate’s execution and the time an inmate’s family will be notified of the execution decreased from two weeks to just one week.

This week, Singapore is set to execute no less than four inmates in a span of just 48 hours. Earlier today (24 October 2018), Selamat Bin Paki and his co-accused Ali Bin Mohamad Bahashwan were executed. This is the first time that an inmate is being executed on a Wednesday. Another two executions are slated for this Friday (26 October 2018). The family of Prabu N Pathmanathan, a  31 year-old Malaysian national who is set to be executed this Friday, was only notified of his execution date on 20 October 2018 according to a report from Malaysiakini. Irwan Ali, a Singaporean, is the other inmate who is set to be executed this Friday.

As executions are not announced publicly, activists and lawyers face a hard time trying to find out the execution dates of inmates. The short time between when the families are notified and when the executions take place also make it hard to arrange for family members, especially those who live overseas and may not be able to afford to travel to Singapore, to spend some time with the inmate during his/her final days and hours. Prior to the case of Jabing, activists and lawyers also operated under the assumption that if one could get an execution stayed, the inmate would not be hung until the following Friday morning – giving more time for the family to prepare for the execution and legal recourse, if any. However, the “rush” to execute Jabing following the dismissal of his criminal motion throws all of those assumptions, which were once widely accepted as conventions surrounding execution by all parties, out of the window. Kirsten Han, an anti-death penalty activist from Singapore, summarises the bleak situation in the following words:

“It is shocking to hear about a hanging taking place on a Wednesday, departing from years of precedent where executions took place at 6am on Fridays. Although it’s awful to hang people on any day of the week, this move away from the prison’s usual practice means that the little that we know about capital punishment in Singapore might no longer be true, making the death penalty regime even more opaque and unaccountable to the public than before.

We have also noticed that the time between the rejection of a clemency appeal and the scheduling of an execution has been reduced, which means families also have less time to mentally and emotionally prepare themselves.” – Kirsten Han, Second Chances

In addition to the lack of rigidity surrounding the conventions governing the process of execution, the Singapore Prisons Services and the Ministry of Home Affairs is not transparent in relation to the total number of executions per year. TOC understands that if the two executions slated for Friday are carried out, it would mean that no less than eight inmates were hung this year. This is an increase from the total number of executions in 2017 (9) and is more than twofold increase from the total number of executions in 2016, which stands at four.

M Ravi, an international human rights lawyer who has been representing clients on death row for almost 15 years now had this to say about the executions this week:

“Though we were tragically unable save Selamat Bin Paki this morning, I hope the government will take immediate steps to impose a moratorium on death penalty by staving off the two impending executions this Friday in line with what Malaysia had recently done towards abolishing the death penalty. Quite rightly, Malaysia has acknowledged that death penalty does not serve as a deterrence. Our leadership needs the courage to recognise this, put aside its ego and do the right thing.”

Malaysian Law Minister Liew Vui Keong told reporters in Kuala Lumpur that he received news of Prabu’s imminent execution only this morning (24 October 2018) and shared that he intends to pen a letter to the Singapore Government to halt Prabu’s execution. He added that he plans to work with the Foreign Ministry on this issue. When asked what would happen if the execution were to be carried out, he replied “That will be a sad thing. I hope they won’t.”

Anti-death penalty activists in Singapore will be organising a  candlelight vigil for both Prabu and Irwan tomorrow evening at 7.30pm at Hong Lim Park. More information on the vigil can be found at this link.

TOC will update this article as the story develops.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP’s Leong Mun Wai speaks in Japanese to media query on Singapore PMETs

The assistant secretary-general of Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Leong Mun Wai answered…

SDP proposes to revamp education system to cultivate creative and critical thinking individuals

Education is the bedrock of every successful civilisation and Singapore is no…

环境局与宜家携手推广 一万八千户将获回收箱兑换券

新政府组屋区月1万8000名组屋居民将会获得新加坡宜家赞助的免费回收箱的优惠券,并可以在本月24日进行兑换。 该倡议有国家环境局和新加坡宜家分行发起,旨在鼓励更多家庭做出正确回收和定期回收,使废物更容易被回收利用。 回收箱允许住户在家中累积可回收物品,并且可以作为鼓励定期和正确回收习惯培养的视觉提醒。 新加坡环境与水源部(MEWR)早在去年进行了一项住家回收调查,发现有60巴仙的新加坡家庭定期进行回收工作。 据当局指出,方便度被认为是回收利用的重要因素。受访者还透露,不进行回收的最常见原因,是因为他们认为可回收的物品太少了。 此外,环境局指出,调查结果还显示了习惯在住户回收行为中,起到主要的作用。当一个人的生活状况或环境发生变化,如搬进新家时,新的习惯和惯例更容易被培养。新房主也包括在此行列中,因为他们可能更容易改变惯例,且建立新的回收习惯。 采纳民众反馈制作回收箱 当局还在今年2月至3月期间,与各行业的民众进行了六次焦点小组讨论,以了解他们对三种回收容器类型,即贴钩、标准S字形钩和纸箱的偏好,以便能够成为家中定期回收的最佳容器。纸箱成为了人们的最佳选择。一般而言,受访者推荐耐用、可清洗、多功能性且中性色的回收容器。 这些反馈都被列入考量并且进一步改进后,形成了现有的回收容器。新加坡宜家所提供的回收箱采用了60巴仙的再生塑料制成,其设计可轻松融入任何家庭。每个回收箱都有一个突出的蓝色回收标签,附带有用的回收小秘方,如确保可回收物品如瓶子和容器不含有食物和液体,且回收前进行冲洗。 根据可回收物的数量,一个典型的家庭可将回收物品累积最少数天,然后在方便的时候,才将这些回收物品放入蓝色回收箱,或者在公共楼层的回收槽中。 当局也将在回收箱兑换期间,发放冰箱磁铁,以知会住户们可回收和不可回收的物品。 在接下来的数月内,符合条件的新政府组屋区,如麦波申、比达达利、三巴旺和盛港等地区的组屋居民,将透过邮件获得他们的优惠券。每张优惠券均可到淡滨尼或亚历山大的宜家进行兑换,已索取免费的回收箱。…