Residential downtown in Singapore from Shutterstock.com

Look at the outcomes Singapore has achieved, Social and Family Development Minister Desmond Lee has urged. This was his response to a report by United Kingdom-based charity organisation Oxfam which ranked Singapore among the bottom 10 countries in the world at tackling inequality.

The Minister is right on point. Outcomes are what matters and outcomes are precisely what Singaporeans have been concerned with for years.

The government touts home ownership, help schemes and safety nets, GST vouchers and Medisave top-ups, but the outcomes right before our eyes are that hordes of senior citizens have to slog so hard for so little well into their twilight years. They are the old men and old women we see everyday as cleaners, servers, security guards, tissue sellers, and scrap and cardboard collectors.

These are the tangible outcomes of the rich-poor gap – the rich get richer and the poor have to continue working till their bodies cannot take it anymore because they have to continue paying and paying.

As a friend remarked recently: “In the past one person could support a household of five, today five children cannot even support one aged parent.” The is the outcome of the government’s failure to address the inequality and the rich-poor disparity.

Another tangible statistic we can look at is that despite decades of work, about 50% of Singaporeans cannot even meet the CPF full minimum sum at the age of 55.

Singapore has stubbornly bucked the trend among developed countries, refusing to set a poverty line. The government has said it is better to have a flexible approach in helping the needy through a combination of schemes and not be tied down to a poverty line because people may still fall through the cracks.

In Hong Kong, about one-fifth of the population fall below the poverty line it set in 2013. Singapore could be in a similar situation. Research has shown that up to 20% of resident households here have to get by with less than $1,500 a month.

Last year, there were statistics showing that the top 20% own 73% of Singapore’s wealth and the bottom 20% own just 1% of the overall wealth.

So if Minister Desmond Lee wants to focus on outcomes, they are all there for him to look at. It’s precisely outcomes that Singaporeans have been looking at and talking about for years.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AMP Responds to Comments by MM Lee in his new book

This is the English version of Association of Muslim Professionals’ official response…

“拍到捡纸皮老妇时下着雨” 青年质问难道只是“活动筋骨”?

本周一(7日),一名青年格瓦拉(Vladimir Guevarra)在脸书分享,他在上月26日骑脚车经过中峇鲁英云街,却发现一辆保时捷在倒车,似乎无视车后方有驼背的白发老妇,推着一大叠纸皮。 这位青年见状立即大喊注意,所幸邻近肉铺的老板娘也察觉到,立即示意车主停下。格瓦拉同情看上去很疲惫的老妇,便自掏腰包给了些零钱让她买晚餐。 格瓦拉的帖文立即引起网民们注意和广传,网络媒体也竞相报导分享。许多网友关心老妇并愿意提供协助,令格瓦拉感到欣慰。 其中,本地素食摊兼志愿组织Mummy Yummy也前往寻访这位查姓老妇,并获悉老妇由儿子照顾,总理的属下也有经常探访她。 志工鼓励民众帮忙老妇推车 Mummy Yummy指出,老妇婉拒了社会服务中心等组织的援助,不过每三个月仍有领取乐龄补贴。该组织联系上查姓老妇儿子,以安排做家访以及了解是否需提供伙食。 志工们虽劝说老妇放弃捡纸皮,不过最终妥协,允许老妇在照顾自身健康和道路安全下,继续这么做。 不过,该组织也鼓励,如果在路上有发现这位老妇,可以帮忙她推载着纸皮的手推车,这样至少能减少老妇工作时间和负担。 Mdm…

吴家和邀下月14日 露宿一晚体验街友处境

本地社运分子吴家和(Gilbert Goh),在个人脸书发起一项活动:邀请群众在下月14日晚(周六)11时至隔日凌晨6时,体验街友露宿街头的生活,亲身感受本地街友的处境。 吴家和提及,大部分国人很庆幸仍有温暖的家园,可以在舒适的床褥上就寝,不过仍有约千名本地人,被迫露宿长达数周、乃至有者已长期露宿多年。 根据此前国立大学进行的统计,仍有近千人在新加坡流落街头。其中六成的人表示自己正在就业,如清洁工或兼职,不到一半的人固定月入560元至3000元不等。而其中受访的四名街友,已露宿超过20多年。 有街友露宿长达20年 根据吴家和在脸书分享的贴文,他表示现场只会提供纸皮、睡袋、被单和瓶装水,他解释,在他所遇到的一些街友,睡觉时冰冷地上就只铺着一片纸皮。 “在我曾旅居些年的悉尼,一些公司总裁每年会在寒冬夜晚聚集,体验街友生活,与非政府组织合作募款。” 吴家和也经营失业者互助网站 Transitioning.org,积极为失业者发声。 计划的露宿体验地点暂定于劳明达或武吉士一带,他表示如果当晚能募得款项更佳。有兴趣者可电邮给吴家和报名或了解详情:[email protected]。 一些网民也立即在脸书留言表达参与意愿,也有者建议可邀请政党领袖参与,才能让他们理解基层的问题。 无独有偶,另一非政府组织“乐于助人”(Happy People…

Power concedes nothing without demand

by Remy Choo Zhengxi ST Editor-at-Large, Han Fook Kwang, writes (from behind…