Entrance of State court (Photo – Terry Xu).

A staff sergeant with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) was charged on Thursday (27 September) with 33 charges, including 13 counts of wrongful communication of information under the Official Secrets Act, and four counts of corruptly accepting sexual gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) shared that Chin Peng Sum, 51, was charged with four counts of accepting sex from two Chinese nationals, Zhu Shirong and Wang Chenghong.

He was reported to agree to recommend the extension of their Special Pass, which allows mid-level skilled staff to work in Singapore. Applicants have to earn at least $2,200 a month and have relevant qualifications and work experience.

The man also faces two counts of abetment for instigating Wang and another woman, Tang Yuanyuan, to delete incriminatory text messages exchanged between them and him, in which he had warned of impending raids, and telling them to do the same. The messages were in connection with an ongoing investigation against him.

Chin was also charged with one count of obstructing the course of justice by deleting 37 incriminatory text messages exchanged between Zhu and him.

The authority then added that Chin also allegedly tipped off Zhu, Wang, Tang and another woman known as Yan Yan about impending raids by an enforcement agency to prevent them from being arrested for vice-related and immigration offences.

Chin was charged with 13 counts of communicating information he was not authorised to, and another 13 counts of obstructing the course of justice for this matter.

After the trial, Chin and his wife Lee Lay Chin, 40, were seen holding hands as they walked out of the State Courts.

The man then spoke to the media, saying that he has been suspended indefinitely from the ICA.

Chin will be back in court on 25 October, with bail set at $5,000.

His lawyer S. Govindaraju said the charges were served only on Tuesday. However, he noted that Chin has not yet decided whether to claim trial or plead guilty, as they will need time to look into the matter.

CPIB in its statement, stressed that it is a serious offence for public officers to act in their own interests and use their position to solicit corrupt benefits and that the country adopts a zero-tolerance approach towards corruption.

“CPIB takes a serious view of any corrupt practices and will not hesitate to take action against any party involved in such acts,” it added.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police released and repatriated two ISA detainees after finding no evidence on their alleged offences

Sohag Ibrahim and Islam Shariful, two out of the eight Bangladeshi who…

RM109,000 school aid stolen from Malaysian school headmaster’s car

SELANGOR, MALAYSIA— A school headmaster was shocked to find that the RM109,000…

Mikhy Farrera-Brochez jailed in US over Singapore HIV data leak

An American man who leaked confidential details of thousands of HIV-positive people…

Conflict of interest in Tangaraju’s case raises questions about Singapore’s legal system

Singapore executed Tangaraju Suppiah, 46, on Wednesday despite international appeals to halt the execution and review its use of capital punishment. Concerns were raised about the fairness of Tangaraju’s trial after human rights lawyer Mr M Ravi revealed a potential conflict of interest. In a Facebook post on Thursday evening, Mr Ravi expressed horror at discovering that Justice Steven Chong, who presided over Tangaraju’s appeal on Tuesday, was also the Attorney General (AG) when Tangaraju was charged on 19th May 2014. Justice Chong assumed the position of AG between 25 June 2012 to 24 June 2014. This apparent conflict of interest or appearance of biasness raises serious concerns about the fairness of the trial, as well as questions about the correct legal procedure. Mr Ravi stated in his Facebook post, “This is a travesty of justice. This is precisely the reason why a lawyer needs to be present at all stages. It is tragic that not only Tangaraju had no counsel but also did not even have a hearing where Steven J had dismissed the case summarily on Tuesday. We need answers.” The lack of legal counsel, interpreter, and circumstantial evidence against Tangaraju added to the troubling aspects of the case. Despite pleas for clemency, the execution proceeded, marking the 12th since last year.