In the midst of the public uproar over some of the extra exorbitant charges imposed by social enterprise operators on hawkers, Senior Minister of State for Environment and Water Resources Amy Khor said yesterday (7 Sep) that the Government will continue to observe and evaluate the alternative social enterprise hawker management model.

NEA started this management model in 2015 to let hawker centres run by third-party social enterprise operators in the hope of making hawker food more affordable to Singaporeans. The operators are supposed to be socially conscious and responsible to improve operational efficiency while ensuring affordable food for the public.

However, as revealed by Makansutra founder KF Seetoh in his recent blog, hawkers at these social enterprise hawker centres were charged with dubious extra service fees on top of their stall rental. The fear is that more hawkers will push the extra hawker food costs onto consumers, making Singaporeans’ lives already miserable to become impossible.

At present, there are 7 hawker centres run by social enterprise enterprises:

  1. Ci Yuan Hawker Centre
  2. Our Tampines Hub Hawker Centre
  3. Yishun Park Hawker Centre
  4. Jurong West Hawker Centre
  5. Bukit Panjang Hawker Centre
  6. Kampung Admiralty Hawker Centre
  7. Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre

For example, at Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre run by NTUC Foodfare, it was revealed that hawkers were charged a whole bunch of ancillary charges amounting to more than $2,000, a lot more than their rental:

  1. S&CC Charges – $350 per month
  2. Table Cleaning Service – $550 per month
  3. Dishwashing Service – $850 per month
  4. Rental of Cashless System – $150 per month
  5. Food Waste Recycling Management – $40 per month
  6. Concept and Marketing – $300 per month

They also have to pay and participate in the use of common crockery and cutlery at the hawker centre including yearly replacement and replenishment. In addition, they must buy gas from NTUC Foodfare’s own supplier. Unable to bear the costs, at least 10 out of the 40-odd stalls have thrown in the towel at Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre.

Amy Khor: Managing agents must inform NEA of additional services to hawkers

Yesterday (7 Sep), while touring the ‘Our Tampines Hub Hawker Centre’ with her entourage, Dr Amy Khor told the reporters, “Indeed we are very mindful that we need to ensure that hawkers have a decent livelihood … In addition to lower rental and total operating costs, we give more weight to those who offer lower costs.”

“We also make sure that managing agents are not allowed to increase rental or operating costs over the lease period,” she added. She said that the model has only been implemented for three years, and the Government is still learning and evaluating it.

“We will continue to evaluate this alternative model, take into account suggestions and feedback on this ongoing process,” she said.

On the additional services offered by managing agents such as the coin exchange service, and the quality control service as offered by Fei Siong Food Management, she explained that they are optional. Managing agents have to inform NEA when they want to offer additional services to hawkers, she said.

However, there is a need to “give some leeway to innovation” which can enhance the management of these social enterprise hawker centres, she added.

Overall, she said that Singaporeans have benefited from the social enterprise management model which has brought about a more vibrant hawker scene and improved dining experience. But if stalls continue to close like in the case of Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre, it will become a “ghost” hawker centre vibrant only to the spirits.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

每七人中有一人患病 国民心理健康应受关注

官委议员王丽婷(Anthea Ong)指出,国民拥有健康心理,是一个持续发展国家和整个政府应优先关注的项目,并且意识到除了经济增长和物质享受,主观幸福感也是生活素质关键之一。 身为社会企业家的她,在本周三参与国会2019年财长预算案辩论会上指出,人口老化和气候变化是新加坡所面临的的长期挑战,而已经存在的心理健康,则是迄今未正面讨论的课题。 “必须不断问责国家政策和支出,是否能使得我国人民做好迎接未来挑战的准备以及对未来的信心。” 在她致辞中,也分享了12年前,即便在事业上取得成功,她也面对抑郁症中而死里逃生的经验;还有她所所认识拥有心理健康问题的人士,例如正接受抑郁症治疗却几乎自杀的同事、一个自妻子去世后就睡在组屋底层的邻居;一名德士司机全家在吃早餐时,他80多岁的父亲企图跳楼;还有她那年少侄儿,也被诊断患有抑郁症和焦虑症。 国民心理健康问题加剧 王丽婷指出,并不是只有她的侄儿出现如斯症状,很多新加坡青少年也在寻求心理治疗。 她披露,在过去三年,介于16岁至30岁,向心理健康研究所(IMH)社区健康评估小组求助的国民,人数增加了190巴仙。 拨打求救(SOS)热线的5岁至9岁儿童人数,在不到三年的时间增加了5倍以上。 自杀成为了10岁至29岁年龄层的首个主要死亡原因。 涉及各年龄阶层 她也指出,根据2018年12月的新加坡心理健康研究显示,新加坡的年轻一辈,是最容易患有精神障碍的群体。…

Palm oil giant Wilmar caught in forest scandal – Greenpeace

Household brands such as P&G, Reckitt Benckiser and Mondelez exposed to tiger…

罗厘脚车争道 司机否认撞骑士

遭脚车骑士挡道,罗厘司机鸣笛示意对方让路,骑士也不满地打落罗厘的左侧镜,自己随后也被撞倒在路旁草坪上。 但是在面控时,罗厘司机却表示自己没有触碰到脚踏车,否认涉及鲁莽驾驶。 有关事件发生于去年12月22日,当时58岁的张胜仲,和35岁的英国籍脚车骑士张豪宇,在巴西立第三通道和巴西立坡交界处发生冲突,两人在事后,于今年1月皆被控上庭。 然而张胜仲面对的控状,于今年三月份,遭控方将从原本的“疏忽行为”修改为更严重的“鲁莽驾驶”,指控他突然左转罗厘并撞上脚车司机,导致对方自脚车上摔下,倒在草坪上。 据《刑事法典》,疏忽行为导致他人生命受危害可被判入狱不超过六个月、或罚款不超过2500元、或两者兼施;而鲁莽驾驶刑法则是疏忽行为的一倍,即罚款不超过5000元、入狱不超过一年、或两者兼施。 供证人指罗厘曾越界 张胜仲表示不认罪,并且没有接触到脚踏车,只是查案人员陈俊严指出,张胜仲所驾驶的罗厘当时曾一度越过分界线,再从隔壁车道左转向脚踏车骑士。 身为控方第一个供证人的陈俊严也法庭上投放出三段行车记录的画面,以证实其说辞。 惟,张胜仲的代表律师对此表示,其被告人当时听到类似有东西被压碎的声音,而且也听到右边德士鸣笛,以为已经撞到德士了,所以才左转。 而张胜仲始终坚持,他的罗厘并没有和脚踏车接触。 另外,张胜仲也因为没有在事发24小时内报案,因此触犯公共交通法令,一旦罪成将可被罚款不超过一千元,或者坐牢不超过三个月。

Is PAP simply implementing last minute sweeteners to ensure that alternative parties do not gain ground?

Member of Parliament (MP) for West Coast Group Representative Constituency (GRC), S…