Last month, BBC reported that international audit firm KPMG has been severely criticised by UK watchdog, the Financial Reporting Council (‘KPMG’s audit work unacceptable, says watchdog‘, 18 Jun).

The UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is an independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance and reporting to foster investment in UK. Its board of directors is appointed by the UK Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. FRC plays a crucial role in the oversight and development of corporate governance standards such as the UK Corporate Governance Code and standards for the accounting industry.

UK FRC said that KPMG audits had shown an “unacceptable deterioration” and will be subject to closer supervision.

Every year, the UK FRC reviews the audits of Britain’s biggest companies to ensure they meet certain standards. The FRC noted problems at other auditing firms too, but KPMG was specially singled out for the poor quality of its work.

“There has been an unacceptable deterioration in quality at one firm, KPMG,” the FRC said in a statement. “50% of KPMG’s FTSE 350 audits required more than just limited improvements, compared to 35% in the previous year.”

The increased scrutiny of KPMG will now involve the FRC inspecting 25% more audits done by the firm in the 2018-19 financial year, the first time the FRC has taken such action, BBC reported.

KPMG acknowledged the deterioration of its audit and said that it is taking “action to resolve this”. It was especially criticised over its audit of UK construction firm Carillion, which collapsed earlier this year. FRC has opened an investigation into the KPMG group under the Audit Enforcement Procedure.

KPMG was also recently fined £3.2m by FRC over its audit of insurance firm Quindell. Last year, the FRC opened an investigation into KPMG’s audit of the accounts of aero-engine maker Rolls-Royce.

The accounting industry, especially KMPG, has faced a lot of criticism in the last few years over whether their verdicts on companies’ accounts can be trusted, BBC reported.

In Malaysia last month, KPMG also retracted its audit reports on Malaysia’s 1MDB for financial years ended March 2010, 2011 and 2012. KPMG told the company not to rely on its reports over the three years as they don’t show “true and fair” assessment of the troubled state fund’s finances. This came about after the Malaysian opposition won the recent general election in Malaysia and started probing the affairs of 1MDB under the previous Malaysian government.

Temasek uses KPMG

Yesterday (10 Jul), Temasek reported that it has attained a record net portfolio value of S$308 billion and a net cash position for the financial year that ended on 31 March this year.

Temasek’s one-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) was also reported to be 12.19%, with compounded annualised returns of 15% since inception in 1974.

Temasek Chairman, Mr Lim Boon Heng, commented, “Our journey as a generational investor is one that we take with a deep sense of purpose and responsibility; we are committed to do well as an investor, determined to do right as an institution, and inspired to do good as a steward.”

In any case, on its 2018 Financial Report, it listed Temasek’s auditor as KPMG. In the report, Temasek stated that KPMG has expressed “unmodified opinions on the audited statutory consolidated financial statements” of Temasek Holdings and its subsidiaries for the financial year ended 31 Mar 2009 to 2018:

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Blogging seminar this Saturday

Participants to learn tools for better blogging.

Bridge gap in social memory with PIDB: NSP

The following is a press release from the National Solidarity Party on…

民主党上诉要人力部长撤更正指示 维持内堂审理

此前,人力部长援引《防假消息法》对民主党三则文章和网络贴文发出更正指示。民主党要求撤回遭拒绝,于是上诉高庭。民主党争取上诉在公堂(open court)审理。 不过高庭发言人告知本地媒体,在明日(16日)进行的审讯仍维持在内堂审理,意味着不会开放给公众聆听。 根据《防假消息法》的上诉程序规则,若不满要求撤销指示的申请被部长驳回,当事者可透过提呈原诉传票(originating summons)和书面证词(supporting affidavit),上诉高庭。 高庭认为所有原诉传票申诉,都安排在内堂审理,而不是在公堂。 民主党在此前的文告指出,此案涉及公共利益,且《防假消息法》也广受在野党和公民社会的诟病,更何况外籍PMET课题亦牵动国人神经。 故此,该党认为有鉴于上述课题可能成为来届选举的热门议题,希望上诉能在公堂审理,让群众亦有机会旁听。 去年12月14日,人力部援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),向民主党发布的三则贴文和文章发出更正指示。 本月6日,人力部表示“经过谨慎考量”,,认为民主党的申请没有充分理据,故此拒绝撤回指示。不过并未详细解释,民主党的申请为何理据不足。 民主党也不甘示弱回应,人力部也无法为他们的决定提出理据,并指该党提出申请时,已列出详细理由,包括人力部数据分析和该党贴文的对比。