BlueSG: Is electric car sharing really cheaper than other alternatives like Grab and Uber?

by Value Penguin

BlueSG, an electric car sharing service that recently launched in Singapore at the end of 2017, has been making headlines as it already served 5,000 rentals within 3 weeks of operation. It is a service meant to lower the cost of car access that is inflated by things like COE, loans and insurance.

Though its "success" is still in question, especially with a number of reports on damaged, faulty BlueSG cars already, our team at ValuePenguin wanted to examine whether this service is actually economically superior to other options like ride sharing services: can Singaporeans actually save money by sharing electric cars instead of using already-cheap ride hailing services? As always, it seems like the answer isn't a clear yes or no.

BlueSG is very cheap during non-congested hours

One clear advantage that BlueSG has over other, potentially more "convenient" options like Grab or taxis, is that it does not charge a base fare or a distance based fare. Instead, it simply charges a fee of S$0.5 per minute. This difference essentially makes it such that BlueSG is much cheaper than its alternatives when there isn't much traffic causes long delays.

For instance, consider a trip from Raffles Place to Bedok Mall, which is about 15 km apart and should takes around 18 minutes without traffic. Using the pricing data from above, we can calculate that BlueSG is about 30% cheaper than Grab or Uber. The result was roughly the same for trips from Raffles Place to other locations like Woodlands Train Station, Jurong West Swimming Complex, Hougang Mall or Tanjong Pagar Centre, as we demonstrate below.

Uber or Grab could be cheaper during congested hours

However, we actually found that Grab and Uber could be cheaper than BlueSG when the traffic is bad and the roads are congested. For example, what if a drive from Raffles Place to Bedok Mall actually took 70% longer (30 minutes) because of traffic? In this case, BlueSG cost just as much, if not more than, as ride hailing services like Grab and Uber.

This dynamic occurs because of BlueSG's high per minute cost. Although it doesn't charge a base fair or a distance based fair, BlueSG's time based fair is about 2x higher than that of other services and inflates your cost significantly if you are stuck in traffic and waste time on the road. If the traffic so severe that your trip duration doubles, then ride hailing services could be cheaper than BlueSG by 15-20%.

Hidden costs of BlueSG

Furthermore, BlueSG has a significant cost that is difficult to capture with numbers and calculations: convenience and productivity. First, by driving yourself, you lose the time to work on other things as you could have while riding Uber or Grab. Secondly, since BlueSG is a one-way car-sharing service, you must park the car at one of its parking stations at the end of each ride.

This means that you actually have to make the extra effort to get to parking station to begin your trip and to your ultimate destination from the parking lot after your ride. This could easily add extra 10-20 minutes on your trips if you are lucky enough to have BlueSG's 30+ locations near your place of origin or destination; if not, then BlueSG may not even be a viable mode of transportation for you at all. If an average person makes $8 to S$10 per hour, then the time spent while driving and going to & from the parking lots could theoretically erase most of the savings.

That's not all. Given that BlueSG still has a very limited set of operational experience, it still has a lot to figure out, like how to ensure all the cars are well serviced and are in good condition or how to maintain a sufficiently sized fleet so that its customers can always find a car when they need one. It would be difficult to predict or the quantify the true cost of frustration and other complications that could result from not being able to find a properly working car when you really need one.

Still, BlueSG's could potentially be a difference maker, especially its annual plan

Still, BlueSG is a much cheaper alternative to owning cars. Previously, we estimated that owning a car costs roughly around S$15,000 per year (including cost of petrol, insurance, loans and maintenance), while using Grab everyday could cost about S$13,000 annually.

In comparison, BlueSG could cost just about S$10,000 for an average driver who spends roughly 21,000 minutes on the road covering 17,500km per year (roughly averaging 50km per hour). Saving S$3,000 to S$5,000 per year could be a game changer for those who don't mind the extra hassle associated with using a BlueSG car instead of his own car or an on-demand service.

Furthermore, BlueSG has an annual subscription plan that lowers its price by 34% to S$0.33 per minute, which would definitely make it more affordable than ride sharing services regardless of traffic conditions.

Cost-conscious consumers would be wise to wait and observe if BlueSG is able to provide a dependable service and convenient access; if it does, it has a real chance in being a real difference maker for frequent drivers in Singapore to lower their transportation costs significantly without making a big sacrifice.

This was first published at Value Penguin's website, "BlueSG: Is Electric Car Sharing Really Cheaper Than Other Alternatives like Grab and Uber?".

This entry was posted in Transport.
This entry was posted in Transport.