Source: Channel NewsAsia screengrab video.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his delivery of his speech during the People’s Action Party (PAP) convention held on Sunday at Big Box in Jurong, said that raising taxes is not a matter of whether but when.

Speaking to 2000 PAP activists, he said that the investment for economy and infrastructure and the spending on social services and safety nets are all necessary and worthwhile.

“There are a vote of confidence in Singapore in the future, just like our forefathers have saved and invested to build what this generation are enjoying today,” he stated.

So he said that to this generation, “We must plant trees in order our sons and daughters and their sons and daughters will be able to enjoy the shade.”

He then noted that the investment and social spending are costly and we have to make them that we afford them.

“Government spending has gone up and we look ahead, it will rise further. So we have to stretch our dollars and make every dollar count,” he stressed.

For this current Government, he said that they have enough revenue.

“But, our spending needs will grow. So, Heng Swee Kat was right when he said that raising taxes is not a matter of whether but when,” he said.

He then stressed that the Government needs to prepare for the raise, saying, “Well, before that time comes, we have to plan ahead, explain to Singaporeans what the money is needed for and how the money we earn and we spend will benefit everyone, young and old.”

This potentially means that Singaporeans can expect a tax hike pretty soon just like when PM Lee announced that there is a need to relook at the Elected Presidency. The matter will be brought up in Parliament and passed through without much resistance due to the overwhelming number of PAP Members of Parliament.

Many commenters took to the comment section of news reports to critise unofficial announcement of a tax hike by the Prime Minister.

Some took issues with the high pay of the top civil servants and ministers, asking if the Government will cut off salary of the ministries to reduce the expenditure of the government.

Jezsline Cheow wrote, “Instead of raising taxes, please cut the salaries of all ministers including the president by 40%. After the cut, the ministers here are still the most top paid in the world. Please stop sucking blood from your citizens, we have nothing left except bones and a broken soul.”

Tan Ben Jornee wrote, “Salary cut first then we discuss.”

Alvin Peh wrote, “Says the country leader of the highest paid cabinet. Top 20 highest salaried politicians of the world plus up to 18-23 months bonuses not including incentives and perks. Even US president and China president is no where near such level of corr. Instead of finding ways to suck from the citizens they should however be thinking ways to grow the economy and create employment and fixing transportation issues. Ironically they find fixing the oppositions a higher priority.”

Chua Heng Da wrote, “Why dun u cut ur pay instead? Or only raise taxes on the super rich only instead? Your indefnite raising of tax is straining the middle class who forms up the most important pillars of Singapore. They just make enough to survive and yet is not receiving enough support as the poors.”

Liew Rui Qink wrote, “Can you stop increasing the minister’s salary and cut down the salary. It will help perhaps 15-30 percent of the GDP contributions. We are fine contributing the taxes as long as each of these so called government officials are fairly paid like most senior management jobs out there. In government service, it supposed to be a calling to serve people, not to model it like a profit centre.

I just want to share that a lot of companies are letting go their senior management or staff and rather employ fresh graduates or foreigners to reduce their expenses. A lot of senior people are downgrading and striving to survive in this high cost societies. Please evaluate the income bracket before you increase taxes. The bulk majority of locals in senior positions are retrenched if not asked to leave for some stupid reason. I feel sad for them.”

Alson Hun wrote, “If you still have a little bit of conscience in you, instead of raising taxes, please take a pay cut in your salaries. The kpi of some of your ministry isn’t up to expectation and they should take a pay cut. The cost of living standard in Singaporeans is getting higher and higher.”

 

Some stated that different moves should be taken instead as many middle and low-class Singaporeans are dying to earn a living.

Hilal Lal wrote, “They should revise the tax not raising up. Low income and middle class are struggling to cope with the daily expenses plus monthly bills. A vote of confidence?!”

Chua Heng Da wrote, “Why don’t you cut your pay instead? Or only raise taxes on the super rich only instead? Your indefinite raising of tax is straining the middle class who forms up the most important pillars of Singapore. They just make enough to survive and yet is not receiving enough support as the poors.”

Mr Kiong Sham noted that citizens are already paying high taxes, but in the form of indirect taxes, “That’s the problem with PAP. They give you $100 and say the government spent millions and they take it back from you in so many form of indirect taxes. COE, 30 percent water price hike, penalties for this and that. The world thinks that Singapore has one of the lowest taxes rates but most people don’t realize we pay a lot of indirect taxes.

Thomas Wong wrote, “Stop taxing the poor and the retired with GST increase. Increase the income tax of those earning above a quarter of a million dollars.”

Noordin Mohd wrote, “Liao lo; habis lo; we have to pay so much for food, commodities, housing, water and electricity consumption, etc, etc and now the icing on the cake – tax. Next on line will be the GST. In this case the Government is taxing you until your pants drop. Once he opened his mouth the increase will be inevitable.”

Some asked the government to stop building unnecessary stuff.

Muhd Hali Ridzkin wrote, “It is never enough for you guys, isn’t it. Everyday the low ground people are suffering to meet the daily needs. If indeed you have a lot of money stop building unnecessary stuffs.”

Ken Ho wrote, “I think the government should look into how monies are spent instead. Beautified my estate blocks with useless enhancement without practical use and now tearing all down because of a panel that dropped off the roof. There are at least 30 blocks.
Paved a new road after completion of circle line only to close it in less than a year to construct the DTL.
Building and tearing down bus stop at the same spot at least 3 times perhaps within 5 years.”

On the other hand, some people agreed with the suggested tax raises.

Aravin wrote, “Don’t know why so many people complaining, Singapore’s income tax is already very low, and only the rich people will be affected the most since they are they ones taxed heavily compared to those who make $40,000 and people a year and pay $550 in taxes and even those earning $120,000 only pay 7950 in taxes which is just 6.6 percent. Really how many Singaporeans actually make more than $120,000 a year. Definitely not the majority.”

Jason Tan wrote, “With more social support program, it’s natural to increase the tax. Not going to be popular but a necessary thing to do. Only a strong government dare to take such move. If we have others, no one will dare to do it and the country will slowly gone bankrupt.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

$650,000 donation made to Singapore self-help groups by Goh Keng Swee Foundation on 11th anniversary of Dr Goh’s passing

To commemorate the 11th anniversary of Dr. Goh Keng Swee’s passing (14…

与公司旗下客工共处一室 再有雇主申诉:有客工确诊未被安排隔离!

再有雇主公开在脸书申诉,客工宿舍内有客工确诊后未被安排隔离,继续和其他健康客工共处一室! 雇主苏女士(Christy Soo)前日在脸书透露,自己公司属下的客工住在大士南宿舍。6月15日,一名非公司客工迁入和她的雇员同住,而自己此前就已向宿舍经营者抗议,不该让不同公司的客工同住。 不幸的是,上述这名客工在7月24日被通知确诊,然而迄今还是和其他客工同住一室。苏女士立即联系宿舍经营者,但对方却让她等候,之后苏女士也联系了卫生部和前线保障支援小组(FAST)。 不过苏女士得知的答案,是上述客工的雇主,叫这名客工继续待在同一房间。 旗下客工自4月份就遵守防疫安全措施 而根据苏女士在25日更新的资讯,自己旗下的五名客工也确诊,令她直呼这批员工从4月份遵守当局规定的防疫措施至今,如今却无辜受牵连! “我还告诉这些员工,如果他们遵守安全措施且为被感染,七月份就可上班。”如今这批客工还面对与其他公司确诊客工共处一室的风险,而苏女士的公司。还是要继续支付旗下客工的劳工税、薪资和住宿等却无法复工,不论是雇员和雇主都感到恐惧。 “我们重复发电邮、拨电似乎都得不到能厘清我们焦虑的答案,”而他的贴文也点名人力部、联合领导跨政府部门工作小组的黄循财部长,以及即将接任国家发展部的李智陞。 据苏女士指出,她在6月17日曾向人力部要求,把旗下客工转移到他们公司安排的住所,不过人力部告知只有康复确诊客工会被转移。 本月中旬,就有雇主爆料旗下客工确诊后还和其他11室友共处一室,未被立即安排隔离;7月19日卫生部和人力部才联合发文告,承认出现“行政疏失”(administrative error),迟至三周后才通知雇主有客工确诊,并为此道歉。…

Singpost's ex-CEO appointed a number of foreign talents from his ex-company to key posts in Singpost

It was earlier reported that two US e-commerce units of Singpost, Jagged…

电视论坛与人民互动 网民对财长回答大不满

新加坡财政部长王瑞杰在星期一(2月18日)发布2019年预算案后,他于星期二(2月19日)出席了一个预算案电视论坛,让民众有机会就预算案内容向部长提问。 长约一小时的论坛中,王瑞杰听取民众提出有关各种主题的问题,例如相关的预算案好似一个大选预算案、立国一代配套(Merdeka Generation Package)如何鼓励保持身心健康活跃的生活,以及新加坡的出生率。其他民众也表达了他们对高昂生活费,以及中产阶级缺乏福利保障一事表示担忧。 超过500留言表达不满 有关的电视论坛在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书上直播。留言区充满了网友向部长提出各种项目的问题,以及他们对王瑞杰的回答表示不满。 在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书直播过程中,共获得超过500个留言,许多人质问公积金的提款年龄。失望的是,有关的问题并没有得到解答,因为并没有现场观众对王瑞杰提问此事。 质疑消费税增加 在发表2019预算案时,王瑞杰表示政府计划在未来数年,将消费税从7巴仙调高至9巴仙。针对这个事项,一位市民提问道,政府是否能吸纳食物等必需品的消费税。王瑞杰回答说:“在我们推出消费税前,我们已经非常仔细地研究过这个项目。最近这个课题再次引起争议后,我又在研究了一遍”。 然而网民对此回答并没有感到很满意,他们质疑消费税的调涨,甚至呼吁废除消费税。 财案没照顾中产阶级 除此之外,有民众表示新加坡的生活费持续增长,他问财政部长,政府是否会采取一些措施,帮助没有被纳入立国一代配套的群体。王瑞杰指出,政府需要保持成本低廉,这是很重要的,而且可以通过很多方式来达到这一目标,例如拥有一个开放和具有竞争力的系统,来自世界各地的进口货物,以及保持一个强壮的经济体。…