Straits Times prepping the public that 2 of the presidential hopefuls will not qualify?

I refer to the article “Halimah Yacob submits application to contest presidential election” (Straits Times, Aug 31).

The article writes that “Now that Madam Halimah has submitted her forms, it is up to the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) to decide whether there will be a contest, or a walkover."

ST further noted that Madam Halimah is the only aspiring candidate to automatically qualify so far, having served as Speaker of Parliament for more than three years as a candidate from the public sector, while noting the two other hopefuls, Second Chance Properties chief executive Salleh Marican, 67, and Bourbon Offshore Asia Pacific chairman Farid Khan, 62, fall short of the criteria for private sector candidates.

ST writes, "Mr Salleh’s investment holdings and retail firm had equity of between $254.3 million and $263.25 million in the past three financial years, while Mr Farid’s offshore marine firm reportedly has equity of about US$300 million, or S$408.5 million.The PEC, however, has the discretion to allow a candidate, who does not automatically meet the criteria, to contest.”

Under the new amendments passed in Parliament this year. Both candidates must have run a company with at least $500 million in shareholder equity, on average, for the most recent three years.

"Thus, unless the PEC decides to use its discretion to allow one or both of the other two candidates to contest, despite their not meeting the $500 million criteria – it is likely that there may be a walkover on 13 September. If so, this would be the third walkover in Singapore’s history." points out ST.

Are there any other countries in the world that has walkovers in their presidential elections?

Is our mainstream media (ranked 151st for Press Freedom in the world) arguably, preparing Singaporeans for possibly, the obvious foregone conclusion on 13 September?

In the two contested elections – Mr Ong Teng Cheong (1993) and Mr Tony Tan (2011) won by 58.7 per cent (winner’s majority: 17.4%) and 35.2 per cent (winner’s majority: 0.34%), respectively.

Given the widespread unease amongst Singaporeans – even if there is a walkover – shouldn’t there be at least an affirmation vote by the people, as suggested by Prof Kevin Y L Tan?

Editor's note – It is our view that Farid Khan ought to qualify if  he is being extended the same relaxation of criteria given to Presidential candidate, Tan Jee Say in the Presidential Election 2011. However, we are of the view that the PEC will disqualify both because the establishment will likely not want make a risk with an one-on-one election, given that President Ong Teng Cheong nearly lost to a dummy candidate and President Tony Tan would have lost in a straight fight with Dr Tan Cheng Bock in PE2011.

This entry was posted in Opinion.
This entry was posted in Opinion.