Second Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong

Minister of National Development, Lawrence Wong posted a Facebook post on Friday late afternoon to state that it was normal, and in order, for Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to be given the deed in his official capacity.
Just this week, Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)  posted a letter from PM Lee’s lawyer showing that Mr Lucien Wong, who is PM Lee’s personal lawyer and the current Attorney General, had informed him that his client, PM Lee had received a copy of the Deed of Gift which was earlier denied by him and his sister, LWL on 12 June 2015. According to LHY, it was a matter of just a few hours before Mr Wong, PM’s personal lawyer wrote to inform them, “Our client has since received a copy of the Deed of Gift dated 8 June 2015 from NHB.”
LHY questioned in his post, “Did LHL acquire the Deed of Gift in his public capacity, or his private capacity? If in his public capacity, to use this in his personal legal disputes is a clear abuse of authority. If in his private capacity, how can other private citizens go about acquiring confidential deeds of gift from the NHB?”
The Minister explains in his post that the deed of gift which LHY was referring to, relates to items from the estate of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, for use in a major public exhibition by the NHB concerning Singapore’s founding leaders. Noting that such a major public exhibition on Singapore founding leaders is a matter for deliberation by the Government, Mr Wong wrote that the Prime Minister was kept informed about the contents and presentation of the exhibition and given the deed in his official capacity, so as to be normal and in order.
The Minister then went on to note that if PM Lee had asked for the information in his private capacity, he would have been entitled to know about the exhibition and the items from the estate, given his position as the eldest son of LKY and beneficiary of the estate.
But for some reasons, Mr Wong brought in the issues about his concerns over the display of the partial quote of the demolition clause from LKY’s will which was part of the conditions set by the executors of the will for the loan to NHB.
In response to the Minister’s post, LHY wrote a Facebook post stating that the Minister is not telling the whole truth.
LHY states that the Minister omits to mention that the deed of gift was signed with the CEO of NHB on the evening of 8 Jun 2015. NHB accepted the “unusual” conditions. In a collection of what happened, LHY wrote that lorries came to collect the items on 9 Jun 2015, and on the morning of 10 Jun 2015, he received an urgent message from Rosa Daniel (then CEO of NHB) that the Minister had “changed his mind”.
“This was an important gift to the people of Singapore. Someone clearly did not want them reminded of Lee Kuan Yew’s wish to demolish his house.” wrote LHY.

LHY posted a screenshot of the email that was sent to the then NHB CEO about the call he had received on 10 June 2015. In the email, it wrote that the Minister (Lawrence Wong) had made a decision that NHB will not proceed with the Oxley Road component of the exhibition and NHB had breach a legally binding deed less than 49 hours of signing.
In an update to Minister Lawrence Wong’s post, the Minister wrote that he did have initial reservations, but he later decided the exhibition should proceed and it was successfully staged. “Everything I’ve said above is accurate. I’ve given a brief summary of what happened. I’ve said that I will give a fuller account in parliament, and will do so.”
PM Lee has earlier made a public statement to apologise for the dispute between him and his two siblings. Apart from apologising for the matter, he said that he will make a ministerial statement to refute the allegations made against him and will subject himself to questioning by the Members of Parliament on 3 July with party whip lifted for his party.
Ministers who were involved in the matter such as Lawrence Wong and especially those in the “secret” committee to ponder upon the fate of the property at 38 Oxley Road, would most likely be speaking about their involvement and reasons behind the formulation of the committee.
Below is Minister Lawrence Wong’s statement in full

I plan to speak on this in Parliament on 3 July, and clear the air on the matter, as I was then the Minister in charge of MCCY.
But as there are several misperceptions circulating around, I thought it would be better to put out some facts earlier.
The deed of gift relates to items from the estate of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, for use in a major public exhibition by the NHB concerning Singapore’s founding leaders, including our founding Prime Minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew.
Such a major public exhibition on our founding leaders is a matter for deliberation by the Government.
It would therefore be normal and in order, that the Prime Minister be kept informed about the contents and presentation of the exhibition.
The Prime Minister was given the deed in his official capacity.
If Mr Lee Hsien Loong had asked for the information in his private capacity, he would have been entitled to know about the exhibition and the items from the estate, given his position as the eldest son of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew and beneficiary of the estate.
Unlike most donated items to our museums which are covered by NHB’s standard agreement, this deed of gift came with several unusual conditions.
First, the executors of the estate could buy back all the items for $1, so long as 38 Oxley Road was not demolished.
Second, NHB had to display prominently, throughout the exhibition and its publicity materials, part of the demolition clause from Mr Lee’s will regarding his wishes for 38 Oxley Road.
To recap, this is the demolition clause in Mr Lee’s will:
“I further declare that it is my wish, and the wish of my late wife, KWA GEOK CHOO, that our house at 38 Oxley Road, Singapore 238629 (“the House”) be demolished immediately after my death or, if my daughter, Wei Ling, would prefer to continue living in the original house, immediately after she moves out of the House. I would ask each of my children to ensure our wishes with respect to the demolition of the House be carried out.
If our children are unable to demolish the House as a result of any changes in the law, rules or regulations binding them, it is my wish that the House never be opened to others except my children, their families and descendants. My view on this has been made public before and remains unchanged. My statement of wishes in this paragraph 7 may be publicly disclosed notwithstanding that the rest of my Will is private.”
The first part sets out his wish for the House to be demolished.
The second part sets out his wish if the House could not be demolished due to any changes in the law, rules or regulations.
The deed of gift required NHB to display the first part of the demolition clause, but not the second.
I had discussed the matter with DPM Teo Chee Hean then, and we were concerned about the partial quote of the demolition clause from Mr Lee’s will. But we eventually decided not to pursue the matter, and to let NHB proceed with the exhibition.
I was also concerned about the tight timeline that NHB had to operate in. But the team did an excellent job. The exhibition opened in September 2015, and I attended the opening with Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Ms Lee Wei Ling. It was well received and the exhibition has been extended until now.
I hope this will provide some useful background on what happened with the exhibition and the deed of gift in 2015.
I will give a fuller explanation on the matter in Parliament.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

打了七场选战没在怕 陈清木:担忧的是人民的性命健康

尽管新加坡前进党陈清木医生反对此时选举,但他表示过去打过七场选战,自己畏惧的不是面对选举,而是人们在疫情下的性命健康。 在23日的网络记者会,针对记者提问,陈清木表示,环境局撤回有关该党成员违反社交距离的警告,但他也指出,这也突出冠病疫情下的一个重要面向,并重申此时大选是非常不负责任的。 “我们理应先为人民着想,不幸的是政治已经超越了所有的这些考量。” 陈清木指出,自己打了七场选战,从不畏惧面对,但自己以百姓为优先,世卫组织早已警告疫情复发的风险,为此此时选举实属不明智。 他举例,选举期间每个人都要前往投票站,一个密闭的空间内投票,即使目前提出群聚限五人的限制等等,但他很怀疑这些措施能否有效落实。 他也证实,环境局已告知该党,本周日对该党发出的违规社交距离警告已撤销。 六名前进党成员,是在周日(21日)拜访到武吉巴督31街第358组屋时,被指违反社交距离规定,被记下个人资料。一名安全距离大使,以及一名自称环境局官员的人士,记下他们的个资。 不过后来环境局澄清,上述人员实则是该局的社区志愿者,或培训为保洁大使(SG Clean Ambassador)。  

后港1道有组屋出现肺结核病例 卫生部为同座居民免费检测

后港1道第174D座组屋,过去两年半期间,相继出现四起肺结核病例。卫生部将在后天(26日)起,在摩绵路一带的肺结核控制部门(Tuberculosis Control Unit,简称TBCU),为同座居民提供免费预防性检测。 此举乃是为了侦测还未被确诊的病例。TBCU和国家传染病中心(NCID)的人员,也会在25日(明日)到下周二,走访上述组屋所有单位,鼓励居民接受检测,届时居民可透过人员进行预约,居民可自行选择是否参与检测,或是拨打TBCU热线62484430预约。 2018年1月至2020年6月之间,该组屋楼层不同单位,有四人相继确诊肺结核。其中两人已完成疗程,仍有两名在接受治疗,但已不具传染性。 此前,当局在获悉这些病例后已展开追踪工作,那些有何患者近接触的人士已被安排检测。当时的调查显示,四名病例之间未曾接触过。 不过在本月,当局进行基因排序时,发现上述四例病患有相似的基因组合。除了住同座组屋,并没有其他共同点,他们之间也互不认识、没打过交道,也不曾一同在公共场所聚集。 卫生部文告指出,这不符合肺结核一般的传播方式,因为肺结核通常是透过与患者长期密切接触而感染的。

Netizens feel SingPost needs to buck up their mail delivery services

On 2 January, The Straits Times (ST) published a complaint letter by…

滥用职权软硬兼施 夫妇涉嫌诱骗外国女子卖淫

涉嫌逼迫外国籍原舞女卖淫,并“监禁”另两名外国女子,外籍夫妇被控触犯《防范人口贩卖法令》。 一对印度籍夫妇,即31岁的普丽洋卡(Priyanka Bhattacharya Rajesh)以及其51岁的马尔卡(Malkar Savlaram Anant)被控抵触《妇女宣章》,教唆外籍女子进行卖淫,并没收所有薪金和肉金。 他们也在防范人口贩运法令(Prevention of Human Trafficking Act)下,面对三项控状。 两人皆不认罪,而控方在经过上个月的审讯后,要求法官判他们罪名成立。…