Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has issued a statement to urge Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to convene a Commission of Inquiry on the ongoing dispute between him and his siblings, Dr Lee Weiling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang instead of having the matter debated in Parliament.
The party states that the Parliament is hardly the appropriate forum to conduct an inquiry that will win public confidence in a matter of such national importance.
Highlighting the seriousness of the charges and counter-charges made by those involved – including cabinet ministers – and the grave implications the allegations hold for the future of Singapore, the party urges the PM to call for a forum that is beyond reproach in its service of truth and fairness.
Earlier today, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, a former People’s Action Party Member of Parliament also wrote that the Parliament is not the right place to settle family disputes.
“It is an institution to make laws and debate national issues.Family disputes should be settled in courts.In parliament MPs have no details of the case and only hear PM telling his side of the case. Wrong platform.” commented Dr Tan.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has earlier made a public statement on Monday evening (19 June) to apologise for the dispute between him and his siblings, Dr Lee Weiling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang.
Apart from apologising for the matter, he said that he will make a ministerial statement in Parliament to refute the allegations made against him and will subject himself to questioning by the Members of Parliament on 3 July with party whip lifted for his party.
On 14 June, PM Lee’s two siblings issued a public statement to express their non confidence in him and wrote that they are worried about Singapore’s future in his hands. They raised several issues in their six-page statement such as the handling of the 38 Oxley Road but most importantly, the two alleged that the PM had abused his official position for personal agenda.
Below is SDP’s statement in full

The matter of PM Lee Hsien Loong’s dispute with his siblings should be heard by a properly convened Commission of Inquiry (COI) rather than be debated in Parliament.
The SDP stated in our media release (15 June 2017) that “PM Lee must address the specific allegations of public concern in a clear and transparent manner. The only way that this can be satisfactorily done is through public hearings.”
Given that the PM is at the centre of the controversy, Parliament is hardly the appropriate forum to conduct an inquiry that will win public confidence in a matter of such national importance.
Instead, a COI like the one held to look into the circumstances surrounding the riot in Little India in 2013 should take place. In that hearing, lapses in the security system were identified and concrete recommendations made to improve it.
If the Government saw the need for a COI over the incident in Little India, what more this matter which has generated intense public angst.
Given the seriousness of the charges and counter-charges made by those involved – including cabinet ministers – and the grave implications the allegations hold for the future of our country, it behooves the PM to call for a forum that is beyond reproach in its service of truth and fairness.
Such an inquiry must necessarily include a body with the power to subpoena all actors and relevant witnesses where they can be questioned under oath. The composition of the panel must, of course, be consistent with the spirit and objective in which the inquiry is conducted.
It must be reiterated that the saga goes well beyond a private family quarrel and crosses into the realm which involves matters at the very heart of transparent and accountable governance.
It is in this light that the SDP urges PM Lee to do the right thing and convene a genuinely impartial hearing to get to the bottom of the incident and, in so doing, reform our nation’s governing process.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court to hold hearing of Prabowo’s legal challenge against Jokowi’s Presidential Election victory on Tuesday

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court has allowed the hearing of opposition former presidential candidate…

Lee Hsien Yang points to AGC’s prosecution of his son and asks, “is this the kind of government that we want?”

Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), younger Brother of Prime Minister Lee Hsien…

蓄意伤人及暴力对待员工 明星律师萧丁明认罪!

“明星律师”萧丁明被控对三名女职员动粗,包括伤害他的外甥女和一名女员工,他今早(7月27日)承认两项罪状。 在去年6月7日,萧丁明(47岁)被控蓄意伤人、动粗及触犯防止骚扰法令四项控状。而受害者分别是在他律师事务所工作的外甥女江欣莹(26岁)、女员工陈珠云,以及在其娱乐公司工作的江佩珊(21岁)。 被告今早面控时,承认了蓄意伤人罪和刑事暴力罪,而其他的控状则交法官考量。 萧丁明和女员工争执的音频于2018年5月曝光,事隔一年后,在2019年4月爆出萧丁明殴打两名女员工,包括其外甥女的视频在网上流传出来,引起法律界关注。 据悉,案发时,江佩珊正准备离开公司,前往活动地点,但是被告因不满她没有完成工作而阻拦。被告直接戳着她的额头大骂,甚至推了她。 身在现场的江欣莹目睹了有关过程,基于害怕受到同样遭遇,就启动了手机的录音功能。 被告之后在办公室内大声询问另一名员工的去向,但是没人回答,被告再次大声斥责。江欣莹过后回应,指该员工在下午4至5时有会议,之后就不知道去向了,但是被告就生气追问,为何刚才不说。 江欣莹当时看着被告趋近,害怕挨打,就双手环胸自保,却不慎碰到被告,令被告顿时失去理智地喊道“你打我,你打我,你竟敢打我”,还把江欣莹推到角落。 推了江欣莹之外,被告还掌掴并怒骂江欣莹,后者也做出反击,甚至打了被告一巴掌。多名在现场的员工都尝试阻拦,江欣莹就趁机跑走了。