(Photo – Terry Xu)

In order to benefit from government assistance in Singapore, some single mothers are taking the drastic measure of adopting their own child.
In a Straits Times report on 11 May, Ms Tan (not her real name), a single parent, started her adoption process last August after she noticed a Facebook page belonging to a support group for single parents.
She said to Straits Times (ST), “I saw a post talking about adoption. One woman left a comment saying that she did it for less than $1,000. So I sent her a message and asked her how she did it.”
What adopting your own child essentially means is that it would ‘normalise’ a family nucleus and allow the child to have all the rights that a child born to a married couple would have. This would include housing, housing subsidies, the Baby Bonus cash gift, tax relief for the parent and inheritance priority.
Under the current Baby Bonus Cash Gift criteria, unwed parents cannot claim cash benefits for their child.

The Baby Bonus Scheme Eligibility check reflects the user system prompting a question – “Are the parents lawfully married?”, and a Yes/No answer before the message below pops up, should the user select a ‘No’.

Similarly, under the Child Development Account (CDA), parents who are not legally married are not eligible for the scheme if their child was born before 1 September 2016.

Under the Statutes of Legitimacy Act written in 1934, the act states that a child born out of wedlock is an illegitimate child. However, if a child is adopted, he/she is treated as he/she was born with parents who are legally married.

Specifically under 7 (1c) of the adoption act, “in respect of the same matters and in respect of the liability of a child to maintain its parents, the adopted child shall stand to the adopter exclusively in the position of a child born to the adopter in lawful wedlock”.
The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) said that cases of unwed parents singly adopting their children are “very few”, adding that the laws in Singapore do not require them to do so.
“Some unwed parents may nonetheless choose to do so, for reasons such as to terminate the rights and responsibilities of the other parent,” MSF said.
Ms Tan told Straits Times that her motivating factor to consider adoption was the Baby Bonus cash gift and the CDA of up to $6,000, which has been extended to children of unwed mothers born from September last year.
Ms Tan said, “That was the push factor. But when I started the journey, I noticed more benefits”.
She also said that one of the chief reasons she proceeded with the adoption process was that her child’s  biological father – who is married and does not want to acknowledge her child – would have to give up all ties with her child. That would mean that in future, “he cannot turn around to claim against her,” Ms Tan said, referring to the Maintenance of Parents Act.
Ms Tan and her daughter, Lorraine (not her real name), now live with Ms Tan’s parents in her brother’s marital home.
Ms Tan said that once the adoption process is successful, she is planning to buy a built-to-order flat in her and her daughter’s names so as to guarantee that Lorraine’s future is secured, even when Ms Tan dies. “I have to protect my daughter’s interests,” she said.
In response to ST’s report, AWARE, Singapore’s leading gender equality advocacy group, said that it is “profoundly unconvincing to suggest that any meaningful values are promoted by making single mothers – already stressed and time-poor – jump through extra legal and administrative hoops to meet their children’s needs and strive for a better life”.

Ex-Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Calvin Cheng also mirrored AWARE’s sentiments on his Facebook post. He said,
“Here we have a story about a single, unwed mother who had to adopt her own biological child, so it gets legitimate rights. Ridiculous. Time to get rid of these archaic laws.”

 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Chee Soon Juan shares image of lamp post with exposed wires near a playground in Bukit Batok; Resident helps out with temporary fix

Dr Chee Soon Juan brought attention to the exposure of a lamp…

Thai judge out of ICU following suicide attempt in court; questions raised about judicial independence

After delivering a verdict of acquittal to five men facing trial on…

Khaw Boon Wan uses his recent injury as a cautionary tale for seniors in Singapore

Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan described fracturing his left arm was very…

德士司机拾“手机”不昧! 折返归还拒收费暖心乘客

尽管迎来新的一年我们仍面对各种挑战,生活中总还是会有些小小善举,为社会带来来希望。 据乘客何先生在上月31日,在脸书上发文感谢康福德高司机的暖心举动。 “我想要对一名曾为我服务的司机,公开说明我真诚的反馈。我希望您能阅读这篇文章,然后有关单位能够给予您回馈。” 何先生忆述在新年前夕,12月30日时在加龙威商场(Kallang Wave Mall)与朋友一同搭乘德士。当时手上已有一些袋子,尽管他与朋友都能够自行拿着,但司机仍愿意从车上下车提供协助,为他们提袋子。 然而,在抵达目的地后,俩人下车后,才发现其中一人的手机遗留在车上。他们立刻拨通康福德高的热线,却被搁置了约五分钟。 因此,他们决定回到公寓内,上网追踪手机的去处,再回拨给遗失的手机。 何先生表示,司机在手机拨通后的几分钟内就接听电话,并同意返回原途归还手机。据何先生表示,当时司机和他们的位置是有一些距离的。 “他比预期还早抵达,我们也向他跑过去,手上拿着50元。可是他只是将手机归还,拒绝我们的付款。” 何先生见状便与朋友提议为他支付一笔较低的款项。何先生也指出,一般司机在归还手机时,都会要求一笔费用支付他们的车费,且碍于位置的关系,很有可能是比此前搭乘的费用还高,仿佛是作为电话的赎金。 但司机却无意接受这笔款项,何先生也解释,当时也与司机一番劝说,最后他们才肯定司机只是单纯想归还遗失手机,这也让何先生备受感动。…