Source: Dr Chee Soon Juan article.

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Secretary-General Dr Chee Soon Juan questioned Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S Iswaran’s proposal to remake Orchard Road.
Dr Chee asked if Mr Iswaran remembered if Pedestrian Night at Orchard Road was not impactful on sales for retailers there.
“Has he forgotten Pedestrian Night where the entire Road was closed to traffic one Saturday night a month?” Dr Chee asked.
He stated that the party was discontinued because of thin crowds and retailers reported no impact on their earnings during the events.
“What makes Mr Iswaran think that doing the same on a permanent basis – to include daytime when it is hot – would be any different?” he noted. He needs to provide more hard data to show that his ideas will work before he spends more of the people’s hard-earned money.
He then stressed that the minister needs to provide more hard data to show that his ideas will work before he spends more of the people’s hard-earned money.
Here is what he wrote in full:

Singapore Democrats
Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S Iswaran says that the government will revamp Orchard Road to re-vitalise the shopping belt. One idea he has is to fully pedestrianise the area by closing off the Road to vehicular traffic.
This proposal comes in the midst of the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) embarking on a major project since 2004 to construct a series of elevated and underground links throughout Orchard Road.
These links, according to the government, are meant to provide shoppers a “seamless and all-weather comfort” in their retail experience. Stretching from The Forum near Anguilla Park to Orchard Central, the connecting links add up to nearly 30 km.
It, therefore, seems counter-intuitive for Mr Iswaran to now propose to close off Orchard Road and “fully pedestrianise” it. Do we want to drive shoppers underground to avoid the sun and rain or do we want them to stay at street level?
If we want more people to walk along Orchard Road instead of below it, why did we incur so much funds to build the underground links? The tunnels don’t come cheap, they cost taxpayers up to $28,700 per sq to construct.
Besides, the PAP has already spent $40 million to spruce up Orchard Road since 2002 including putting in landscape and infrastructural enhancements, state-of-the-art lighting, creative spaces and a partially closed off Orchard Road.
Back then (2002), the URA stated that there were “already well-used open spaces along Orchard Road where people meet or where events are organised”. Nevertheless, it said that new public spaces would be added and activities organized to keep Orchard Road “buzzing”. The project was completed in 2009.
Despite this, Orchard Road has become “kind of boring”; shopping centres are empty and shops shuttered.
Yet, Mr Iswaran now proposes to close off the entire Orchard Road. Has he forgotten Pedestrian Night where the entire Road was closed to traffic one Saturday night a month? The party was discontinued because of thin crowds and retailers reported no impact on their earnings during the events.
What makes Mr Iswaran think that doing the same on a permanent basis – to include daytime when it is hot – would be any different?
The Minister’s idea to create “a multi-purpose space” to introduce “experiential concepts” sounds suspiciously like what has been done before and failed.
Rather than use such fuzzy terms, he needs to provide more hard data to show that his ideas will work before he spends more of the people’s hard-earned money.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

反送中发起#metoo集会,三万人参与抗议港警性暴力行为

香港反送中已延续数月,警方在多次清场和局部行动中,屡次被指以性暴力镇压与羞辱示威者。当地妇女组织平等机会妇女联席昨晚(28日),在中环遮打花园发起“反送中#metoo集会”,抗议警方已性暴力手段镇压示威者。 集会于当天晚上8点开始,以紫色为主题。工作人员当天派发紫色丝带、紫色口罩,还是用紫色玻璃纸覆盖手机闪光灯,呈紫色光彩,并于红色唇膏在手臂上写 “#ProtestToo”,使现场充满一片紫光。 大会以紫色为主题颜色,不少參加者戴上紫色口罩,亦应呼吁用紅色唇膏在手臂上写上“#ProtestToo”,又用紫色玻璃纸盖着手机闪光灯,亮起一点点紫光。 据各大港媒报道,晚上7点左右,遮打花园内已有数百黑衣人聚集,集会开始前,已有不少示威者在现场高喊“五大诉求缺一不可”及“黑警环眼”。 集会期间,遮打花园檐蓬顶、昃臣道终审法院前空地、皇后像广场外遮打道一带全部挤满人,有嘉宾在分享时,市民不时愤慨高呼“黑警可耻”。 平等机会妇女联席发言人王秀容在集会上表示,在长达两个多月的示威运动期间,警方屡屡以武力镇压,同时也在执法期间对示威者或民众是以性暴力。 王秀容斥责警方的行为,是在滥用公权力,直指“假以执法之名,以性暴力作为威吓手段,企图透过肆意羞辱女性身体来吓止女性发声,强烈要求警务处严肃调查和处理示威运动期间的性暴力事件,以及滥权行为。 大会宣布,集会参与人数约三万人。 香港警方性暴力对待示威者事件频传,警方在拘捕过程中对女性毛手毛脚,例如警方在天水围拘捕行动中,将一名女示威者抬走时内裤脱落走光;还有传出在拘捕示威者期间,要求全裸搜索女示威者,同时有十几名男警员站在房外观看等,过分行径已遭各界挞伐。 对此,《香港01》报道,警方于28日在记者会上,针对警员的性暴力指控全面否认,称根据涉事女警填报的羁留搜查表格及记事册,受害者并没有被要求全裸搜身,并解释搜查只由与羁留人士的相同性别进行和监督,不会有异性在场,,但却拒绝透露搜身女警的级别。警方直指指控严重失实,并强调应让事件开启公平的调查,要受害者向警方作出投诉。 集会邀请示威运动遭性暴力对待受害者出席分享…

Economics and computing degree courses move up to top 5 earners

By Digital Senior As compared to the previous year, law, medical and…

Singapore transitioning to new benchmark rate for its S$3.5 trillion derivatives market

By the end of 2020, Singapore is looking to set up active…

Hannah’s Ordeal

Deborah Choo/ A typical day started at 5am. Hannah (not her real…