photo: singapore-sme.com

Singapore has been ranked 26th out of 155 countries in the 2017 World Happiness Report, falling four spots from its 2016 position.
According to the report, the country had also dropped in its overall happiness score by 0.068 points to 6.572.
However, it remains the happiest country across Asia based on the report’s rating.
The survey was published by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Solutions Network which stated that its analysis of the levels, changes, and determinants of happiness among and within nations continued to be based chiefly on individual life evaluations, roughly 1,000 per year in each of more than 150 countries.
The report gives special attention to the social foundations of happiness for individuals and nations. Chapter 2 of the report (“The Social Foundations of World Happiness”) starts with global and regional charts showing the distribution of answers, from roughly 3000 respondents in each of more than 150 countries, to a question asking them to evaluate their current lives on a ladder where 0 represents the worst possible life and ten the best possible.
report happiness
The scale was measured by answers to the Cantril ladder question, “Please imagine a ladder, with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. The top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?”
When the global population is split into ten geographic regions, the resulting distributions vary greatly in both shape and average values. Average levels of happiness also differ across regions and countries. A difference of four points in average life evaluations, on a scale that runs from 0 to 10, separates the ten happiest countries from the ten unhappiest countries.
Scandinavian countries take the top three spots, with Norway as the happiest country in the world, Denmark ranked second, and Iceland in third place.
Switzerland, Finland, and the Netherlands rank fourth, fifth, and eighth respectively, while Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Sweden round up the top ten.
In Asia, Thailand ranks 32nd, with Taiwan 33rd, Malaysia 42nd, and Japan 51st.
The United States is in 14th place, falling one spot from the previous year.
Professor Jeffrey Sachs, the director of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, told Reuters that Trump’s policies were all aimed at increasing inequality, including tax cuts at the top, throwing people off the healthcare rolls, and cutting Meals on Wheels in order to raise military spending.
“I think everything that has been proposed goes in the wrong direction,” he told the media.
He also added that happy countries are the ones that have a healthy balance of prosperity, as conventionally measured, and social capital, meaning a high degree of trust in a society, low inequality and confidence in government.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Amendment to dog licensing e-Services to allow licenses renewal up to 3 years

The Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) has announced that it…

Minister for Law: Article 35(4) does not create an age issue for the appointment of a 63-yr-old Attorney General

Minister for Law Mr K Shanmugam on behalf of the Prime Minister…

Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam receives international award for contributions to global financial governance

Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam was…

【舆论】杨莉明续任人力部长 其治下客工宿舍疫情、PMET议题惹诟病

我国7月25日宣布新届内阁名单,杨莉明续任人力部长一职,引起各界关注,因为她在处理客工宿舍疫情爆发一事,无法有效遏制疫情而遭诟病。 早在2月份时,就有客工确诊,包括实里达航空岭感染群;然而,如今新加坡的确诊人数持续攀升,杨莉明仍没有选择向公众道歉,并承认政府的疏失,而是拒绝道歉,因为她声称,要求当局道歉的客工,她一个也没遇上。 显然任何成年人给出这样的理由就已经令人震惊,更何况是身为部长,竟然给出这样的借口,简直让人难以相信。如今新加坡确诊人数持续攀升,但杨莉明仍然保住官位,请问公共责任在哪里? 撇开客工的问题不谈,人力部长杨莉明再次因专业人士、经理、执行员和技师(PMET)课题被抨击,即没有将外国PMET聘雇人数减少而引起争议。公平考量框架(Fair Consideration Framework)于2014年生效,以此增加新加坡人的劳动力,但外国PMET人数仍然未有锐减的现象。 人力部日前宣布47名雇主由于涉嫌出现歧视性聘雇的现象,已被列入公平考量框架的观察名单。 “我们会对招聘标准进行更严格的审查,以确保本地雇主不会出现国籍偏见,这是无法接受的,同时也符合公平、基于业绩的招聘。” 人力部还宣布将会针对240家涉嫌不遵守条规或可能预先聘雇外国人的公司进行调查。 这一切看似很好,但它显然已是存在许久的课题。事实上,已有在野党和其他媒体不断强调,而公平考量框架建立迄今已有六年之久,为何聘雇人数仍未锐减,是否缺乏其政治意愿? 虽然人力部如今不断强调会严格审查他们(外国人)的就业准证申请,让不合作或执意不改变的雇主削减他们的工作准证特权,但人力部正以何种评估标准对他们?难道就不应该设立一个客观和透明的标准,确保公平和问责性吗? 承上所述,无论是客工确诊病例持续递增或是外国PMET数量未有减少,均在杨莉明的监督下,但她的存在也似有若无,所以为何她仍然能够持续领导这部门?…