By Property Soul
Bloomberg just published an article on ‘Hong Kong Property Tax May Help End Singapore’s Housing Slump’ (Bloomberg, Jan 19).
The journalist cites the remarks of a Cushman & Wakefield spokesperson that foreign buyers may turn to Singapore after the 15 percent increase (30 percent in total) of stamp duty in Hong Kong. This can benefit Singapore to end the slide of property prices this year, especially when the Chinese are looking for a safe haven to park their weakening currency.
The herd of local business and property media, including Business Times, Singapore Business Review, Yahoo News, PropertyGuru, The Edge Property and Property Report, immediately picked up this piece of ‘good news’ without much thought and came up with similar headlines of ‘Singapore to benefit from Hong Kong tax hike’, ‘Hong Kong’s loss in overseas buyers may be Singapore’s gain’, etc.
propertysoul-bloomberg-HK-SG-curbsFor people who have a habit of comparing with others, they often make the mistake of benchmarking themselves against the wrong parties while overlooking the root of the problem.
Could anyone see that there are at least 4 fundamental faults in Cushman & Wakefield’s comments?
1. Foreigners are paying higher in terms of total stamp duties.
A foreigner buying a home in Singapore has to pay 15 percent Additional Buyer Stamp Duty on top of the existing Buyer Stamp Duty (usually under 3 percent depending on the value of the property).
However, there is a Seller Stamp Duty between 4 to 16 percent payable for the property sold within 4 years’ of purchase.
If the foreigner wants to dispose the property within a year, he is liable to a Seller Stamp Duty of 16 percent. In this whole buying and selling process, he has paid a total of close to 34 percent in stamp duties to the Singapore government.

2. There are plenty of choices in countries besides Singapore.

With aggressive marketing efforts of developers and agents targeting well-to-do overseas buyers, foreign property investors are spoiled for choices.
It is not only Singapore and Hong Kong which are seen as stable economy that helps to preserve capital. Places like New York, London, Vancouver and Sydney are also mature markets that promise stable returns in the long-term.
In the case of China, the government has constantly imposed property buying restrictions in major cities in China. With excessive liquidity and depreciating renminbi, Chinese property investment in global markets remains robust.
According to Juwai.com, an international property broker specialized in Chinese investors, for last year alone, the Chinese have dumped a total of US$80 billion in overseas properties.
The top 10 favorite countries for Chinese property investors are in the following sequence.

  1. USA
  2. Australia
  3. Canada
  4. New Zealand
  5. United Kingdom
  6. Thailand
  7. Spain
  8. Germany
  9. Japan
  10. France

Do you notice that Singapore and Hong Kong are not even in the top 10? How naive to believe that overseas property investment is a zero-sum game between two small countries.
Hong Kong developers revealed that around 20 percent of buyers in new projects are from mainland China. According to URA, the Chinese only bought 230 homes in Singapore (a drop from 243 deals a year ago) for the first nine months in 2016.

3. There are many investment options for the Chinese.

Using spare cash to buy properties is most popular for Singaporeans.
But our counterparts in China are far more creative.
Renminbi cannot be exchanged freely in China and there is risk of currency devaluation. There are many ways to transfer money out of the country, both legally and illegally. Let’s talk about only the legal options here.
When renminbi depreciated 6 percent against US dollars last year, the Chinese rushed to the greenback to shield them from the weakness of their local currency.
When the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect opened in Hong Kong last month, the mainland Chinese know that there is a new legal way to get money out of China.
When the Chinese rushed in droves to Hong Kong to buy insurance, new premium sales from the mainland Chinese hit HK$48.9 billion (S$9 billion) in just the first 9 months of 2016.
Hong Kong insurance agents reportedly swiped the credit cards of eager Chinese customers till midnight every weekend before they went back to China.
Unlike properties, these investment-linked insurance policies are bought in a currency pegged with the US dollar; with guaranteed return; no risk of price fluctuation; and can cash out any time.
Who cares about buying properties in Singapore?
With shortage of the Chinese currency in local banks, especially approaching Lunar New Year, the 6 to 12-month fixed deposit interest rate has just gone up to 6 percent per annum.
Facing a similar risk of declining in value, any Singapore investment property selling in this market able to offer 6 percent net return in the next 6 to 12 months?
4. Money from QE is not benefiting the real home buyers.
Thanks to QE (Quantitative Easing) for so much liquidity and hot money flowing around. Many people have no idea what to invest with their excessive cash and resort to following the crowd.
When the government of US, UK, Europe and Japan are printing money like nobody’s business, the banks find no better ways than lending more loans to large corporations.
But these big companies all know that the market is suffering from over-capacity with contracting consumer demand. There is no point to invest in improving productivity or cost-efficiencies.
The only way to spend that huge amount of cash is through endless acquisitions – through buying investment properties and acquiring profitable or unprofitable companies.
Both activities are not helping the economy: Acquiring properties at top prices further increases prices of the already overheated property market. Buying companies lead to unavoidable restructuring after the merge with more workers losing their jobs.
The actual end users of the residential properties are further priced out of the market. With high property prices and high unemployment rate, where can we find HDB upgraders and real home buyers to clear those 21,000 unsold units in Singapore?
Somebody’s pain is not necessarily your gain
Two months after the announcement of the increased stamp duty in Hong Kong, buyers continue to snap up new projects at record prices. Last Friday, 400 units at a project launch in Tsuen Wan priced at a record of over HK$20,000 per square foot were all sold out by the end of the day.
When was the last time we saw this in Singapore?
Foreigners may deter from buying Hong Kong properties with 30 percent stamp duty. Hong Kong property prices may face a correction. But that won’t benefit the Singapore housing market in any way.
For developers, agents, sellers and landlords, it’s time they went back to work harder on attracting buyers and tenants if they want to stop the continuous slump of the property market.
For fellow property buyers and investors, this is a perfect example why we need to read the news from the media with a pinch of salt, especially from industry stakeholders with vested interest.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lawyer in exile and former student union leader meets Malaysian Prime Minister along with other activists

Lawyer in exile and president of the University of Singapore’s Students’ Union…

What does the U.S. Federal Reserve’s coronavirus rate cut mean for you?

by ValueChampion In an effort to stem the economic and financial impacts of…

寄信问事石沉大海 功能八号揶揄内政部“不舍得请”接函职员

公民组织功能八号氏族会(Function 8),揶揄内政部尽管在公共关系投入5千900万的预算,却似乎连一位专司接收群众电邮的职员,都不舍得请。 该会透露,早在今年7月10日,他们透过电邮和普通邮件,致函内政部,询问有关数名在《内安法令》下,被逮捕和驱逐处境的缅甸人详情。 功能八号在信函中指出,该会关注任何涉及《内安法》的逮捕事件,也会提呈报告给联合国人权理事会普遍定期审议(Universal Periodic Review)。 为了确保数据准确,希望当局能透露被逮捕人数、年龄等详情。信件寄出后,当局既没有回函,也没有回复确认是否已收到信。 功能八号仍不厌其烦,在8月5日再次透过电邮和发帖文给内政部长尚穆根,而且还把信件副本邮寄给他。再一次,又是没有任何确认和回应。 “2019年8月27日,我们再次发函提醒部长,但是时至今日,还是没有任何回应。” 该会抱怨,部长和他旗下的公职人员的行为,仍有不足之处,也很遗憾该部不回应公民的信函,他们的反馈单位似乎不懂得设定自动确认信函是否已收到。 该会不忘指出,内政部作为服务新加坡市民的公家机构,2019年财政预算,在公共关系方面获得的拨款高达5千900万元,但讽刺的是却连专司接收信函的职员,也不舍得请。 “作为新加坡公民,我们要怎样让这些部长和公务员对我们负责?难道他们骂不得?难道与普通市民互动的简单举动,也已经超出了他们的职责,或有失他们身份?”