• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
  • zh-hans 简体中文
  • en English
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Surbana Jurong argues that dismissal of 54 staff without warning nor performance reviews, is not retrenchment exercise

by Terry Xu
21/01/2017
in Commentaries, Labour
Reading Time: 4min read
0

In a report by Straits Times on Thursday, it was revealed that an email was sent by Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine on Tuesday to address the recent dismissals by the company.
Surbana Jurong Private Limited or Surbana Jurong is a newly merged entity that is a combination of Surbana International Consultants and Jurong International Holdings in 2015 and is a wholly government owned company.
Surbana International Consultants was formerly the Building and Development Division in Singapore’s Housing and Development Board which was formed in 1960, which was then corporatised as HDBCorp in 2003 and acquired by Temasek Holdings in 2004.
CEO wrote poor performers cannot be allowed to affect the rest
In the email, he told the company employees that that the group cannot allow a small proportion of poor performers to be a drag on the rest of the organisation. That was why the infrastructure consultancy terminated the employment of a group of workers in Singapore over the past two weeks.
Mr Wong wrote in his email, “How can we be the best in class and build a great organisation when employees are not concerned with how they are performing relative to their peers?”.
“More importantly, for those of us who want to do great things, why should our rewards be affected by a small group of colleagues who don’t care about how their poor performance affects our performance negatively?”
“We cannot allow our 1 per cent of poor performers to continue to affect the rest of the 99 per cent of staff who are performing.”
Mr Wong in his e-mail said 54 employees were identified as poor performers – representing 0.41 per cent of Surbana Jurong’s global workforce and 0.79 per cent of its Singapore staff. They were from business units such as facility management, affordable housing, urban development, city management, infrastructure, urban planning and international headquarters.
Not a retrenchment exercise
Mr Wong added that there were no retrenchments nor was the exercise targeted at any specific business unit, community, discipline or age.
In his email, he noted that the group chairman Liew Mun Leong has spoken vehemently about poor company performance, which will drastically affect the bonuses of those business units that operated below par last year, despite efforts to grow the projects pipeline.
“(The chairman) stressed that managing this poor business performance is a responsibility for ALL of us, both managers and employees,” said Mr Wong.
Disguised retrenchment in name of dismissal of poor performers?
While Mr Wong classified the company’s dimissals as one to weed out the poor performers. But TOC understands that there had not been any performance appraisal performed for the dismissed employees before being threatened with the choice of being terminated or to resign voluntarily.
The 54 staff were told on different dates that they had a few days to think whether to be terminated by the company for alleged poor performance or to resign voluntarily by 6 January. Some were told as early as last December and some were told after coming back from a long leave in the first week of January.
Many were stunned by the company’s statement when it told the press that it had dismissed the staff for poor performance as they felt betrayed by the company for voiding the original reason of resignation so as not to affect their future job-seeking prospect.
Read: Laid off workers of Surbana Jurong given two letters to choose from, letter of termination and letter of resignation
The email by the CEO is not the first address by the company towards the dismissal of the employees, TOC understands from those who were dismissed that there had been a town hall meeting onJanuaryary as many left the company with their desks emptied without prior notification to their colleagues and had them wondering what has happened when they did not turn up for work the following Monday.
 
Unions and MOM investigating the matter
18 of the 54 dismissed workers are represented by Singapore Industrial and Services Employees’ Union and the Building Construction and Timber Industries Employees’ Union (Batu). Batu was quoted to have said that the unions are working with Surbana on how to help the affected union members and that it is still talking with the company.
TOC understands that the Minister of Manpower has called up all the employees who are non-union members on Friday (20 Jan) and is further looking into the matter.
Based on what the affected staff have said about the treatment to them, Surbana Jurong would seemed to have violated various employment regulations pertaining to retrenchment practices.
Will the union and MOM take action on the company that is owned by the government if it is proven that it disguised a retrenchment exercise and violated the rights of its staff? Will Singapore’s self-proclaimed functioning tripartite system really work hand in hand with the lax labour laws that are present in the city-state?

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • Facebook bans Myanmar military accounts citing the coup
  • PSP’s Hazel Poa call for more transparency on National Reserves so MPs can make informed decisions on a Budget
  • 137 NGOs from 31 countries ask UN for Myanmar arms embargo
  • S’pore receives first shipment of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine, but has yet to approve for use
  • Is it time to buy an electric motorcycle in Singapore?
  • How can the torture of a human being over 10 months take place under the watch of a police officer?

Trending posts

Female pastor apologises after netizens slammed her for asking women to dress less provocatively to stop men’s “lustful thoughts”

Desmond Lee highlights young couple received full $80K HDB grant; Grant means their combined salary is less than $1.5K

Kranji woodland saga: Former HDB deputy CEO says wrong to push responsibility to contractors

Graduates with fake degrees working in Singapore is an issue that goes back a long time

Can LTA and Minister Ong Ye Kung justify why was I summoned for riding my e-scooter on a walkway when every other riders are doing the same?

Myanmar protestors call for boycott of Singapore products, says S’pore shows lack of support to the people of Myanmar

Load More
January 2017
MTWTFSS
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 
« Dec   Feb »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply