Malaysian Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai urged Singapore to reconsider its decision to match the RM20 road charge that Malaysia imposed on 1 November last year.
Minister Liow told reporters after an event at Johor Bahru Tiong Hua Association that the countries have good ties. Therefore, he hopes that they Singapore will reconsider the decision.
He denied that Malaysia’s latest road charge discriminated against Singapore-registered cars, saying that the fee would be implemented at all border checkpoints in the country.
The New Straits Times quoted him as he said, “To say that there is discrimination against Singapore-registered cars is not true. We will eventually implement these charges on all foreign-registered cars entering via the Thai border, Kalimantan (Indonesian border) and the East Coast in the peninsula.”
“Singapore has been implementing its VEP (Vehicle Entry Permit) fee since 1973. But we (Malaysia) only implemented the road charge of RM20 last November,” he added.
Currently, Singapore imposes a S$35 VEP fee on foreign-registered cars entering the country. Each vehicle is given 10 free days a year and there are no charges during the weekends. Cars entering Singapore between 5pm and 2am from Monday to Friday are also exempt from VEP.
However earlier last week, Land transport Authority (LTA) announced that all foreign-registered cars will have to pay a Reciprocal Road Charge (RRC) of S$6.40 per-entry when they enter Singapore via the Tuas or Woodlands Checkpoint starting from 15 February 2017.
It noted that the RRC mirrors Malaysia’s Road Charge of RM20 per entry for non-Malaysia registered cars entering Johor, which was implemented on 1 November 2016.
LTA said that the RRC will be collected together with the Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP), toll charges and fixed Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) fees upon departure at the Tuas or Woodlands Checkpoint.
The Minister wrote, “The Government has a long-standing policy of matching any levy, tolls or fees charged by Malaysia for using the road links between Singapore and Malaysia to ensure that Malaysia takes into consideration our response whenever they raise their tolls or introduce a new levy.”
“The road charge is collected each time motorists enter Malaysia via Touch n’ Go cards at the two land entry points in Johor, the Causeway and the Second Link,” he added.
He also noted that Malaysia collected about RM13.9 million in road charges from Singapore vehicles between 1 November and 20 December last year.
More than 250,000 commuters from Malaysia travel into Singapore via Malaysian registered vehicles on a daily basis and it is unlikely that the road charge will deter them from crossing the causeway as a large majority of the commuters are working in Singapore while living in Malaysia.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police to return activist's note book after lawyer's demands

The Singapore Police has agreed to return the note book it had…

AGO had also found shortcomings in ministries and others: Png

“Over the years, the AGO has found sad instances of over payments,…

MND should stop misrepresenting AHPETC’s position

By Carlton Tan Late yesterday, March 14, the Ministry of National Development…

“藐视法庭”诉讼:高庭驳回拒绝盘问申请 限李绳武两周内上庭答辩

日前,总检察署近期申请撤销总理李显龙之侄子李绳武的辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分,“使之在审讯时不会被纳入考量”。对此,李绳武表示不会再继续参与。昨日(3日)高等法院驳回李绳武拒绝盘问的申请,下令李绳武需在14天内回答总检察署(AGC)所提出的提问。 李绳武去年9月提呈答辩宣誓书,并在法庭未将他的宣誓书采纳为呈堂证据前,就指示律师将宣誓书发布给媒体。总检察署日前已经为他的宣誓书申请进行盘问,并要求他在宣誓时回答相关问题,其中包括当他在发文时,其脸书上拥有多少好友,而该好友群体是否包括媒体从业人员,是否能够预见到帖文透过媒体发布出去。 对此,李绳武于上月表示已拒绝回答总检察署对其答辩宣誓书提出的问题,但其申请如今被高庭驳回,同时还下令出示其辩护宣誓书中提到的文件以及接受盘问。 与此同时,总检察署也向法庭申请指控李绳武与其律师在事前向媒体公开宣誓书,已违反了最高法院的程序。 总检察署昨日发文告表示,法庭目前已删除李绳武宣誓书中含诽谤性与无关紧要的内容,同时李绳武与律师也发宣誓书致歉。针对上述公开宣誓书一事,总检察署则已呈交相关李绳武与其律师违反法院程序的申请,仍待处理,各方在之后也必须再次上庭。 该诉讼起因于2017年7月15日,身为建国总理李光耀孙子、也是现任总理李显龙侄子的李绳武,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 在帖文发布后六天,国家资深律师FrancisNg指该帖文给了新加坡法律制度“令人震惊且毫无根据的攻击”,并要求李绳武签署一份声明,要求他承认虚假指控、藐视司法,并以此道歉。 但李绳武则认为他有促进新闻自由之责,有权批评政府,不料总检察署却选择加剧纷争,并为了“一段社交媒体的帖文”呈交数千页的法律文件。 李绳武也拒绝撤下有关贴文。他曾指出,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。…