SMRT Corporation fires train driver who was involved in the fatal accident on 22 March, that claimed the lives of two SMRT maintenance staff along the track at a servicing point near Pasir Ris station.

Straits Times has reported that the train driver, Mr Rahmat Mohd, 49, who had been assigned to a non-driving job after the accident was called to the SMRT office yesterday for an internal inquiry and discharged right away afterward.

Mr Rahmat is quoted to have said, “I feel sad, I have no plan at the moment.”

According to its sources, ST reported that a SMRT staff in the control center has also left as the result of the accident, preceding Mr Rahmat

In response to its queries, SMRT spokesman, Patrick Nathan, said the company does not give comment about staff disciplinary matters.

Meanwhile, Melvin Yong, executive secretary of the National Transport Workers Union and Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC said, “NTWU understands that SMRT has taken action to dismiss two workers related to the incident on March 22.”

“NTWU has previously written to SMRT to withhold any actions against the affected workers until completion of official investigations so as to not prejudice the outcome of the official investigations.”

“We will now review the situation, study the grounds for SMRT dismissal, and work with the affected staff on the next steps.” said Mr Yong.

Two SMRT maintenance workers were killed in an accident on 22 March this year after being hit by an oncoming train while they walked onto the tracks for their on-the-job training.

The two men were part of a group of 15 sent to investigate a possible fault with a track equipment.

Why was the train driver fired?

SMRT Trains Managing Director Lee Ling Wee had earlier said in a media interview that the train was driven by a train captain but was on auto mode and was travelling at 60km/hr.

An Accident Review Panel was subsequently formed and presented their findings in April. (read more)

In its findings, the panel pointed out that the vital safety protection measure of setting a code to ensure the speed limit on the affected track sector to 0 km/h so that no train can enter on automated mode was not applied. Neither was the deployment of watchmen to look out for approaching trains and provide early warning to the work team.

The panel noted that as the train was on automated mode when the accident happened, he was unable to prevent the accident despite having applied emergency brakes immediately when he saw the staff on the track.

It is uncertain why the train driver was fired given that the panel has not pinned any responsibility of the accident to the driver.

SMRT had earlier stated in a press statement that SMRT Trains has taken immediate steps to ensure stricter enforcement of procedures, strengthened system ownership and control across levels and work teams, and tightened supervision within teams to prevent a recurrence.

“We take responsibility and apologise for the tragic accident. We express our deepest condolences to the families of Nasrulhudin and Muhammad Asyraf in their time of grief,” and wrote that it is comprehensively reviewing all its safety structures, processes and compliance to ensure that safety continues to be accorded the highest attention and priority in its operations and maintenance services.

Given that the findings of the panel found systematic lapses of safety measures which resulted in the tragic accident, however after coming close to six months, SMRT has not shed light on why the lapses took place in the first place and who was involved in lapses to ensure that the safety measures were not enforced despite giving the go-ahead to go onto the tracks.

It is puzzling that SMRT has chosen to fire the train driver even before the senior management are being named, not to mention actions taken against them for the loss of two lives.

A coroner’s inquiry into the accident is expected to meet early next year.

A side note from  this incident shows how the endorsed unions like National Transport Workers Union is powerless to protect workers under its care. Tripartite working relation? Only if interest serves them well. 


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Health consultant criticises Gan for taking another 2 years to review Medishield Life claim limits

Four years ago in Jan 2015 when Health Minister Gan Kim Yong…

音乐会上晕倒后送院不治 著名钢琴家巫漪丽逝世

以一曲《梁祝》在优管(YouTube)上爆红的中国钢琴家巫漪丽,于4月20日,出席维多利亚音乐厅的音乐会时晕倒,紧急送院后宣告不治,享年89岁。 在音乐会下半场进行到一半时,巫漪丽忽然开始觉得背痛、冒冷汗,随后在新加坡音乐家协会副秘书唐翎的帮助下到洗手间去。岂知,她在上厕所途中晕倒了。救伤车在当晚约10时抵达音乐厅后,即刻对巫漪丽展开急救工作,之后再将她送到医院去,但是已经回天乏术了。 除了唐翎,新加坡音乐家协会会长傅春安和该协会的副秘书长贺争也赶到医院去,见巫漪丽的最后一面。傅春安表示巫漪丽的离去很突然,令人感到不舍,但是她也算善终,走得没有痛苦,而且当时很多音乐界的人士都陪伴在她的身旁。 据唐翎指出,巫漪丽曾于上周五与新中两位元老级声乐家陈毓申(86岁)和孙家馨(91岁)会面用餐,当时她并没有不妥。而事发当晚的音乐会,就是陈毓申(86岁)和孙家馨(91岁)的学生音乐会,由唐翎负责接送巫漪丽。 巫漪丽持有美国护照,已旅居新加坡26年了,孑然一身无子女,在新加坡只有一个表姐,但是她的表姐已经在一年多前去世了。而在中国北京,巫漪丽还有一名92岁的哥哥和87岁的妹妹。唐翎表示,“已经和巫老师的亲属联络上了。他们年纪大了,但是正设法办签证,希望能够尽快赶过来。” 一生奉献音乐 巫漪丽于1930年出生在中国上海一个知识分子的家庭中,是从钢琴大师李斯特的在传弟子、意大利著名音乐家梅百器。她18岁时就与上海交响乐团合作,演出贝多芬的《第一号钢琴协奏曲》。 她在1993年时,获得本地女高音苏燕卿的引介,首次来到新加坡,现在已经成为了新加坡的永久居民。 巫漪丽一生奉献音乐,就算年迈了还十分活跃于音乐界,经常担任演出嘉宾,而且不中断钢琴教学。她在音乐界的努力耕耘,甚至为他赢得了2017年在香港颁发的第五届“世界杰出华人艺术家大奖”。 她的突然离世,加上在本地无亲无故,本地音乐家协会主动负起她的丧礼。有关的丧礼已经决定在明天举行,周末出殡,但是为了寻获能容纳众多音乐界人士的较大场地,所以暂时场地未定。该协会也计划在丧礼期间,每天举办小型音乐会,作为巫漪丽最好的送别方式。 认识巫漪丽超过20年的傅春安表示,他非常尊重巫漪丽,并表示该协会能够为巫漪丽尽到最后的心音感到很安慰。他甚至表示,如果丧礼资金不足,他也会自掏腰包支付所有余款。 热爱音乐支持行善…

SIA confirms 16 of its Singapore-based staff have tested positive for COVID-19

National carrier Singapore Airlines (SIA) has revealed that 16 of its local-based…

Police investigate Singapore Sports Hub partner

Kannan Raj Consistel, a partner of the Singapore Sports Hub is under…