TODAY, 28 August 2015
TODAY, 28 August 2015
TODAY, 28 August 2015

Suggestions that politicians can work without incentives is a seductive notion, especially during an election period, says the Minister of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR), Vivian Balakrishnan.

The minister was speaking at a National Day Rally public forum organised by the government’s feedback outfit, REACH.

A participant had questioned the honorarium which Members of Parliament (MP) receive – which is S$16,000 a month, or $192,500 annually.

If an MP sat for the full parliamentary term of five years, he would have been paid almost a million dollars – S$962,000.

Ministers receive salaries which run into the millions.

In his response to the question raised at the forum, Dr Vivian said there are only two kinds of people who would work without incentives – those who are wealthy, and those who are corrupt.

“Don’t be seduced,” he was quoted by the TODAY newspaper as having said. “The danger with elections is it’s an auction. Everybody would promise you the moon. Everybody would say they don’t need pay on the assumption either they don’t need to deliver, or things will go wrong.”

The amount of honorarium being paid to MPs and the salaries received by ministers have been hot topics for many years, particularly for MPs whom some see as just a part-time job, given that MPs themselves have their own private careers.

But REACH chairman, Amy Khor, said that being in the industry would help her to contribute more.

“You have to look at it more broadly,” said Dr Khor, who is also Senior Minister of State for Manpower and Health. “Is the MP contributing as you expect? In fact, if I can do that, and I still can add value because I have a better understanding of what’s going on outside in the real world. Isn’t that giving you more value?”

In recent weeks, after an online website published a list of the number of times each MP has spoken in the last parliament (2011 – 2015), some were shocked to learn that some MPs had spoken up in the House for only a handful of times in those four years, and questioned the amount of taxpayers’ money paid to these MPs.

These included former ministers such as Mah Bow Tan and Wong Kan Seng.

It was also reported that the former Transport Minister, Raymond Lim, had not made a single parliamentary speech since being replaced as Transport Minister in 2011.

Mr Lim has since announced that he will be retiring from politics at the upcoming elections.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马前大使:马政权换人当家,新加坡应调整外交策略

针对新马边界争议闹得沸沸扬扬,一名马国前大使呼吁,新加坡最好习惯,在马国政权更迭后,入主布城的希盟政府不同于以往的纳吉政权,会更为优先马国的利益。 这名前大使也分析,近期新马双边浮现争议,例如新加坡扩大大士一带海域界限,很大程度上也和新加坡领导层更迭有关。 这名不愿具名的前大使,是接受马国网媒《今日自由大马》采访,指出也许新加坡还沉浸在过去与马国交流沟通的模式。 “因一马公司丑闻缠身,纳吉政府比较感兴趣在稳固政权的前提下,才与新加坡合作。” 他也认为,新加坡“不必要的挑衅行为”,企图动摇希盟政府的稳定。 但前大使也提醒,马国有权质疑外国任何直接侵犯主权的决策。他呼吁新加坡,最好去习惯现在的布城政府会优先捍卫马来西亚的利益。 “如果要和邻国交好,新加坡应低调处理这些悬而未决的课题,而不是把所有分歧都公开谩骂。” 马释放善意,放弃上诉白礁主权 前大使也指出,希盟政府入主布城后,为了表达善意,也没有再透过海牙国际法庭,上诉白礁岛主权,让此争议平息。遗憾的是,新加坡还是要继续对马国采取对抗态度。 另一方面,新加坡外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里,早前在个人脸书表示,马国政权更迭后,许多旧课题重新浮上台面,他认为,马国政治存在不确定因素,不可避免地把新加坡妖魔化,来维持内部凝聚力。 至于马国内部对于新马海域纠纷,朝野也出现意见分歧。早前马国执政党土著团结党最高理事莱斯胡先曾警告,新马争议若双方态度强硬对双方没好处,会“承受千刀凌迟的痛苦”。 不过,另一方面,马国反对党马华总会长、前首相署部长魏家祥,则不同意马哈迪的说法,指责敦马“不应在政府受威胁时就向华人或“邻国”开刀,因为这并非解决问题之道。”…

徐顺全再向穆仁理挑起“兼职议员论”

组屋消防栓被锁,要救火时水管喷不出水,对此民防部队在本月8日,向裕廊-金文泰市镇理事会,发出“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice)。 至于武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理,于本月15日在脸书公开致歉,指作为民选代议士,“政治上需对居民负责”( politically accountable)。“这些事件不该发生,我必须道歉。我将与我的民选与受委市镇会同仁检讨此事,并保障加强消防安全系统的可靠。” 尽管民主党秘书长徐顺全也赞扬穆仁理肯担当致歉,不过他也进一步致函负责裕廊-金文泰市镇会,包括尚达曼和穆仁理等七位国会议员,呼吁他们担起火灾灾黎的医疗费用。 与此同时,他不忘挑起在2016年武吉巴督补选,曾引起选民热议的“全职议员之争”。 徐曾指要当全职议员不聘代理 回溯2016年,徐顺全和穆仁理一同角逐武吉巴督国会议席。那个时候,徐顺全强调自己若当选将担任全职议员,并重申将亲自管理市镇理事会,不会雇用管理代理来加重成本。他也重申,将成立四人团队来负责市镇会交接事宜。 徐顺全的呼声似乎对选民颇有吸引力。为了反制徐的舆论,包括行动党重量级领袖前副总理尚达曼、文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕、前国会议长哈莉玛等,一同为穆仁理站台。 当时哈莉玛呼吁选民不要被徐顺全的“全职议员论”所蒙骗,指“关键是与民众在一起时做出多少贡献”。…

Singapore Justice in the Dock Indeed

The following is an excerpt of an article published in Asia Sentinel.…