The Telegraph, Nov 2014
The Telegraph, Nov 2014
The Telegraph, Nov 2014

“Pampered, mediocre, expensive, timid”?

That was how the Government-controlled local press once asked of the professionals, managers, executives and technicians – or PMETs.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, however, seems to now admit that the problems faced by this group of Singaporeans are in fact real.

After insisting for years that “foreigners do not take jobs away from locals”, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has now tacitly admitted that perhaps they do, and this has affected the PMETs in particular.

The government’s position on foreign workers or foreign talents, however, was not always so.

“I hope Singaporeans will look at the contributions of foreign workers objectively – they are not here to steal our jobs, but to help us enlarge the economic pie,” Mr Lee said in his May Day Rally speech in 2008.

Now, he says such competition between locals and foreigners present him with a “problem”.

“[When] a PMET comes to compete with a PMET, I have a political problem,” Mr Lee said in an interview with Ambassador-at-Large Professor Chan Heng Chee on Sunday.


Prof Chan had asked Mr Lee how the government would address the concerns of PMETs “who worry that foreigners are prepared to come in to work for less pay and they are marginalised.”

“So, how do you stop PMETS from being passed over and lose out as a result?” she asked.

Mr Lee replied that the situation has changed somewhat from earlier days when “the PMETs were a very small portion of the population.”

“And so if you are a PMET, you are at the top 10 per cent,” he said. “You are presumed to know to how to look after yourself and the numbers are not big, but now PMETs are maybe half the workforce.”

Now, however, Mr Lee says the government “can’t quite take a let-things-be approach” anymore.

“I think that we have to make sure that the PMETs get a fair opportunity, that they fairly treated and that we are not overwhelmed by an inflow which is squeezing our own people,” he said, apparently admitting that the influx of cheaper foreigners is a danger to locals losing their jobs.

Mr Lee cited the government schemes which have been introduced to help PMETs.

Nonetheless, Mr Lee said that “there will always be frictions when you have a foreign worker population or immigrant population in the country” and that the government would have to “manage that”.

Mr Lee’s remarks in the interview is a somewhat different take on the issue of foreign workers or foreign talent.

In his May Day Rally speech in 2008, Mr Lee had insisted that “foreigners do not take jobs away from locals”, amidst complaints that Singaporeans were being passed over in jobs by employers who preferred foreigners.

And in 2011, Mr Lee was again adamant that “foreigners create good jobs for Singaporeans”.

Straits Times
Straits Times

In a 2011 Yahoo report, Mr Lee was reported thus, when defending the government’s open-door policy on foreigners:

“PM Lee cited statistics to rebut the notion that foreigners are competing with Singaporeans for jobs. He said that of the 1,200 workers at IM Flash Singapore, six in 10 employees are Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs), and four in 10 are foreigners.

“Furthermore, two-thirds of the managerial and professional positions are taken up by Singaporeans and PRs, while two-thirds of the technician and manufacturing jobs are done by foreigners.

“Without the foreign workers, we would not have attracted this US$3 billion investment, and Intel and Micron would have built its wafer fab elsewhere,” said PM Lee.

“But by allowing in a controlled number of foreign workers, far from disadvantaging Singaporean workers, we have created more good jobs for Singaporeans. For every one foreign worker, we have created 1.5 local jobs in this project,” he added.

Indeed, Mr Lee’s position seems to waver from time to time, one moment telling Singaporeans that they should not be paranoid about the future, and in the next, saying that they should in fact be paranoid.

“I think that is what Singapore needs to do – to be aware, to be paranoid so you always know that somebody can take your lunch away,” he said last year, 2014.

But in 2015, in an interview with the Financial Times, when Mr Lee was asked  “if Singaporeans still need to feel insecure” about their future, his response was:

“You don’t have to be paranoid but you do have to take risks very seriously.”

While the results of government support schemes are yet to be seen – whether they will indeed give locals a fair opportunity when it comes to jobs and wages – what is also disconcerting is how young these Singaporeans are who are finding it hard to find jobs and need help from the government.

A recent Ministry of Manpower (MOM) report showed “that close to three in four workers retrenched in the first quarter of this year were professionals, managers, executives and technicians, compared with one in two last year,” the TODAY newspaper reported.

“Over half did not find new jobs within six months.”

Workers aged 40 and above took a longer time to find jobs, compared to younger ones.

Older PMETs have got it worse, and needing more support in finding jobs after being retrenched.


This was why Career Activation Programme — a tie-up between the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and local social enterprise GioCareers – was recently introduced to provide support for older unemployed PMETs.

“Hopefully somebody ‘up there’ reads this and improves the predicament of many like myself,” said Mr Long, 58, in a recent Straits Times report.

Mr Long used to work as a general manager in the oil and gas industry, drawing some $15,000 a month.

Now, it takes him eight months to make that much – Mr Long now works as a taxi driver after having lost his job, and after having spent six years looking for another one.

“I’m not asking to become a GM again, I just want to be somewhere I can contribute with my experience,” he said.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《亚洲周刊》刊专题 质问何时恢复陈六使公民权

1963年9月23日,东南亚第一所华文大学南洋大学的创校人陈六使,被指控“与共产党份子合作”,被剥夺公民权。直到1972年老人家离逝,都未能获平反。 今年第48期(2020/11/30-12/6)的《亚洲周刊》刊载封面专题–《南洋大学等待平反   创办人陈六使公民权何时恢复?》,重访当年轰轰烈烈的教育抗争路,亦无疑向当今新加坡执政领袖抛出问题,如何重新看待南大课题。 2019年10月,南洋理工大学把校园内原名南洋谷的道路,易名“陈六使径”,肯定陈六使对教育的贡献。时任教育部长王乙康还主持揭牌仪式。“陈六使径”的设立也引发联想,许多校友和东南亚华人,都希望南大和陈六使获得平反。 “然而官方对此举完全不谈陈六使名誉是否恢复的问题,还有一些人议论的是,以陈六使对南大与华社的贡献之巨与气魄之大,路名却仅仅是一个微不足道的‘Walk’,既不匹配也显得小器。” 1953年,陈六使倡议创办以华文为主的大学,并率先捐出五百万新元。登高一呼,立马获得华人社会响应,“新马各界泉涌而来的捐献,涓滴成河海,尤其是新加坡本地,除了商家,无数市井小民、三轮车夫、舞女、小贩、洗衣妇,都为了一所完全属于民间的华文大学,默默献出自己的劳力和血汗,换成微不足道的捐款。” 《亚洲周刊》的文章提及,后来陈六使与英殖民者及已故李光耀的矛盾被政治化、甚至被视为眼中钉,结果被扣上“曾经积极与反国家共党分子合作”、对“南大在治安上成为马来亚之严重问题应负其责”为由,剥夺了陈六使的公民权。 南洋大学在一1956年正式开课,到1980年举行第21届毕业典礼为止,共培养毕业生约1万2千人,校友包括新加坡执政党政治人物蔡崇语、何家良、庄日坤、柯新治、陈原生、流亡政治人物谢太宝、何元泰、邓亮洪、反对派政治人物刘程强、艺术家陈瑞献、著名作家尤今、资深媒体人林任君、杜南发、潘正镭、澳洲历史学者杨进发、大马前内阁部长刘贤镇、企业家与社团领袖林源德、颜清文、历史学者李业霖、资深媒体人谢诗坚、评论人李万千、香港学者郑赤琰、财经专家曾渊沧、印尼出生的学者廖建裕等,都是南大校友。南大毕业生不像以英文为主流的新加坡大学毕业生,容易进入公务员体系或与官方相关的大企业,很多人在私人企业界闯荡或出洋深造,不少人成就斐然。 当年办校盛况今竟不复记忆 1958年3月30日南大落成典礼更是空前盛况,“前往校园的一条裕廊路塞车长达16公里,出席主宾总督顾德爵士,都为此迟到两个多小时”。 然而文章也感叹,短短两代人对当年那个缔造离逝的盛况,竟然不复记忆,甚至不愿提起。 其中一个原因,是李光耀在世前后的执政者,都不愿去面对它,在野党领袖也不敢、不便或不屑去提起它。李光耀在回忆录里试图隐晦自己在南大关闭事件中的角色,将倡导关闭南大的责任,归属于南大毕业的几名内阁成员。…

藐视法庭罪成被罚款1.5万元 李绳武讽“三个字花了三年审讯”

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。 至于高庭法官加南拉美斯今早(29日)裁决,李绳武藐视法庭罪名成立,判罚款1万5000元,或一周监禁。 加南拉美斯称,李绳武的脸书贴文,明显在抨击我国司法制度,按常理应预料到这些贴文会被人转载、引起媒体兴趣。 李绳武今早未出庭。早前李绳武已表示不会再继续参与诉讼。至于政府律师强调法庭与总检察署已告知他聆讯日期。 尽管早前李绳武已说明,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。 而政府律师早前指责,李绳武没在贴文里要求脸书朋友不要转发、也不肯揭露自己的脸书朋友圈有多少人,“似乎有隐瞒”;政府律师也指李沉浸于李光耀孙子光环,接受外媒采访,却诋毁祖父守护的司法制度。 李绳武分享爷爷的回忆录 获悉高庭今早的裁决,李绳武也发了一则贴文,分享自己日前整理书架,找到爷爷李光耀多年前赠予他的著作《李光耀回忆录——从第三世界到第一世界:1965到2000》。 “在我大伯欺负弟妹、家庭破裂前,那是较美好的时光”。他表示不同意法庭的判决,也担心这会助长人民行动党打压政治众论的倾向。 “政府浪费了公务员三年的时间,来回应我私人贴文里的三个字。”…

生前无任何健康问题 美国出现首宗未成年死亡病例

美国出现首宗未满18岁武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)患者病逝,死者是一名少年。 据洛杉矶卫生部官员指出,未满18岁的死者来自该省北部的兰卡斯特市,生前没有其他疾病或健康问题。 当局表示,包括该名未成年病患在内,洛杉矶至今已出现了11起死亡案例,确证病例多达662起。 洛杉矶市长埃里克·加塞蒂(Eric Garcetti)指出,一名身体健康的少年死于此病,给当地少年一个警醒。“要知道你的行为能够挽救生命,也可以致命,而那条命是你自己的。” 而在这之前,全球只出现了两起未成年人死亡病例,包括一名患者是生前患有肠道疾病的婴儿,且都来自中国。 多项研究显示冠毒严重威胁了年长者以及患有基础疾病的患者,而出现年幼患者,或感染后出现严重病况的几率较低。 美国或成冠毒流行全球中心 据《路透社》指出,世界卫生组织(WHO)周二(24日)曾表示,美国可能成为冠毒大流行的全球中心,这也迫使日本东京2020年夏季奥运会推迟。 试图遏止疫情,英国也加入封国行列,而数据显示,澳大利亚、日本和西欧的商业活动会以创纪录的速度崩溃,美国也呈现堪忧状态。 据悉,截止目前为止,全球194个国家和地区的确证病例已经超过了40万,累计死亡病例也超过1万8千宗。 世卫组织女发言人玛格丽特·哈里斯(Margaret…

Judge hands out deterrent sentence to Amos Yee’s assailant

Neo Gim Huah, the man who slapped teenage blogger Amos Yee outside…