(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

By Howard Lee

The ruling People’s Action Party would indeed be naive if it were to believe that the issue that drew a massive bone of contention following the last general election would be quietly forgotten.

No, we are not talking about the Prime Minister suing Roy Ngerng or the arrest of Amos Yee, raucous a these were. The 6.9 million target for the Population White Paper is still very much with us, in spite of the many moons that have passed since it was first mooted in February 2013. Has the government’s position changed since then, when it decided to couch it as a “planning tool” rather than a “projection target”?

Without doubt, this single proposal that drew the largest organic turnout at Speakers’ Corner left a smarting wound in the PAP’s side, to which no opposition party had, wisely, even bothered to offer sympathies. Faced with public transport congestion, competition for jobs and the squeeze in leisure spaces, Singaporeans have openly made their displeasure known.

Where does the government currently stand on the population influx issue? Judging from a recent quote by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, where he compared Singapore’s population woes with China’s, not much has really changed:

“So, we slow down the foreign intake — we have corrected the policy. But we need to let people know more about our dilemma, that we have this responsibility as the country’s leaders,” he said. “This is a hot potato for the Singapore Government, but we’re the leaders, and we hope people will accept that we have good intentions.”

The wound still smarts, if it takes the PM to make at attempt at justifying it, particularly so close to the next general elections. But it seems to have gotten back to an issue of “letting people know”, or as it was famously put after GE2011, a “communication problem”.

workProductivity as (conditional) lever

The government has clearly taken note of the displeasure from the ground, but it remains to be seen if there were any real significant changes to manage the population issue.

The moderation of foreign worker numbers was first mooted in 2014. However, there are reasons to believe that the actual numbers have not really gone down. In addition, we need to remember that this is a temporary freeze, and while the former Manpower Minister has indicated that there would be no u-turn to more stringent foreign manpower curbs, he was also mindful to “provide flexibility in industries such as healthcare and landscaping, where there is an essential economic or social need.”

In addition, “sector-specific needs have already been catered for through the different Dependency Ratio Ceilings for the five sectors – Services, Manufacturing, Construction, Marine and Process.” Other solutions for raising productivity seems to revolve around throwing more money into the sectors in question, such as S$450 million over three years for the construction industry to adopt more technology to reduce manpower reliance.

The success of such measures remain to be seen, but meanwhile, the threat of a return to earlier foreign labour grown currently hangs over us with one benchmark – productivity. Whereas the White Paper had earlier suggested that foreign workers are needed to make up for our slow population growth – as if babies can be put to work to support our economy – the new mantra is now to focus on Singaporeans’ contribution to economic growth.

Essentially, would a further drop in productivity signal the government to salvage faltering GDP figures by returning to unrestrained foreign labour growth?

(Image - gov.sg YouTube channel)
(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

Cultural persuasion

Beyond this supposed management of foreign manpower, efforts have also been made to inculcate a greater acceptance towards a growing population of foreigners or “new citizens”. The

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the government creating an entire series of videos to encourage Singaporeans to “Think About It” and hopefully bring a different perspective on why foreign workers are important to Singapore society and our economy.

The series consists of mini “dramas” that depict Singaporeans presumably xenophobic attitudes countered by a more restrained logical evaluation. There are also forums held with media personalities, community leaders and politicians to debate the issue.

Comments to the video series had been disabled, so there is no way to ascertain public response to them. Nevertheless, there is a good chance that they have been produced by the government, as they are all hosted on gov.sg’s YouTube channel. We might not ever know the amount of tax-payers’ money specifically spent on the series, but what is clear is that they are in line with the PM’s hope that “people will accept that the government has good intentions” in proposing population augmentation.

Also read “The 6.9 million issue – Part 2: Still short-sighted?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam: PM Lee Hsien Loong should not weaponise S’pore’s defamation laws to shut down questions on govt ‘knowledge of 1MDB’

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his government should not weaponise Singapore’s…

SBS Transit CEO who resigns over “personal indiscretion” earns $1.2 million last year

It was reported that SBS Transit CEO Gan Juay Kiat who has…

雇年长员工、调高退休年龄 企业可获最高25万元津贴

企業调高退休和重新雇佣年龄,或聘雇兼职年长员工,可获得高达12万至25万元的津贴。 人力部长杨莉明在国会辩论部门开支预算时表示,年长员工向当局反馈,若接近退休年龄时,希望能够减少工作量,或被公司重新雇佣为兼职,会更愿意留在职场上。 但仍有雇主对此反应,一些业务安排为兼职可能会面临挑战,因此,当局也推出兼职重新雇佣津贴(Part-Time Re-employment Grant ),即企业若重新雇佣年长员工,将可获得高达12万5千元的津贴。 此外,若企业再2022年7月前,预先调高退休和重新雇佣年龄,亦将可获得高达25万元(Senior Worker Early Adopter Grant)的津贴。 另一方面,当局也将在未来三年,以年长员工补贴配套 (Senior…

越南如何保持“零死亡”记录? 专家称诚实、迅速防控疫情蔓延

在疫情肆虐全球之际,各国都忙于压平疫情曲线(flatten the curve),甚至要保持“零死亡”更是难上加难。然而,越南却“奇迹般”做到了。目前仍保持在不到300确诊病例,并尚无死亡病例。到底越南在防疫控制中做了什么,让它们可以持续保持“零死亡”的记录。 《澳洲广播公司新闻频道》(ABC news)于本月13日发表相关文章揭露越南在冠状病毒19的防控工作。文章指出,如今越南的确诊病例仅达249例,尚无死亡病例,与其他东南亚国家包括马来西亚和新加坡比较起来,显得出类拔萃,更是许多国家望尘莫及的防控结果。 维多利亚州墨尔本伯内特(Burnet)医学研究院教授迈克图尔(Mike Toole)向澳洲广播公司新闻频道表示,“澳洲确实相当关注新加坡的情况,但新加坡目前是世界最大的败笔之一。” 越南“零死亡”秘诀:当局诚实让人们能够获得具体充足的信息 而这均归功于越南当局对冠状病毒的诚实,让越南人民获得具体充足的有关疫情及其防控措施的信息。 文章也援引维多利亚州墨尔本伯内特(Burnet)医学研究院教授迈克图尔(Mike Toole)的话,“从1月初开始,政府便意识到国内临床资源有限,稍有疏失,越南可能将无法控制疫情的爆发。因此他们并没有将病毒包装成普通流感,而是描述了症状,并提供他们检测讯息。” 尽管越南是一党专制国家,在信息透露上是出了名的严谨,但在防疫工作上,大部分专家仍倾向相信越南政府所公开的数据皆为真实。…