(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

By Howard Lee

The ruling People’s Action Party would indeed be naive if it were to believe that the issue that drew a massive bone of contention following the last general election would be quietly forgotten.

No, we are not talking about the Prime Minister suing Roy Ngerng or the arrest of Amos Yee, raucous a these were. The 6.9 million target for the Population White Paper is still very much with us, in spite of the many moons that have passed since it was first mooted in February 2013. Has the government’s position changed since then, when it decided to couch it as a “planning tool” rather than a “projection target”?

Without doubt, this single proposal that drew the largest organic turnout at Speakers’ Corner left a smarting wound in the PAP’s side, to which no opposition party had, wisely, even bothered to offer sympathies. Faced with public transport congestion, competition for jobs and the squeeze in leisure spaces, Singaporeans have openly made their displeasure known.

Where does the government currently stand on the population influx issue? Judging from a recent quote by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, where he compared Singapore’s population woes with China’s, not much has really changed:

“So, we slow down the foreign intake — we have corrected the policy. But we need to let people know more about our dilemma, that we have this responsibility as the country’s leaders,” he said. “This is a hot potato for the Singapore Government, but we’re the leaders, and we hope people will accept that we have good intentions.”

The wound still smarts, if it takes the PM to make at attempt at justifying it, particularly so close to the next general elections. But it seems to have gotten back to an issue of “letting people know”, or as it was famously put after GE2011, a “communication problem”.

workProductivity as (conditional) lever

The government has clearly taken note of the displeasure from the ground, but it remains to be seen if there were any real significant changes to manage the population issue.

The moderation of foreign worker numbers was first mooted in 2014. However, there are reasons to believe that the actual numbers have not really gone down. In addition, we need to remember that this is a temporary freeze, and while the former Manpower Minister has indicated that there would be no u-turn to more stringent foreign manpower curbs, he was also mindful to “provide flexibility in industries such as healthcare and landscaping, where there is an essential economic or social need.”

In addition, “sector-specific needs have already been catered for through the different Dependency Ratio Ceilings for the five sectors – Services, Manufacturing, Construction, Marine and Process.” Other solutions for raising productivity seems to revolve around throwing more money into the sectors in question, such as S$450 million over three years for the construction industry to adopt more technology to reduce manpower reliance.

The success of such measures remain to be seen, but meanwhile, the threat of a return to earlier foreign labour grown currently hangs over us with one benchmark – productivity. Whereas the White Paper had earlier suggested that foreign workers are needed to make up for our slow population growth – as if babies can be put to work to support our economy – the new mantra is now to focus on Singaporeans’ contribution to economic growth.

Essentially, would a further drop in productivity signal the government to salvage faltering GDP figures by returning to unrestrained foreign labour growth?

(Image - gov.sg YouTube channel)
(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

Cultural persuasion

Beyond this supposed management of foreign manpower, efforts have also been made to inculcate a greater acceptance towards a growing population of foreigners or “new citizens”. The

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the government creating an entire series of videos to encourage Singaporeans to “Think About It” and hopefully bring a different perspective on why foreign workers are important to Singapore society and our economy.

The series consists of mini “dramas” that depict Singaporeans presumably xenophobic attitudes countered by a more restrained logical evaluation. There are also forums held with media personalities, community leaders and politicians to debate the issue.

Comments to the video series had been disabled, so there is no way to ascertain public response to them. Nevertheless, there is a good chance that they have been produced by the government, as they are all hosted on gov.sg’s YouTube channel. We might not ever know the amount of tax-payers’ money specifically spent on the series, but what is clear is that they are in line with the PM’s hope that “people will accept that the government has good intentions” in proposing population augmentation.

Also read “The 6.9 million issue – Part 2: Still short-sighted?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Josephine Teo: Four breakdowns per lift per year

Member of Parliament for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, Josephine Teo, responded to queries about…

Netizens cite poor remuneration package as reason behind why people are not applying for 1,000 F&B jobs

Despite the availability of nearly 1,000 vacancies in the food and business…

终生健保4月起扩大范围 资援妊娠并发症患者

终身健保计划将从今年4月1日开始,将为患有妊娠并发症的女性提供部分经济支持,而有妊娠糖尿病史的女性,也将更容易获得早期筛查。 从现有的住院病患索赔限额开始,终身健保计划覆盖范围将扩展至24种严重妊娠和分娩并发症,包括子痫和产后出血的住院治疗。 卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉指出,有关的变动将在一年内让4000名病患受惠。他是在3月6日国会拨款委员会辩论部门预算开支时,如是说到。 定期体检提供筛查津贴 自6月开始,该部门将依据“定期体检,益您一生”(Screen for Life)计划,为患有妊娠期糖尿病史的妇女进行津贴筛查。妊娠期糖尿病是妇女在怀孕期间才会出现的糖尿病情况,而会出现类似情况的孕妇,更容易患上2型糖尿病。 卫生部高级政务部长许连碹(Amy Khor)博士则提到,在定期体检计划下,他们将自动获得心血管风险筛查津贴,而且无需再采用线上糖尿病风险评估工具以获取资格了。 她是在回应麦波申选区议员陈佩玲的提问时,如此说到。陈佩玲询问在预防性健康领域,政府为女性提供了什么支援,毕竟女性的寿命更长。 荷兰-武吉知马集选区的迪舒沙也提出了有关财务支援的问题。 列出妊娠期并发症清单…

Dengue cases decline, majority dengue clusters not considered hotspots anymore, says Masagos Zulkifli

After dengue cases hit a 5-year high in July with 665 cases…