(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

By Howard Lee

The ruling People’s Action Party would indeed be naive if it were to believe that the issue that drew a massive bone of contention following the last general election would be quietly forgotten.

No, we are not talking about the Prime Minister suing Roy Ngerng or the arrest of Amos Yee, raucous a these were. The 6.9 million target for the Population White Paper is still very much with us, in spite of the many moons that have passed since it was first mooted in February 2013. Has the government’s position changed since then, when it decided to couch it as a “planning tool” rather than a “projection target”?

Without doubt, this single proposal that drew the largest organic turnout at Speakers’ Corner left a smarting wound in the PAP’s side, to which no opposition party had, wisely, even bothered to offer sympathies. Faced with public transport congestion, competition for jobs and the squeeze in leisure spaces, Singaporeans have openly made their displeasure known.

Where does the government currently stand on the population influx issue? Judging from a recent quote by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, where he compared Singapore’s population woes with China’s, not much has really changed:

“So, we slow down the foreign intake — we have corrected the policy. But we need to let people know more about our dilemma, that we have this responsibility as the country’s leaders,” he said. “This is a hot potato for the Singapore Government, but we’re the leaders, and we hope people will accept that we have good intentions.”

The wound still smarts, if it takes the PM to make at attempt at justifying it, particularly so close to the next general elections. But it seems to have gotten back to an issue of “letting people know”, or as it was famously put after GE2011, a “communication problem”.

workProductivity as (conditional) lever

The government has clearly taken note of the displeasure from the ground, but it remains to be seen if there were any real significant changes to manage the population issue.

The moderation of foreign worker numbers was first mooted in 2014. However, there are reasons to believe that the actual numbers have not really gone down. In addition, we need to remember that this is a temporary freeze, and while the former Manpower Minister has indicated that there would be no u-turn to more stringent foreign manpower curbs, he was also mindful to “provide flexibility in industries such as healthcare and landscaping, where there is an essential economic or social need.”

In addition, “sector-specific needs have already been catered for through the different Dependency Ratio Ceilings for the five sectors – Services, Manufacturing, Construction, Marine and Process.” Other solutions for raising productivity seems to revolve around throwing more money into the sectors in question, such as S$450 million over three years for the construction industry to adopt more technology to reduce manpower reliance.

The success of such measures remain to be seen, but meanwhile, the threat of a return to earlier foreign labour grown currently hangs over us with one benchmark – productivity. Whereas the White Paper had earlier suggested that foreign workers are needed to make up for our slow population growth – as if babies can be put to work to support our economy – the new mantra is now to focus on Singaporeans’ contribution to economic growth.

Essentially, would a further drop in productivity signal the government to salvage faltering GDP figures by returning to unrestrained foreign labour growth?

(Image - gov.sg YouTube channel)
(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

Cultural persuasion

Beyond this supposed management of foreign manpower, efforts have also been made to inculcate a greater acceptance towards a growing population of foreigners or “new citizens”. The

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the government creating an entire series of videos to encourage Singaporeans to “Think About It” and hopefully bring a different perspective on why foreign workers are important to Singapore society and our economy.

The series consists of mini “dramas” that depict Singaporeans presumably xenophobic attitudes countered by a more restrained logical evaluation. There are also forums held with media personalities, community leaders and politicians to debate the issue.

Comments to the video series had been disabled, so there is no way to ascertain public response to them. Nevertheless, there is a good chance that they have been produced by the government, as they are all hosted on gov.sg’s YouTube channel. We might not ever know the amount of tax-payers’ money specifically spent on the series, but what is clear is that they are in line with the PM’s hope that “people will accept that the government has good intentions” in proposing population augmentation.

Also read “The 6.9 million issue – Part 2: Still short-sighted?

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前高级公务员强抱女下属罪成 控方促判监九个月严惩

前高级公务员强抱女下属罪成,涉嫌滥用职权,占女下属便宜,控方促请法官严惩他。 67岁被告于2016年6月至7月间,紧抱55岁受害者,让对方的胸部贴他身体,罪名成立。此外,被告亦面临共九项非礼罪,其中包括法官在上月裁定被告非礼43岁受害者五项罪名不成立。 控方今日(4日)针对刑罚陈词时,指被告案发时是法定机构的高级公务员,涉及公众利益,而且工作场所对发生性骚扰事件零容忍。 此外,被告是预谋犯案,其行为已导致受害者受到心理伤害,尤其是在工作场所的性罪案,受害者往往因上下属级关系,担心影响工作,加上以为自己会是唯一受害者,若告发很可能会不被采信,才会选择不举报。 被告对此也毫无悔意,在审讯期间指受害者先主动。因此,控方表示,被告违背信任,滥用职权,占受害者便宜,其刑罚必须发出阻赫作用,以示警戒。 然而,辩护律师则称,被告罪行不至于坐牢。律师求情时表示,被告是紧抱受害者一二秒钟,非常短暂且无肌肤接触。被告也没用手触摸受害者的敏感部位。 此外,并无证据显示,受害者心里受到伤害。 至于控方所说的违背信任,律师则反驳被告和受害者是上司下属的关系,并无其他关系如师生、亲子之间的信任关系,因此不能说是违背信任。 律师也提到,被告把一生奉献给教育界,他做出许多贡献,获得不少奖状。他也对社区做出许多贡献。法庭在判刑时应考虑他在公共服务的贡献,且目前被告已退休。 他面对九项非礼控状,除了上述经过审讯的六项控状,另三项暂时搁下。这三项涉及55岁受害者的控状指被告跟她出差时非礼她,地点包括越南的酒店、缅甸仰光的机场和菲律宾马尼拉的一间餐厅。

Dr Chia Shi Lu isn't the only PAP MP who has walked the ground since circuit breaker measures were announced

Since the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) report was released on 13…

10 key issues which define Lee Hsien Loong’s 14 years in power (Part 1 on Strategic Direction)

Sunday (12 Aug) marks the 14th Anniversary since Lee Hsien Loong took…

Myanmar junta hits ethnic rebels with air strikes near India border

YANGON, MYANMAR — Myanmar’s junta has carried out air strikes on an…