ida

The Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of Singapore says its investigations have shown that its employee, Nisha Padmanabhan, “did not deceive” the statutory board when she included her MBA degree in her job application.

Her MBA has been the focus of controversy in recent weeks because it is issued from the web-based Southern Pacific University (SPU), a suspected degree mill.

SPU, which had been operating in Hawaii, was apparently shut down by a court order in 2002, is now reported to be operating from Malaysia.

Members of the public have been slamming the IDA and inundating it with questions over the matter since the news first broke.

The IDA had initially defended its hiring of Ms Nisha, saying:

“Nisha pursued an MBA out of personal interest, and it was not a relevant certificate for her position in IDA though she was open about the fact that she had obtained it.

“Her MBA from Southern Pacific University was not a factor that contributed to her employment at IDA.” (See here.)

Later, the IDA seemed to have changed its position when it said it was “continuing to look into” the matter, as public uproar continued.

Now, the IDA has confirmed its position – that Ms Nisha’s employment was not based on considerations of her MBA degree “as her position required only a bachelor’s degree, and that it also considered her relevant skills and prior work experience”, according to the Straits Times.

Ms Nisha, an Indian-born Singapore citizen who has been working here since 2006 and for IDA since 2014, has a Bachelor’s degree in electronics and telecommunication from the University of Mumbai in India.

“She had genuinely believed her MBA programme to be bona fide, and she had put in effort to obtain the qualification,” the IDA said.

The statutory board under the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) added:

“We have conducted a thorough investigation into the matter, taking into account the various concerns raised. We have assessed the facts and interviewed Nisha Padmanabhan, and are satisfied that she did not deceive or mislead IDA by citing the MBA in her CV when she applied to IDA for a job.”

Reaction to the IDA’s statement on Friday has been fast and furious, with majority expressing disappointment with the stat board.

You can read the reactions and IDA’s full statement here.

Members of the public have also been posting further suspected cases of fake degrees, or degrees from known degree mills, in the possession of employees here in Singapore.

One of these is Ngee Ann Polytechnic (NP) media lecturer, Belgian Marc Jonet, 52, who received a master’s in education from non-accredited, online-based Breyer State University three years ago.

He is also reported to be graduating with a PhD in psychology from the same university later this year.

He has been with the polytechnic’s School of Film and Media Studies for about 15 years.

Mr Jonet was hired based on his prior work experience covering more than 10 years, which included editing and post-production work.

In a statement on the matter, the polytechnic said “Mr Jonet pursued the master’s programme of his own accord, and that it was not a job requirement and had no bearing on his progression at the institution”, according to local press reports.

Subscribe
Notify of
98 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

社论:为何无法公开新保网袭主谋?

昨日,主管网络安全事务的通讯及新闻部长易华仁,在国会针对新保网袭事件指出,尽管已经明确知道发动网袭的主谋,但政府决定不公开袭击者身份,因为“不符合国家利益”。 根据《联合早报》报导,易华仁称“已经采取适当行动,也知道袭击者的身份。”但是基于国家安全理由,他不愿多加置评,却又没说明已经采取了什么“适当行动”。 这与易华仁在去年八月底部长声明有别,他当时说,尽管掌握把握袭击者身份,却无法百分百确定。 也有议员追问,究竟我国对袭击者采取了什么行动?易华仁也遭质问政府不揭露袭击者的考量。 对此,易华仁指出,我国现在并非没有法律对境内袭击者采取行动,而是公开指名道姓,“是否会我国有利。” 与此同时,他又告知议员们不应只专注于为何政府公开袭击者身份,而是要了解政府的反应和应对措施。 银行遭劫  保安被解雇  却不公布劫匪身份? 吊诡的是,新保集团和IHiS公司因为网袭事件被惩戒,被罚款100万元,还有两名IHiS员工还为此丢了饭碗,一些高层则接受被罚款(却未公布罚款金额)。 打个比方形容:一家银行被手段老练的抢匪打抢了,保安人员因为防守不力被解雇、银行经理被罚款,但是打抢银行、仍逍遥法外的犯罪份子,他们的身份却基于“银行利益”必须保密?把钱放入银行的客户也不得而知,究竟是谁抢了银行? 根据个资保护委会的文告,去年发生的新保集团网袭事件历来最严重,导致约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。…

HDB’s lease decay issue should rank high on national agenda as we cannot continue ignoring ‘the elephant in the room’, says WP’s Louis Chua

Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang GRC Louis Chua Kheng Wee on…

送保姆照顾 女婴腿骨断裂 新马网民心疼

马来西亚一名3个月大女婴送保姆家照顾,返家后却发现左腿骨断裂,怀疑女婴受虐,父母愤而报警。此新闻在网络疯传,网民对女婴遭遇感心疼。 据莎阿南警区主任巴哈鲁丁助理总监称,女婴父亲莫哈末慕新是莎阿南议员的医疗助理,母亲则是医生。他们甫于两周前,将女婴交由朱家附近的保姆照顾。 女婴在当天早上7天被送托保姆照顾,父亲在当天3时15分接女婴回家,但是女婴不停哭闹,夫妻俩觉得有异,决定带她到医院检查,才发现女婴左腿骨断裂。 怀疑女婴是在保姆照看期间受虐,莫哈末决定报警。不过基于保姆已返乡过开斋节,警方会在节日后传召保姆作进一步调查。莫哈末将根据警方和医疗报告,决定是否提出诉讼。 保姆也有照顾其他小孩,迄今仍无法确定保姆涉及虐待。 父亲莫哈末在脸书上贴文也引来新马网民关注,看到照片中懵懂可爱的女婴躺在病床,大家都感到心疼,除了希望警方尽快调查该保姆是否涉嫌虐待,也安慰家长,祝福女婴早日康复。 网民Ann Lim感慨,非常尽责的保姆难求,也认为如果孩子还没学说话,就尽量自己照看,交给陌生人照顾很危险。 网民叶慧玲也认为自己的孩子还是自己带,而且请保姆也好花钱;Mavis Mok心疼小朋友,因为大人心情不好却要受罪。 也有网民认为,虽然孩子自己照顾最好,但是现今社会都是双薪家庭,父母都得在外打拼,实在不得已才把孩子交托保姆照顾。为此一般民众都是选择交给自己的父母、熟悉的亲友照顾才放心。 马法规:照顾4名以上孩童需注册…

Catering firm fined S$5,000 for improper food storage and poor maintenance

Catering company AG (Global) Events Catering was fined S$5,000 today for the…