Jason Neo’s posting

Jason Neo's posting

A member of the public has posted a query with the Singapore Police Force (SPF) over a four-year old incident involving a former Young PAP (YPAP) member.

Mr Paul Chen, posting on the SPF’s Facebook page on Tuesday, was referring to the incident involving then YPAP member, Jason Neo, in 2011.

Mr Neo had posted online a photo he had taken of a school bus with Malay children from Huda Kindergarten, in Woodlands. The children were dressed in their uniform which includes traditional Malay headwear.

Mr Neo captioned the photo: “Bus filled with young terrorist trainees?”

His post went viral and caused a huge uproar of protests from many Singaporeans and members of the public.

Two PAP Members of Parliament who were also YPAP leaders had to later tender their apologies personally to the school.

Under public pressure, Mr Neo later resigned from the YPAP altogether.

He had also issued an “unreserved apology” to the Muslim community.

At least three police reports were made against Mr Neo then, and the police were reported to be investigating the incident.

However, as Mr Chen pointed out, it has been four years since and no updates from the authorities on the investigations seem to have been provided.

Mr Chen’s query with the SPF compared Mr Neo’s case with that of the more recent one involving 16-year old Amos Yee, who was charged on Tuesday for a video criticising Christianity and ridiculing former Singapore Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew.

“I would like to applaud SPF for the swift action against Amos Yee who made insensitive remarks against the religious in his youtube video which he posted some days ago,” Mr Yee told the police. “I understood that one of the charges he faced is section 298 of penal code…”

“I do understand the rationale behind this charge,” Mr Chen said. “However, there is another case which happened more than 3 years ago which involved a former YPAP member who made a racist remark on Muslim kids. I am sure his remarks hurt a lot of Muslim feelings. A few police reports were made against Jason Neo the person who made the remarks but as of now, there is no feed back from the I/O.”

He was referring to the police officer in charge of the Neo case.

“My question is, how come the time taken by the SPF to take action against these two persons [Yee and Neo] is so much different considering both of them committed the same crime under section 298 penal code (if i understand the penal code correctly)?”

Mr Chen concluded:

“I believe in the professionalism of SPF in carry out their duties fairly and equally regardless of who committed the crime. Looking forward to your reply soon.”

You can read his post on the SPF Facebook page here.

“If Amos Yee is being charged under section 298 penal code, then I am sure all the more Jason Neo should be charged under this code too,” Mr Chen told The Online Citizen (TOC).

“Jason Neo racist remarks are worse than what Amos has said.”

cheong

Another case in 2013 involved former NTUC assistant director of membership, Amy Cheong, who was an Australian citizen and a Singapore permanent resident.

Ms Cheong had posted a racist rant online where she disparaged Malays for what she perceived to be their low-cost and lengthy void-deck weddings, and also mocked their divorce rate.

She was eventually issued a “stern warning” by the authorities.

Ms Cheong has since returned to Australia.

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CISCO officer: I could have made more arrests

By Terry Xu Auxiliary police officer Srisivasangkar Subramaniam, who has been working…

英兰妮为唯才是举背书 为何不谈德才兼备?

上周四(18日),总理公署部长英兰妮席由国大文学暨社会科学院社会服务研究中心主办,探讨如何援助低收入家庭。期间她表示,第四代政府领导班子的任务,是为国人在每个人生阶段创造机会,确保一个人的成就不取决于出身。 英兰妮兼任财政部及教育部第二部长。她说,不平等和社会流动问题早在1965年的“新加坡独立宣言”中就已提到。不同的是当年大家一样穷,随着经济发展,不同收入的家庭累积资源不均,大家因此关注底层孩子的起跑点会越来越落于人后,妨碍社会流动。 不过,本地中文媒体未提及英兰妮针对“唯才是举”(meritocracy)阐述的看法。本地英语媒体都有报导,英兰妮为唯才是举制背书,认为重新审视唯才是举制不是正确的做法。 记者节译刊载于《海峡时报》的英兰妮致辞稿,在演讲中英兰妮指出,唯才是举根据个人表现能力委任职务,能遏制贪腐和裙带关系,如果废除掉唯才是举制度,就等同邀请那些弊端腐蚀国家的体制。 “每个人都想达成最佳成就” “哪个父母不想孩子成龙成凤?学生们也有自己的理想抱负。每一代人都希望能达致最佳的成就,阻止他们是不对的。” 英兰妮辩护,问题的关键并不是唯才是举制,而是虽然国家和政府已经尽力提供平等机会,但是来自低收入和弱势背景的群体,仍难以跻身获得这些机会。 “所以,我们的方针不应该是为往上爬设顶限;要缩减鸿沟让大家可以一起向上,应改善那些较弱势一群的机遇、提供充分的机会。让唯才是举制发挥作用。” 她补充,与此同时也需要有多元管道来追求事业和成就,确保持续的社会流动。“有些人脚步较快,有些较慢;有者可能走相似的道路,有者走较少走的小径。在他们自身的努力,如果需要政府或他人的支持下,大家最终都能取得好的结果–当然不一定是同样的成果。” 所以,政府的措施是双重的,英兰妮强调政府一方面继续加强对少数群体的支持,其次则继续建设在每个人生阶段“充满机遇的社会”。 政治精英对唯才是举制爱不释手 新加坡的政治精英始终舍不得唯才是举制。有多少年来,我们奉唯才是举之名,精英群体都被被行销成有才干、有智慧、有表现绩效的精英,因为他们闪亮的奖学金、受过英语教育、世家背景和一大串的奖项和(军事)资历,就更容易被纳入精英圈子中。…

以居民护鸡事件为题材 本地导演短片却无缘在新民阁首映

本地新锐导演张俊峰为新民阁居民拍摄短片《新民》,却遭居民委会拒绝,无缘在新民阁首映。 《新民》短片以新民阁曾引起的争议野鸡为题材,短片内以本地语言特色为主,刻画一名65岁独居老妇与新民阁组屋楼下的野鸡作伴的日子。 去年,因当局收到多宗投诉后,欲捕杀掉这些居住在该区的鸡群,新民阁(Sin Ming Court)为是否要让原鸡(red jungle fowl)继续在该社区栖息,进行投票。 逾千居民中,有90巴仙的人支持不干扰鸡群,让他们继续“住下去”。根据投票结果显示,居民们决定继续和鸡群和平相处,同时保住了这些鸡群的栖息地。 大多数居民认为鸡并不会干扰他们的生活,但清晨鸡啼扰梦,多少会让人困扰。 新民阁居民保留鸡群,本地导演获灵感拍摄 导演张峻峰对于居民们集体善举而感动,决定借此题材,将新民阁人与野鸡和平共处的现象拍摄下来。他向《海峡时报》透露,“在2017年时,当我知道当局因为20多通的居民通报而决定要扑杀鸡群时,我感到相当愤怒” 因此他当时想象有个居民为了拯救鸡群而在社区内跑来跑去,捕捉这些鸡拯救它们,后续才将这些想象延伸为短片。…