MARUAH 377A discussion forumThe rationale used by the Court of Appeal to declare Section 377A of the Penal Code constitutional “goes against international human rights norms” and is a “perilous step back for human rights in Singapore”, said human rights group MARUAH in a statement following a panel discussion on Sunday on the same subject matter.

MARUAH’s president Braema Mathi issued the statement on behalf of the discussion group, which included lawyers M Ravi and Peter Low, blogger Alex Au and law professor Jack Lee. The panel spoke at the event “Section 377A: What Does It Constitute?”

In October 2014, the Court of Appeal has rejected two separate Constitutional challenges to Section 377A of the Penal Code, the law that criminalises sex between men, maintaining that the law does not contravene Singapore’s Constitution.

The cases, brought by Tan Eng Hong and gay couple Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee, have sought to contended that the provision is discriminatory and should be declared void by the court, as it infringes their right to equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by Article 12 of the Constitution, and violates their right to life and liberty, as guaranteed by Article 9.

“The rather narrow interpretation of Articles 9 and 12, vis-a-vis Section 377A, has left the SOGI (Sexual Orientation Gay Identities) community little recourse in claiming their personal freedom and dignity,” said MARUAH in the statement.

MARUAH 377A forum banner“As a law, Section 377A of the Penal Code violates fundamental human rights – among them the right to privacy, to freedom from discrimination and freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention. It also adds to the stigma and abuses that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people do face.”

“MARUAH is clear that Governments have a duty to protect people from prejudice, not to add to it. Public hostility towards gay and lesbian people can never justify violating their fundamental human rights.

The statement indicated that there is no mention of any gender, sex or sexual orientation in Article 12, and the arguments on cultural relativism, societal morality and rights of all individuals in Singapore are not in sync.

MARUAH also affirmed Singapore’s position as a secular state, where the laws of the land come from the Constitution, which should be regarded as a contract between the people and the government on sovereignty, structure and principles for the country.

The group ended the statement by calling for education on the Constitution and citizenship rights; amendments to the Constitution to offer equality to all citizens regardless of race, language, religion and gender; and affirmation that Singapore is a secular country in its ideology that appreciates the diversity.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Couple arrested for allegedly leaking press release by MOE and MSF on school closures

A couple have been arrested for allegedly leaking a joint press release…

SDP’s Paul Tambyah says that Singapore’s border may not remain shut until December

Given that Singapore is an open economy and is dependent on trade…

Playwright Alfian Sa’at slams PAP’s Tan Wu Meng for using him as a way to attack an opposition politician

Singaporean playwright Alfian Sa’at took to his Facebook today (19 June) to…

“无法相信所听见的事实“ 红娘公司创办人分享确诊心路历程

在疫情肆虐之际,患者数不断攀升,但每一数字都代表着一位患者,而每一位患者身上都拥有自己的故事,而我们从不了解,他们自发生症状起至被检测送入医院时,到底带着什么样的心情故事。今天就带大家来了解,患者在入院到底曾经历过什么? 是的,我就是第667号患者,这并不是迟来的四月一号愚人节。 日前,一名网友Violet Lim(林笑岏)披露自己从发现症状、接受冠状病毒19检测,结果呈阳性反应的历程。 也是红娘公司Lunch Actually创办人的她,忆述在3月25日凌晨2点时,突然醒来感觉到头痛,胸口也开始有一股无法形容的胸闷。于是她从床上爬起来到她5米远的地方拿水杯,突然感觉到呼吸急促,但不是一般的气喘,却感觉到呼吸有点困难。 “第一反应是,天啊,这不是冠状病毒19的症状吗?” 林笑岏开始忆述,自己在疫情爆发时都相当谨慎,例如定期消毒和勤洗手、不去拥挤的地方,甚至为了避免大规模感染,她也取消了自己的生日宴。 而且自2月中旬,公司也安排了室内和室外的团队进行工作,而他也属于室外的团队,所以自2月份起,就没有在回到公司,或是遇到任何客户或同事,即指感染的机会较少。 根据卫生部的资料,第667例曾到过美国,属入境病例。 林笑岏在带着各种担心与忧虑下,她决定在隔日早晨去到综合诊所求诊。她也向医生老实交代了个人旅行史后,医生也立即为她开转介信到国家传染病中心。 鼻拭子检测时最痛苦,但医生护士积极乐观对待病人…