gerald indranee

Senior Minister of State for Law Indranee Rajah said that only two applications have been made by the government to revoke patents since 2001, and that both were made to the High Court because they involved counterclaim proceedings.

Ms Rajah was responding to queries from Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Gerald Giam, who asked raised the question to the Law Ministry in Parliament on Thursday.

He also asked if the government or government-linked companies have in Singapore have applied to the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) instead for revocation of patents, registered trademarks or registered designs belonging to local intellectual property (IP) owners; the main reasons for revocation; and how many complaints has the Government received from local IP owners about ministries, agencies and statutory boards or GLCs in Singapore infringing their IP rights.

Ms Rajah noted that the two cases to revoke patents by government agencies were Mobilestats Technologies Pte Ltd versus the Ministry of Defense, and Mr Yiap Hang Boon versus the Housing Development Board. Both applications for revocation were approved.

However, she did not go into details on the reasons for revocation apart from citing that patent claims are judged on the basis of the individual patent’s novelty, innovation and industrial application.

Mr Giam also asked for the considerations for government agencies to go to the courts instead of IPOS to apply for revocation of patents, and if IPOS would grant patents to inventions that are not patentable – meaning they are not new, do not have an inventive step or do not have an industrial application.

Ms Rajah said that patent protection varies from country to country and it is not possible to expect IPOS to carry out complete checks on all patents. She also added that all patents are open to patent challenges all the time.

Noting that the patent search and examination process is a highly technical and complex process and that it took IPOS years to build up its patent search and examination capabilities, Mr Giam then asked if the courts would have the necessary technical expertise to decide if patents are invalid.

Ms Rajah responded that the application to revoke patents will be supported by the evidence provided by expert witnesses brought to court.

She also said that the two cases of patents revoked by government agencies did not affect the confidence that businesses have in Singapore. This is in response to Mr Giam’s question on whether the recent cases between the government and entrepreneurs might have affected confidence among local and foreign businesses about Singapore’s position as a good place develop and launch their intellectual property.

Early in January, TOC covered Mobilestats’ case against the Ministry of Defence, where inventor Dr Ting Choon Meng has sued MINDEF for deliberately infringed the company’s patent, but had to give up the case due to mounting legal expenses.

MINDEF had sought a court ruling to have the patent revoked, and had recently issued a statement to deny Dr Ting’s account.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

针对诉求和反馈 普杰立:必要时公开事主个资避免误导民众

针对本社之前报导,一名患红斑狼疮的单亲妈妈申请公积金遭拒一事,政府当局有话说,认为本社应该公开部分个人资料,如真实姓名,以方便查询和跟进,也可避免误导民众。 交通部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,周一(2月3日)在国会指出,若接获公开投诉或请愿,政府会公开部分的相关个人资料,不会全部都公布出来。 特斯拉副教授询问政府,在避免泄漏太多个人隐私的前提下,当局是否根据实际情况公布投诉,或申诉事主的个人信息。 普杰立回答,公布个人信息,主要是让有关机构能够避免引起争议或误解,且所公布的信息也会非常具体,让相关人士掌握更为全面的信息,甚至在必要时能够质疑政府的说法。 需要时公开部分资料 他表示,虽然有些公开投诉是匿名进行,但是政府还是在需要时公布部分资料,如投诉者身份,以便减少政府在陈述事实时出现任何模糊不清的情况,也能够减少民众的猜疑。 “当投诉存在不准确性,政府必须做出纠正,提供准确信息,这样除了能够维护政府的公信力之外,也能有效地为民服务。” “若民众被误导了,可能会引起他们忧虑,甚至会根据错误信息采取行动,做出不利于自己的决定。” 他们是针对本社于去年12月17日作出的报导,指一名患有红斑狼疮的单亲妈妈因为病情待业多年,因而申请领出公积金以养活家人,却遭拒绝的事件。 主流媒体亦未提及蔡女士真名 事实上,并非只有本社做出了有关报导,《新明日报》也报导了相关新闻,并且还有跟进新闻,然而该社首次做出的报导用了“蔡女士”,第二次用的报导则跟随本社使用了“蔡莉莉”(译音)。 公积金局事后曾做出澄清,公开了当事人的姓名和求医详情,更指有关报导不够全面。文告中指出,已有数个政府机构都积极提供协助了,报导中却没有提到,并且在报导新闻时使用假名。…

香港茶餐厅业者被指在狮城办集会,遭警方扣押护照

香港“华记茶餐厅”业者杨官华,涉嫌在我国无准证聚会谈修例风波,恐构成非法集会罪名,护照遭扣押,至今无法离境。 杨官华自修例风波以来,频繁发布相关评论视频而逐渐成为网红,他目前在东京与大阪开设港式茶餐厅,同时也是知名Youtube频道“华记正能量(Alex Yeung channel)”的版主。 11月4日,杨官华上载了一段Youtube 视频,声称他于10月10日到新加坡开发生意商机时,却遭指在我国公开谈论他国政治。据悉,他曾在新加坡滨海湾一带的一家餐厅举行闲聊聚会,让新加坡民众发表目前香港政治的局势与意见。 此举却引来网民的怀疑,指控他在未经申请,公开谈论他国政治,属违法行为。 然而,在他广邀大家参加聚会后,杨官华突然在网上沉寂了一段时间,当时网民纷纷猜测他是否因此而被捕入狱。 直至本周一(4日),杨官华再度现身社交媒体中,表示目前仍在新加坡接受调查,而他直指可能会入狱。 他声称,原本只是计划在新加坡投资餐厅与置产,但却因为在考察期间与人合照,却遭对方暗中报警指他违反狮城法令,因此才会被警方调查。 他也表示,目前护照已被扣押,而且直指是被“反对派”的人陷害,但他表示自己也会尊重我国法律与警察,并向网民强调,千万不要将事情政治化,相信一切会水落石出。 根据《公共秩序法案》,户外的公众游行与集会需要警察许可,否则即属违法。警方也提醒不会批准任何涉宣扬他国/区域政治目的的集会,呼吁游客应遵守我国法律。…

Workers' Party MPs to ask about the closure of four JCs in parliament next week

Next week in parliament, Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliaments (MPs) will…