swift vehicle

The Ministry of Defence has responded to allegations that it had infringed patent rights of the Station With Immediate First-Aid Treatment (SWIFT) vehicle.

Mindef’s statement, which was posted on its Cyberpioneer Facebook page on Tuesday:

Some of you may have come across online articles alleging that the mobile battalion casualty station (BCS) bought by MINDEF had infringed MobileStats Technologies’ (MobileStats) patent for its “Mobile First Aid Post”. On top of that, the articles suggest that MINDEF is forcing MobileStats to close down, so as take over the patent rights.

It sounds like a great story, but all these accusations are false and baseless. We spoke to MINDEF’s legal team to find out more, and decided to put out some facts so that you know the truth.

First, the false allegations of patent infringement are not new. Since 2011, the owner of MobileStats has repeatedly turned to the media to accuse MINDEF of infringing its patent. Second, these accusations have been deliberated by the High Court and found to be untrue. In January 2014, the Court declared the patent invalid and revoked it. The Court also found that MINDEF had not committed any Intellectual Property infringement. We are disappointed that the owner of MobileStats has disrespected the Court’s decision, and continues to make false and unsubstantiated accusations against MINDEF. MINDEF regards these allegations very seriously and is referring them to the Attorney-General’s Chambers for advice.

If you still have burning questions, read on.

#1 Did MINDEF infringe MobileStats’ patent and try to get away with it? 

The Court has considered all factors and ruled that the patent is invalid. MINDEF did not infringe any patent as you can’t infringe a patent that was never valid in the first place. MobileStats had patented an idea that has existed since the 1970s (just Google the “mobile medical unit” concept, or see http://youtu.be/evcI-KcZw5E). Just as there are many smartphone designs and manufacturers who do not infringe each other’s patents, there are also many ways to design and produce military equipment like the BCS. MINDEF respects Intellectual Property laws and honours patents that are valid. When there are disputes over the validity of patents, parties can bring the matter to court. Just as you can file patents to prevent unauthorised copying of your inventions, so can others challenge your patents if they do not involve new ideas. Most importantly, MINDEF is just a buyer, not the manufacturer. If MobileStats believes it has a valid case, it should pursue the matter with the manufacturer, not the user.

#2 Did MINDEF engage in unfair procurement practices?

The case was actually a commercial dispute between MobileStats Technologies and Syntech Engineers, which supplied the mobile BCS to MINDEF. As the manufacturer of the mobile BCS, the supplier, not the consumer, is responsible for honouring valid patents. MINDEF’s actions were correct and above board. All of MINDEF’s suppliers are required to uphold Intellectual Property laws and obtain the necessary licenses so that MINDEF is free to use the products that we have paid for. MINDEF simply wants the freedom to deploy our mobile BCS for training and operations and has no interest in acquiring MobileStats’ alleged patents. It is unclear why the owners of MobileStats chose to take legal actions against the consumer, instead of the manufacturer. Imagine if Apple sued Samsung handphone users – instead of Samsung Electronics – for allegedly infringing Apple’s Intellectual Property rights.

#3 Is MINDEF out to destroy MobileStats with the prolonged court case and the demand for the payment of $580K?

This is false. MINDEF did not initiate the legal action. It was MobileStats who inexplicably chose to sue MINDEF instead of the manufacturer. In defending ourselves, MINDEF’s conduct was in full compliance with court regulations and never found lacking.

$580K was the amount that the court decided MobileStats should reimburse MINDEF for our legal fees. Not a single cent will be kept by MINDEF. The money will go to Syntech, the BCS vendor, who honoured their legal obligation to MINDEF and bore the cost of the legal proceedings.

When legal actions are initiated against government agencies like MINDEF, these agencies need to respond. Public resources and monies are expended needlessly if such lawsuits are without merit. As a government organisation, MINDEF has a duty to protect our public monies. We regard such lawsuits taken against MINDEF with the utmost seriousness.

Subscribe
Notify of
52 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

2020年大选:政治的分水岭和希望重生

来自博客Jentrified Citizen 数十年来,许多新加坡人一直笼罩在无可匹敌的巨人下,即人民行动党(PAP)。我们眼睁睁看着他们扰乱了我们的宪法,并强制实行了如《防假消息法》这样不民主的压迫性法律。 当我们亲眼看见他们如何打击异议者,摧毁当时工人党的领头羊–老惹耶勒南(JB Jeyaratnam)、邓亮洪和民主党徐顺全的名声和生活时,潸然泪下。当他们以傲慢和不尊重的姿态对待我们,使我们感觉更像二等公民时,我们备受伤害和羞辱。 在经历2015年大选后,人民行动党赢得近七成的选票,成绩可说是相当令人失望,许多期待新加坡作出改变的人民也变得沮丧,因为等待我们的即是执政党对我们的加强严控,更任由网络枪手(Internet Brigade)肆虐,加剧了其政治品牌的“毒性”。随着《防假消息法》的实施,其绝望感日益增长。这些法律据称是为了打击网络中的虚假新闻,但事实上,它却成为执政党的武器,最终有些声音只能被迫沉默下来,隧道尽头的光也逐渐暗淡。 2020年大选使人民重燃希望 然而,随着2020年7月11日的大选的结果出炉,又重新燃起了许多人的希望。黎明时分,你甚至会听到后港和盛港人民在街道上响起热烈的欢呼和掌声,回荡全岛。 确实,我们非常值得庆祝。这次是我国独立以来,第二次所有选区都有人上阵,这非常重要。有好些年,一些选区不劳而获,部分因素与政治分肥(pork barrel politics)和杰利蝾螈(gerrymandering)现象有关,…

Forum Asia strongly condemns sodomy conviction of Malaysia’s opposition leader

Forum Asia, a regional human rights group has issued a statement to condemn the decision…

为单亲妈妈发声疑事实有出入 吴家和接POFMA更正指示

社运份子吴家和日前分享一则单亲妈妈被赶出租赁组屋的故事,引起许多民众关注并捐赠给她;岂料实情并非如此,国家发展部透过防止网络假信息和网络操纵办事处(POFMA Office),向吴家和与本地社会政治网站The Independent Singapore(简称TISG)发出更正指示。 2月19日,吴家和于脸书上发文,一位名为莉娜的单亲母亲向他求助,她与六名孩子因无力支付租金被赶出租赁组屋,正在她亲人家暂居。 据吴家和指出,其孩子均仍在上学阶段,年龄分别为14岁、12岁、9岁、8岁、五岁和一名两个月的孩子。 她告知吴家和,由于拖欠租金而被赶出来,她也正开始工作并已向社会家庭发展部申请社区关怀(ComCare)的援助计划。 同时她也要求提供奶粉供宝宝喝,以及为孩子们的EZ-Link充值,让孩子们能够搭上巴士。 消息一出,也引起本地社会政治网站The Independent Singapore的注意并将其报道,民众在看见帖文与报道后,也纷纷加入捐款行列,欲协助可怜的单亲母亲度过难关。 事实与报导有出入…

Singapore authorities should immediately quash conviction of human rights activist Jolovan Wham, says Human Rights Watch

Singapore authorities should immediately quash the conviction of human rights activist Jolovan…