ERP
A new road pricing system that relies on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology can help traffic management in many ways, said Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew on Monday, 3 November, and that it would not be financially prudent to continue with the current Electronic Road Pricing gantry system in the long term.
Lui_Tuck_YewMr Lui was responding to the questions posed by MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC Zainal Sapari.
Mr Zainal Sapari had asked about the 18-month evaluation study on the road management measures that had lead to the next generation ERP system based on GNSS, the difference between the projected cost of maintenance of the current ERP and the new proposed system, and the alternative use of land space freed by the existing gantries.
He also asked for the potential impact on motorists in terms of total ERP charges for long-distance compared to short-distance travellers and whether the Ministry of Transport (MOT) is confident that the outcomes in managing the transport system can be achieved under the proposed system.
Mr Lui said that the technical assessment made on the GNSS was based on three criteria;

  1. To control distance based congestion
  2. To communicate traffic conditions to road users
  3. To implement electronic road pricing

Based on the findings of the 18-month evaluation study, MOT had found the system to be able to meet all three criteria. The GNSS technology allows for distance-based pricing along congested roads, thus making it more equitable for motorists, Mr Lui said.
Under such a system, every vehicle becomes a sensor, which will allow the Land Transport Authority (LTA) to develop a more accurate picture of the traffic situation and intervene if necessary.The LTA can then broadcast this data to motorists to help them plan their journeys and avoid congested roads, he said.
LTA is planning to implement the system by around 2020, he noted.
Mr Lui declined to share details of the financial costing of the system as he said it might affect the ongoing tender for the project.
Last month, the LTA called a tender to develop this system; the tender is still ongoing, Mr Lui said.
He assured Parliament that the current gantry system will not be financially prudent.
“The annual operating cost has risen by 80 per cent over the last decade, and a large part of the system is coming to the end of its cycle, and it will have to be replaced, even if we do not move to a GNSS-based system,” said Mr Lui.
He added that the physical gantries also take up land which can be freed up for more roadside greenery. Although the motorists might miss the sight of ERP gantries when they are turned off, said Mr Lui.
Mr Lui cautioned that while a GNSS-based road pricing system may improve traffic management, it alone cannot ensure that Singapore’s roads continue to be relatively smooth-flowing.
Mr Lui said this would require a holistic approach involving vehicle growth, population controls, as well as enhancing and promoting public transport.
Mr Zainal Sapari asked if there was any issues regarding the system about privacy rights as the GNSS would allow the ability to track the whereabouts of the vehicles.
Mr Lui assured that the data from the system will also be aggregated and anonymised – which means it will not infringe on the privacy of motorists.
MP Cedric Foo asked if the new distance pricing would impact motorists, especially taxi drivers and business owners who require delivery vehicles to travel long distances on roads. He also asked if ERP areas would be enlarged with the new system, where motorists would be charged once they leave home, he jokingly commented.
Mr Lui replied that MOT will try to implement an equitable pricing for motorists and would try to offer as fair a solution as possible. Responding to the enlarging of ERP areas, he referred to the point made in May 2013, and said that the pricing will be based on congestion along the road.
Gerald Giam’s asked if the data collected from the system would fall under the personal data protection act and whether the Ministry will make public what the information would be used for.
Mr Lui reiterated his point on anonymised data and said that modern handphones already have functions which would allow individuals to be tracked, and therefore he thinks that it would not be of any concern.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【国际视角】黎巴嫩首都发生大爆炸

黎巴嫩首都贝鲁特港口,在本月4日下午发生大爆炸事故,造成78人死亡,近4000人受伤。 爆炸威力强大,连远至200公里外的塞浦路斯都能感到震动,当地居民还拍摄到爆炸现场形成蘑菇云。 据了解事缘爆炸现场附近,有储存爆炸品和化学物品的仓库,事发前仓库还发生火警。 黎巴嫩安全总局认为, 爆炸可能是由储存在仓库、2750吨充公得来的高爆炸性物料硝酸铵所引起。 这些物品2014年以来,就一直被扣押在港口,但港口人员多年来却没有做保护措施。  

Selby Jennings: Southeast Asia mid-senior finance professionals have low job confidence about job prospects

According to the new survey by Selby Jennings research, 6 in 10…

五年前被指杀人、被引渡槟城关四个月 公民莫汉要向当局讨说法

“很多人都以为我杀了人… 我在工作场所众目睽睽下当众被逮捕,这是天大的耻辱。” 50岁的莫汉(Mohan Rajangam),原本在一家物流公司兢兢业业,但是五年前,他原本平静的日子却迎来了天翻地覆的可怕经历—-他被指控涉嫌一宗在马来西亚槟城发生的谋杀案,警方直接突击他的工作场所搜查并逮捕他,而后再被转交马国。 他在马国逗留长达四个月,但是马国法庭未提控他,最终因未涉及谋杀嫌疑被释放。然而这段经历却让他饱受煎熬,除了健康受影响,他也为此丢失工作。莫汉选择在生活重归轨道的五年后,才愿意口述自己的故事。 一切来得太突然 莫汉忆述,2015年的3月21日,近20名警官突然杀到他的工作地点,“我把我的身份证给他们看,然后他们带着我上公司三楼翻查所有事物,再为我上手铐,去翻查我的车,搜出我的护照”。他指警方搜查时没有说明任何理由。 较后他被押到广东民大厦,接着到肃毒局做尿检、被私会党取缔组问话。莫汉表示他如实告诉他所知的,两个部门都认为他与案子没关联,让他待在拘留处。 莫汉提及其中一位调查官在审问时态度非常恶劣,只是简单问他谋杀案发生当晚他在哪里、做什么,也没在手提电脑上做记录. 莫汉认为,直到罪证确凿,一个人都不应被当成犯人看待,而他感到有关调查官似乎已把他当作犯人;且在被拘留的48小时期间,也未有法律代表。 “48小时后,我以为他们要释放我…但他们为我的手脚上手铐,带我到法庭。其中一位传译员念到’我在2015年3月2日晚9时20分,我在乔治市枪杀一名印裔男子’,我忘了叫什么名。” 莫汉指的枪杀案,死者名为51岁的斯瓦古玛(E…

New green building masterplan is in the works as part of climate mitigation strategy

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) and the Singapore Green Building Council…