Warning: Graphical image in content.
Singapore Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) has released its findings that the injuries on the mutilated cat at Marine Crescent are the doing of dogs in the community and not of human(s).
They have also sent the cat’s carcass to Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) for an independent post-mortem.
In their facebook post, they wrote:

SPCA was alerted –to a cat that was found to be in parts, in Marine Crescent, just yesterday evening (Oct 28, 2014).
We have, since, brought the cat’s carcass to SPCA’s premises, and our vets have conducted a thorough investigation of it. We have arrived at the finding that the cat’s state has been wrought by the action of dogs from the community, and are ruling out the cat’s condition being caused by sole human agency.
We have also sent the carcass to the AVA for an independent post-mortem.
We will post an update once we have derived the AVA’s findings. We thank our informers for having alerted SPCA and the police to the cat’s state.

“We are strongly ruling out wilful human involvement, as there is no clear sign of the use of instruments such as a machete knife, or a chainsaw. It would be virtually impossible for a human being, or humans, to have caused that state of the cat, using other humanly means possible,” SPCA said in a media statement.
Residents of Marine Crescent have told local media that it is unlikely that dogs attacked the cat. “I have never see stray dogs around here”, said Mr Eddy, a resident.
Mdm Grace Tan, a fruit stall assistant has been feeding “Ling Ling” since about a year ago. She found the cat’s remains on a grass patch near and was shocked at what she saw.
The cat was dissected into four parts with a missing leg from the body, its guts and intestines were left by the side of the body with fur scattered around the grass patch.
Mdm Tan says the body of the cat was placed too neatly for it to have been a dog attack or a car accident. “I don’t agree it’s a dog,” said Mdm Tan. “I can’t event imagine it being a dog, I only see stray dogs along the beach.”
According to the local cat caretakers, there have been an average of one missing cat per month for the last 10 months.
Comments on the SPCA’s fanpage have been largely negative. The lack of blood around the cat’s body, bite wounds, sighting of stray dogs in the vicinity and many questionable aspects of the incident have led to criticism of SPCA’s findings.

10743390_10152841633073919_83412576_n
Image of the mutilated cat, “Ling Ling”
Online commenters described SPCA’s findings as a convenient way to close the case, putting blame on stray dogs without investigating further for the real culprit of the act.

“We saw the carcass, no dogs could have been associated with this cats death. 1. There are no bite marks. 2. Dogs can NOT dismember the cats body is such cleaver-like precision. 3. IF it was a pack of dogs, they would have never left the body in such great organization. Dogs will normally shake they prey around, and if in a pack, multiple puncture wounds would exist along with tossing of the carcass may occur.” – Eddie Lee
“SPCA, of all agencies in Singapore, you are one that will at least make a better judgement call. Do your checks again, it’s impossible for dogs to do this. Or is this an excuse for AVA to do more culling? Amazing how our country can blame this work on animals who are unable to defend themselves” – Cherie Ter
It’s totally unfair of a reputable organization like SPCA to quote their conclusion without concrete proof. This will only cause unnecessary alarm to the public, who think that there’s vicious pack in the community. Irresponsible posting.” – Kennes Lau

According to Animal Concerns Research & Education Society (ACRES),  the authorities are investigating the incident.

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Secretary to PM chairs Electoral Boundaries Review Committee

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong disclosed in Parliament on Monday that the…

疑似霸座不点餐被请离席 女客户不甘大骂职员

霸座不点餐,若你是店内职员,你会怎么做?在义顺星巴克的员工在面对类似顾客时,直接请一名霸位不点餐,着装类似商人的女士离席,却引来女士的破口大骂。惟,女员工坦然接受,也没有恶言相向,甚至在妇女离开后,还扬手说“再见”,获得网民纷纷力赞有礼貌。 有关事件过程被网民拍下后上传到社交媒体上,在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff中也有写着“义顺星巴克出现霸座者大骂职员”的帖文,吸引了超过5万6000人观看,获得多大582个留言。 据悉,骂人事件发生于周末(14日)。在视频中,一名身穿深色外套和长裤的女士,没有点餐却坐在星巴克店内的椅子上。 这时,一名星巴克女职员趋前,请女士离席,引起女士的不满,开始指着女职员怒骂。 虽然视频中,大部分女士的说话内容不是很清楚,但是可以看出她是非常严厉的对着女职员“训话”,且长达一分钟,甚至最后还大喊“我警告你!”,似乎想要恐吓女职员。 然而女职员始终保持冷静,甚至在女士转身要离开时,说了声“再见”后就继续工作。 而女士在听到“再见”后,又转身来指着女职员开骂,甚至在女职员和她挥手道别时,越骂越大声。 网民大赞女职员有礼态度 很多网民都对女职员的态度表示欣赏,纷纷表示她冷静应对且不失礼貌的态度,非常值得鼓励。 另一方面,就有很多网民认为女士的态度过分,不应该用手指直指对方,也不应该大声怒骂。“女士应该是知道自己有错,却又很尴尬,所以才发飙的吧。”…

财政部称增消费税提供更多社会支援,反驳“消费税影响低收入户”之言论说

上周一(8日),21岁的本科学生Marcus Aw Chen Feng ,在《海峡时报》论坛里发表一篇评论,对于2021至2025年,消费税即将调涨表达意见。 他写道,“消费税提高,意味着消费品也跟着水涨船高,包括生活必需品的柴米油盐酱醋茶,而其中受到最多影响的亦会是低收入户。他们收入分配上将会减少,亦可能会过得不开心。” “高税金会为经济成长带来负面的影响。生产成本的提高,会增加公司的负担,减低产业上的投资的金额,甚至导致生产链缩减,造成失业率的提升。 作者亦提及,调高消费税或带来高生产成本,可能会减低外国企业入驻新加坡的机率,驳斥“消费税的递增,能对有钱人征收更多税款”之说。 毫无怀疑的,若如Marcus所说,所有高薪部长和公务员将会被征收更多税务,而且不会有人喜欢被征收税务。 今日,财政部企业传播总监林云谦(译名,Lim Yuin Chien)于《海峡时报》的论坛中发表一篇《增加消费税旨在支付更多社会支出》驳斥Marcus的言论。…