han hui hui
22-year old blogger Han Hui Hui was questioned by police for seven hours on Friday in its investigations over a possible offence of unlawful assembly during the CPF protest event which Ms Han had organised on 27th September 2014.

unlawful assembly
During the protest at Hong Lim Park on 27 September, Ms Han led a march of over a hundred supporters. The march involved going into the area where another event which was being held by the Young Men Christian Association (YMCA).

According to news reports, a police spokesman said Ms Han is among “several persons” who are currently assisting them in its investigations. The probe has been ongoing since a police report was lodged on the same day the protest was held.

Ms Han claims that she was asked more than 300 questions by the police during their interview over the seven hours she was kept at the Cantonment Police Complex.

The police spokesman said officers had visited Ms Han’s home on Thursday at about 9.30pm to inform her of the interview “after she did not answer… telephone calls”.

Since she was not home at that point in time, the police said its officers handed the letter to her family member.

The police denied online reports that officers turned up at Ms Han’s house at midnight the night before the interview.

Nonetheless, other interviewees told The Online Citizen (TOC) that plainclothes policemen had visited their homes at midnight. (see report)

Ms Han called the police division at 11pm the same night to reschedule her appointment to 8pm on Friday. But at 1.45pm on Friday, she called the division again to say she would show up at the police station earlier.

The police spokesman reportedly said, “During the interview, Ms Han was provided with refreshments. She took several breaks but she declined an offer to take a break for dinner.”

According to Ms Han, the police asked if she wanted to go for a dinner break at 5.00 pm. As Ms Han wanted to finish the interview as soon as possible, she asked the police officer about how long more the interview would take. She said the police officer told her it would last a further 30 minutes.

Ms Han thus decided she would prefer to continue with the interview.

However, the interview went on for a lot longer, extensions of 30 minutes by the police officer again and again, until 9.30pm.

Online reports also said a notebook Ms Han was using to take down notes during the interview was seized by the police, and that she was not allowed to call her lawyer, M Ravi.

Ms Han said she had declined to hand the notebook over, and it was still taken away from her. She also wanted to transfer the information she had recorded onto the other notebook which she had with her, but was told by the police officer that even if she copied the questions over, this other notebook will be taken away as well.

In its reply to the local media, the police did not address or deny it had indeed confiscated Ms Han’s notebook.
The police also did not deny that Ms Han was told she had no rights to access to legal counsel and was told not to make a call to her lawyer.
The police also did not allow her lawyer to be present during her interview.
After the police interview ended at 9.30pm, Ms Han left the police station, and was met by filmmaker Martyn See.

han hui hui martyn see
Image from Martyn See’s facebook page
The police have yet to respond to TOC’s enquries on the claims of Ms Han at the time of publication and will be added once they reply.

Subscribe
Notify of
161 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

合力追踪数据议题处理不当 前进党忧动摇群众信任不利防疫

“我们对当今国家正在发生的事情深感不安,人民行动党自1月4日起收回此前的说法,表示新加坡警察部队在刑事诉讼法下有权获取“合力追踪”的数据,以作刑事调查。” 本月4日,内政部政务部长陈国明,在国会答复议员质询时表示,刑事诉讼法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据。 此事引发全民议论,部长维文和尚穆根较后澄清,称只有在发生重大罪案时才会启动,但似乎平息不了人民对此事的质疑和失望,甚至有者扬言要删掉该追踪程式。 对此,前进党也发声明回应,重申“人民需要一个透明、独立且对人民负责的政府”,而显然“合力追踪”一事,有悖该追踪程式的初衷,即仅用于对抗如今严峻的疫情。 事实上,主管智慧国计划的外交部长维文,曾在去年6月5日在国会表示,合力追踪数据仅限于防疫追踪用途。他不得不在本月5日再次作出澄清,强调指警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 前进党:此举侵蚀人民对政治机构的信心 “政府要求我们采用合力追踪程式来应付疫情,但时至今日,它却被允许根据刑事诉讼法进行调查。” 此外,声明也表示,政府此举带有更深的含义,且收回说法并非是好的决策,以致于侵蚀人民对政治机构的信心和社会契约。 “对于政府如何处理敏感信息,人民感到非常不安,我们忧心“合力追踪程式”会不必要地暴露用户位置,或侵犯他们的隐私。” 此外,前进党也忧虑政府的越权会全面遏制人民使用合力追踪的可能,反而延缓我国抗疫的进程,尤其当前有消息指出新毒株出现,很可能会白费我国日前的抗疫效果。 “在监督和追踪接触者的过程中,我们必须要同心协力,朝着同一方向前进。因此,我们也担心政府此举会流失人民对国家的信任。 智慧国及数码政府署(Smart…

One Raffles Quay South Tower takes precautionary measures after one confirmed case of coronavirus

One Raffles Quay South Tower (ORQ ST) is operating at the “highest…

Free COVID-19 vaccines for short-term pass holders on extended stay in Singapore: MOH

Short-term pass holders who have been in the country for an extended…