Mr Tan Cheng Bock, former Member of Parliament and candidate in the Presidential Elections 2011 has commented that the discovery of the new boxes has pointed out a weakness in the process and procedure of the electoral system and said that he is puzzled over the advisories issued to the two 17-year old students who found 5 empty ballot boxes in a school. (Facebook note of Mr Tan)
The empty election ballot boxes were found in a school in the Bishan-Toa Payoh division in August last year. One of the students sent a few photos of the boxes to Temasek Review Emeritus (TRE) upon discovering them. He mentioned that he found five boxes in a school storeroom and took a picture with the newspaper on it to prove that the boxes were still around during that period of time (in 2013).
The Elections Department lodged a police report after receiving information about the discovery of the empty boxes.
According to the Police, the ballot boxes were “used and discarded boxes meant to be disposed of” by the Election Department’s waste collectors, except that they did not collect them after the elections.
“There was no evidence that relates to the tampering of ballot boxes before and while in use, and hence no breach of integrity of the electoral process,” said a police spokesman to a local news source.
The students who discovered the boxes were given the warning and counselled by the Police earlier this week. It is unknown if the contractor is being penalized for not completing the disposal work.
Below is the full posting of Mr Tan’s facebook note.

When I read in the papers on the police report that two 17-year-old students were issued advisories and counseled for the ‘unauthorised removal’ of 5 empty ballot boxes found in the storeroom of a school 10 months ago, I was puzzled.
In August 2013, the Elections Department made a police report on the discovery of the five ballot boxes. I commented on the matter in my facebook post of 17 Sep 2013  and I wrote to the Elections Department on 27 Sep 2013 and they replied via their letter on 11 Oct 2013.
I was not satisfied with Elections Department’s reply but decided that I should wait for the police report to be out before I comment further. Now, after 10months of investigations, we are merely told that 2 teenage students were cautioned with police advisories for this offence.
Had it not been for their discovery of the used ballot boxes, Singaporeans would never know of the existence of the new boxes introduced at the counting centres to contain the counted ballot slips.
The ballot boxes in question were among those used in PE 2011 in which I contested.They were left in there for more than 2 years after PE. Singaporeans were told by Minister Chan Chun Sing that the boxes were ‘not controlled’ items after the voting slips had been removed from them.
In fact, he informed us that the used ballot boxes were supposed to be taken away by a contractor for disposal. If the boxes were really of no importance, then it begs the question: why issue advisories to two teenagers who pick up something of no importance? Clearly, the boxes must be of some importance and value to warrant the police issuing the advisories.
The discovery of these ballot boxes have actually highlighted a possible flaw in the process and procedures of the Electoral Voting System. Therefore we should thank the 2 students instead.
Let me explain further.
Click to enlarge
Ballot boxes are specially designed boxes into which voters dropped their ballot slips at the polling stations. After polling is over, these ballot boxes are sealed and transported to the counting centres. The seals on the ballot boxes are then cut open and the ballot slips poured onto a big table for counting. The emptied ballot boxes are put aside and these were the type found in the school store room by the two teenagers.
Discovery of the boxes actually reveal that there were new boxes introduced at the counting centre. These new boxes were not inspected as the candidates and counting agents were not aware of the existence of these new boxes at the counting centres.
Introduction of these new boxes without the candidate and counting agent’s knowledge, create doubts that these boxes may not be empty in the first place.
Is this procedure right? Why the need to bring in these new boxes? Why the need to change?
Let’s look at the PE Act. ‘Ballot boxes’ as defined in Sect 24 of the PE Act clearly refers to boxes that are used for the casting of ballot papers. They are boxes for which the presiding officer at a polling station must carryout specified actions in the presence of witnesses of the candidates at the polling station to ensure that there is no tampering of the ballot boxes before polling starts and after polling ends.
Clearly, based on this definition in the PE Act, the new boxes are not ballot boxes because they were not used to put in the ballot slips at the polling stations.  They are just boxes brought in to contain the counted votes. Why can’t they use back the same controlled ballot boxes? Why the need to change boxes?
This is not an issue of security of the votes and voting secrecy.
This discovery of the new boxes has pointed out a weakness in the process and procedure of our electoral system. Let us correct this, leave no doubt in the minds of the electorate, and move on. We must always protect the transparency and integrity of our electoral system. It is a fundamental pillar of our democratic society.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bukit Brown and Rochor: Development for Who?

Debate concerning the clearance of Bukit Brown Cemetery to make way for a new four-lane…

地铁内为“光谱行动”无声抗议 范国瀚遭罚款8千元或监禁32日

2017年6月,社运份子范国瀚为纪念光谱行动(Spectrum)30周年,与另八人在地铁上举行无声抗议。 他为此被当局指控抵触《公共秩序法》第16(1)项,以及其余两项控状:涉嫌抵触《破坏公物法》(Vandalism Act),以及在同年6月19日,因拒绝签署警方口供,被指抵触刑事法典第180项。 范国瀚在今日(15日)在国家法院为上述三项控状认罪,并遭判处合共8千元的罚款,或监禁32天。 第一项控状他面对4千500元罚款或监禁18日,第二项则罚款1千元或监禁四日;第三项罚款2千500元,或监禁10日。 范国瀚相信将对首两项控状,接受监禁惩处,第三项控状则缴交罚款。目前他仍有其余两项控状待当局考量。 他在2017年6月3日,除了在地铁车厢无声抗议,也在车厢屏窗上张贴两张写着“马克思主义阴谋?”,以及“为光谱行动生还者讨回公道”的纸张。 光谱行动为1987年5月21日一场秘密行动的代号,当时16人被指涉嫌参与推翻人民行动党政府阴谋,在未经审判下,以内安法令被逮捕。另外6人则在行动最后阶段被捕。

SDP’s Young Democrats celebrate Liberal Solidarity Week

Kirsten Han – The International Federation of Liberal Youth (IFLRY) website states…

可见度非常低 印尼烟霾情况堪忧

印尼加里曼岛林火肆虐,烟霾笼罩该国、马来西亚及新加坡,导致两国国民频频抱怨,要求印尼采取必要措施。 我国和马来西亚的空气污染指数都非常“糟糕”,就新加坡环境局官网指出,我国西部和南部的空气污染指数都超过了100点,迈入不健康水平中。相对的,马来西亚的空气污染指数也非常不健康,已有三个地区的空气污染指数超过200点了,东马的斯里阿曼甚至达到了416点。 然而,身为烟霾源头的加里曼丹,其空气污染指数可想而知,一定不会良好的。 今天在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff上,就有网民分享了一个据悉是加里曼丹烟霾情况的视频。 该仅两分钟的视频是由读者Yap所提供,据说已经在信息平台WhatsApp上流传了。视频中只见车辆停在路旁,可见度非常低,汽车和电单车骑士都停车不敢行驶,真的让人看得心惶惶。 视频间中有类似警车的讯号声音频频传来,电单车骑士也站在路中间帮忙指挥交通。不久后便看到白底红色条纹,类似救伤车的车辆经过,后面紧跟着两辆罗厘。 试想想,若当时没人在中间帮忙指挥,在可见度非常低的情况下,两车要发生车祸的几率将会高出很多。 有关的视频传出两小时后已经吸引了1万4000人观看,243人做出反应,77条评论以及189人转发。 署名Michael Kvm的网友则问到,马国已经开始进行人工造雨的工作了,“我们的政府做了什么?”