By Raksha Mahtani 
The ASEAN Youth Forum (AYF) made history on 11th May as the first regional youth forum to engage with ASEAN leaders in an interface meeting at the ASEAN Summit 2014 in host country Myanmar. It hoped to include youth civil society voices from all member countries.
However, only 3 of the 10 member countries approved the ASEAN Youth Forum elected delegates – Myanmar, Philippines and Indonesia. The remaining 7 countries rejected the submitted names of the AYF representatives, choosing instead to replace them with government-selected delegates.
The question remained – could the AYF still continue to be representative of the region’s youth interests without recognition from member countries?
The AYF, also known as the ASEAN Youth Movement, came together 2 years ago. Since its beginning, the AYF has been consulting youth civil society representatives from around the region in an annual Youth Forum. Representing Sayoni, I was honoured to witness their regional participation in 2014 as the Singapore representative at the ASEAN Youth Forum and speak with the official delegates.
The most recent meeting took place on 21 – 23 March 2014, hosted at Yangon University in Yangon, Myanmar. Its welcoming host, the Myanmar Youth Empowerment Programme, mobilised youth volunteers from the city and surrounding provinces.
Its leader, Thet Swe Win, managed to organise with limited resources a Myanmar youth consultation, elect national representatives, and host regional representatives at the March regional youth forum. Similarly, Indonesia and the Philippines also held national forums to select country representatives to the AYF.
The outcome document of the March meeting was the Yangon Declaration, or the ASEAN Youth Statement 2014, that summarised the AYF’s goals: the promotion of non-discrimination, equality, protection, sustainability and inclusive development for the ASEAN youth community.
The importance of the ASEAN Interface meeting – 30 minutes in length – presented a chance for the ASEAN Youth Forum to engage with regional leaders, present their interests on a regional platform and seek inclusion in the outcome document and action plan of the 2014 ASEAN Summit.
Cambodian AYF representative Chau Sophon stressed the importance of regional engagement. She said, “Cambodian youth issues on youth unemployment and migrant labour remain unheard on a national level. These are issues I want our official delegates to represent.”
Cambodia was among the 7 countries to send government-selected delegates to the ASEAN Summit. The rest included Malaysia, Singapore, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Brunei.
Determined to make full use of the Interface meeting despite these setbacks, the AYF engaged individually with the other official youth delegates in an open discussion. Without compromising the issues and language of the Yangon Declaration, the AYF delegates and the government appointed delegates came to a consensus to support the presentation of the Declaration at the Interface.
The Interface Summit took place Sunday, 11 May 2014, at 3pm, with Myanmar’s official delegate Phwe Yu Mon reading a summary of the Declaration.
The Declaration called for recognition of Southeast Asian youth voices. It took on an inclusive, rights-based focus in conjunction with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), both of which have been ratified by ASEAN member states.
More significantly, it called for youth participation in the Review of the Terms of Reference of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) to ensure representation of youth interests within a regional human rights authority. With this, AYF hopes to bring cases of region-wide human rights violations to AICHR’s attention.
It also called for affirmative action within ASEAN countries to address the needs and aspirations of youth in the Post-2015 Development agenda for the region.
Stressing the values of meaningful participation, transparency and accountability, the ASEAN Youth Forum aim to represent youth communities left marginalized and vulnerable by state laws and policies. Such communities include: youth with disabilities, youth migrant workers, indigenous youth, youth of diverse sexual orientation, gender identities, and gender expression, young people living in poverty and/or conflict, adolescent girls and youth living with HIV.
At an informal networking session with ASEAN leaders, Philippines’ official delegate Phillip Willard said that the experience at the ASEAN Summit was incredibly fruitful on both a regional and local level.
Speaking with the Philippines’ President Benigno Aquino III, Willard elaborated on a national educational programme called Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) that has already been put in place to help marginalised youth communities to afford and access education. He added, “The President also invited us to join the effort and follow up with them to ensure that implementation takes place.”
Official Singaporean delegate Foo Shih Shun from the Singapore Youth Council found the experience to be very fulfilling, especially to be included as a shadow to Singapore’s delegation to the ASEAN Summit. In an interview, he shared, “Throughout the process, we learnt a lot about the issues on the youth and children, especially those that come from a low income background. Education really allows them to rise up and break out of this poverty cycle.”
Indonesian delegate Moren Hutapea also had positive feedback from Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. He commended the AYF for their initiative and enthusiasm and encouraged them to develop their relationship further to work towards integrating youth issues into the national agenda.
The effects of the Interface are yet to be seen.
Attempting to engage with official delegates could easily have worked against the AYF – the process could have otherwise compromised their rights-based focus at the mercy of individual state interests.
Should they even be engaging with government-selected delegates then if independent youth civil society interests are to be fairly represented? As it stands, ASEAN operates on consensus-based principles. With varying degrees of openness to youth civil society engagement in member states, region-wide measures – however successful – would be difficult to implement.
Nevertheless, the success of the AYF lies in its continued effort to claim regional spaces and lobby government-selected delegates.
“The Summit gave us a chance to discuss with the Malaysian Government about the chairmanship of next year’s ASEAN Youth Forum,” Willard adds. Plans for engagement on the 2015 consultation meeting in Malaysia are already being formulated – and representation is high on the agenda.
The collective voice of ASEAN Youth is more than just an echo now – it has been heard. Time will tell if compromise will factor into the agenda too.
 
 Photo credit – The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, President Office

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

RFP put up for development of 5th desalination plant on Jurong Island

Singapore’s national water agency PUB has put up a Request for Proposal…

许通美“:行动党人格暗杀对手成选战败笔

尽管人民行动党在此次选举仍成功执政,横扫83席,不过巡回大使许通美教授也认为, 选民也传达了明确信息,要求政党拉高格调,注重解决议题而不是攻击政治对手。 许通美在《海峡时报》撰文表达看法,认为年轻选民给与行动党明确信息,而女性候选人亦表现出色。不过,行动党攻击对手的行为,似乎让选民们大皱眉头。 在选前,行动党陈有明曾借题发挥,挖出剧作家亚菲言过去言论,试图攻击工人党党魁毕丹星;接着该党盛港候选人辣玉莎被举报涉嫌发表族群言论。 不仅如此,连民主党秘书长徐顺全被指是“骗子”;至于该党主席淡马亚针对政府防疫政策发表的评论,亦同样被“泼马”(POFMA)。 许通美承认,工人党在盛港报捷绝对是此次选举大惊喜,也令人回想起行动党在2011年丢失阿裕尼集选区的情景。

明年起,修读部分时间课程大学生 可获更多补助

自2020年开始,修读部分时间课程学生的学生将可获得教育部补助金,让低收入学生获得更多援助。 昨日(17日),教育部发表文告,将增加新的助学金门槛,而符合资格的学生也会随着助学金而获得更多支援,继续缴付教育费用。 家庭月入不超过4000元的大学生将从原本的1350元提高到2500元,而低收入户的理工学院和国立幼教学院学生将从每年的600元增加至800元。 家庭月入介于4001元至6900元的大学生则可获1600元;专业文凭课程学生则可获得660元;再来,家庭月入介于6901元至9000元的学生助学金额则维持不变,大学生和专业文凭学生分别可获700元和300元。 政府每年都会为部分时间课程学生投资280万元,比目前的180万元更多,预计将会有2100名新加坡学生受益于补助金。 其中受益的学校包括新加坡国立大学(NUS)、南洋理工大学(NTU)、新跃社科大学(SUSS)、理工学院以及国家幼教学院(National Institute of Early Childhood Development)。 总理李显龙曾在今年8月国庆群众大会上宣布,从明年起调高大学生的助学金,而政府表示预计此举将会为新加坡学生提供更大的支持,协助他们能够完成学业。

杨南强:疫情下曝露新加坡结构性缺失 冀改善医疗体系提升社会保障

新加坡政府投资公司前首席经济师杨南强认为,在当前的冠状病毒19疫情下,也曝露了新加坡在贫富不均和社会保障上的结构弱点。 他在今日(16日)在脸书发文点评,其中三大结构性弱点,包括常规的收入支援不足,以及绝对贫穷群体的公共住房需求。 就业入息补助计划(Workfare Income Supplement)和乐龄补贴计划的补贴仍少得可怜,这致使他们在阻断措施下面对更大的困难。再者过于拥挤的租赁组屋也存在着风险。 其二,杨南强也提及近期感染人数激增的客工宿舍感染群,他们居住在欠佳的环境,也担忧会造成人道主义灾难,以及让我们的医疗系统不堪重负。 再者,当前疫情也揭示我国对医院的投资不足之处,我们每一千人口才拥有2.5个病床,但在其他经合组织(OECD)成员的平均比例是4.7,如日本的比例就高达每千人有13.1病床;南韩12.3、台湾6.9以及香港5.4个病床。 他认为,这也致使让我国医院系统面对可能不堪负荷的风险。 但他仍希望政府能藉此机会重新反思,加强对于绝对贫穷群体的辅助和社会保障,提供贫困家庭和外籍客工更体面的居所,同时提升医疗体系。