By Yasmeen Banu
In January 2013, Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced it would construct a new MRT line- the Cross Island MRT Line (CRL). This new line is currently under planning and evaluation, targeted for completion in 2030.
The CRL line is essentially a line that will serve as a key transfer line, cutting through the island. This new line will start from Changi, and will pass through Loyang, Pasir Ris, Hougang, Ang Mo Kio, before reaching Sin Ming. It will continue to the west, towards areas such as Bukit Timah, Clementi, West Coast and will terminate at Jurong Industrial Estate.

alternative_routes1
CRL route and alternative route proposed by the Nature Society
Stated on LTA’s website on the benefit of the CRL Line:

It will provide commuters with another alternative for East-West travel to the current East-West Line, bringing greater comfort and significantly shorter journey times. The eastern leg of the CRL will also include a segment that extends into the centre of Punggol. Residents in Punggol will be able to travel to Pasir Ris – a popular and much demanded travel route – in only 10-15 minutes, compared to a 40 minute bus journey today.”

However, construction of this line would mean cutting through part of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve and MacRitchie Reservoir. This has remained a concern with Nature Society Singapore and many eco-activists.
One such eco-activist, Teresa Guttensohn, has raised worries about our last remaining natural heritage and the impact the line would make on the rainforest. In an interview with Ms Guttensohn, she said,

“Major concerns (that will affect our natural reserve), are further fragmentation of the forest reserve, possible loss of habitats and endangered communities, soil erosion and stream stiltation.”

In June 2013, Ms Guttensohn was at Hong Lim Park’s Speaker’s Corner demonstrating a protest performance by being tied to a tree, for 24 hours from 3pm on the 22nd of June to the 23rd of June. The protest performance was to call for urgent action on the issue of planning the CRL line to run underneath the Central Catchment Nature Reserve.
Ms Guttensohn performed a poem “Chained To Our Roots”, and made a speech – “Paying Extreme Price for Cross Island MRT; A Faster Ride To Species Extinction”.
She also wrote a letter of appeal to the Minister of Transport. Ms Guttensohn’s friend, Dr Vilma D’Rozario, who also demonstrated a protest performance together with Ms Guttensohn, wrote a letter to the Strait’s Times Forum with regards to the CRL line.
In July last year, the Nature Society released a position paper that states the soil investigation activities involving the core drilling of 70 metres deep bore holes along the alignment will cause tremendous permanent damage to the habitat. The society has since made recommendations to LTA for them to adopt alternative routes for to have the MRT line rerouted so to avoid cutting through the reserve. (Read the society’s position paper here)
While the alignment controversy has been brought to the attention of LTA, LTA insists that the line has not been finalized yet as “the Government has worked with nature and environmental groups to finalise the scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the portion of the CRL around the Central Catchment Nature Reserve”.
The EIA report that is targeted for completion in 2016, “will assist the Government in making a considered decision on the CRL alignment”.
When asked should the EIA be shown to be detrimental to nature, if the agency would adopt the recommendation to reroute, LTA has not made any respond to the enquiry. Similarly, LTA has not responded when asked if the data of the environmental study be made public to view, since the data of the environmental study for Bukit Brown Cemetery was not made public.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore still ranked 151 out of 180 in World Press Freedom Index and it’s not surprising why

Once again, Singapore was ranked 151 out 180 in the World Press…

Humanitarian doctor and Singapore exile, Dr Ang Swee Chai wins Mulan’s Award

By Tan Wah Piow Once again, the charitable work of Dr Ang…

India’s Finance Minister praises RBI in allowing DBS to rescue failed Chennai bank

In an interview with Bloomberg on Tues (8 Dec), India’s Finance Minister…

淡马亚:由政府判断假消息不合理

民主党主席淡马亚医生接受本社专访,针对政府力推的《防止网络假消息与网络操纵法》发表观点,认为由政府判断假消息并不合理,且可能产生寒蝉效应,人们会害怕如果举报一些弊端,会被标签为“假新闻”,反而让自己惹官司。 “政府一再保证,法庭仍会是最终的仲裁者。但就拿我们向法庭申请马西岭-油池集选区补选为例,首先就要拿出两万元的抵押金。普通老百姓有那么多闲钱陪你这么玩吗?” 他直言,虽然法律援助基金获得许多人捐助,但是要真正落实以法律援助上诉政府裁定,却很有挑战性,再者申请法援也有一定条件。 未听闻有人能获法援挑战政府 淡马亚笑说,从未听过有人可以申请法援来挑战政府,“如果政府真有诚意,那么因为脸书贴文被判刑而上诉的范国瀚和陈两裕,都应该获得法援!” 他认为,如果要营造一个多元的新加坡,不可能要求每个人都只奉行同一种思路。 他坦言,政府机构固然有“吹哨者保护法令”,但是基层对于告密人是否有获得保障仍有疑虑,例如在一些论坛,一些人表示仍害怕若在武装部队中揭露一些事情会被“关注”。 政府和官媒也曾涉散播假消息 在去年的蓄意散播假消息听证会上,民主党也提出即便是政府和主流媒体,也不是完全没犯下散播假新闻的失误。 淡马亚举例,在武吉巴督补选时,《联合晚报》引述了一段徐顺全从未说过的话来做标题。虽然报章事后已修改标题,遗憾的是这段话也被李显龙总理引述。 还有1987年的“马克思主义阴谋论”,直到今天都还有人质疑,包括两位行动党的部长。但是政府还坚信,当年那个导致多名社运分子和公民被拘留的论述。 德国政府需交法院裁决…