November 14, 2013, Singapore – The Singapore Anti-death Penalty Campaign and We Believe In Second Chances welcome today’s decision by Justice Choo Han Teck to spare former drug mule Yong Vui Kong from the gallows. It has always been our position that Yong, a young, first-time offender, deserves a second chance. We are relieved he will not have to pay the ultimate price for his mistake. However his punishment remains a heavy one – Yong will now have to serve a life sentence and receive 15 strokes of the cane.

Today’s verdict was possible because of recent changes to Singapore’s death penalty regime. While we are glad that the amendments have given judges a restricted amount of discretion where they used to have none, we would also like to echo Justice Choo who on October 25, 2013, pointed out that the new law might be problematic in providing defendants a fair process in meeting requirements that need to be fulfilled, before they are eligible for a re-sentencing hearing.

Under the amendments, the death penalty is no longer mandatory for those convicted in drug trafficking cases if the accused is no more than a courier and if the prosecution certifies that he or she rendered substantial assistance to the Central Narcotics Bureau.

The Court only determines whether the two requirements are met after the accused person is convicted.  However, as Justice Choo noted, if evidence relating to whether the accused was a courier is introduced after he is convicted, there is a possibility that this could contradict the court’s original findings or even cast doubts on the accused’s guilt.

Disallowing this evidence on the other hand, might prejudice the accused, making it impossible for him to prove he was just a courier.  Justice Choo suggested that an alternative would be to make it a rule that evidence be produced at trial. However, this puts the accused in a tough position – in order to make the claim that he was just a courier, he must first admit he was trafficking drugs.

Either way, the accused person may potentially be disadvantaged in being able to discharge the burden of showing that the requirements have been met. This is unacceptable, especially since the punishment is mandatory death. We note that this problem would not persist should full discretion be given to judges to decide on the punishment, and we reiterate our calls for this to be so.

We also question whether the caning of those who have already received a life sentence, is necessary. As Yong’s lawyer, M Ravi, pointed out in Court today, his client is “a pale shadow of the person he was four years ago. He has little fat. He is weak and frail.”   Given Yong’s poor health, we hope that the Prison or the Courts will be extra vigilant in meting out any punishment to him. Moreover, it is important to note that only 33 jurisdictions around the world allow the caning of convicted offenders. Most civilised countries consider the punishment to be a barbaric one.

Furthermore, we would like to point out that the deterrent effect of the death penalty over alternative forms of punishment is unproven. Furthermore, the penalty is an irreversible punishment at the end of a process, which is subject to the fallibilities of humans. We may be able to release innocent persons from prison, but we cannot reverse their executions.

Finally, we join Yong’s family in expressing our deepest gratitude to his lawyer, M Ravi, for working so tirelessly and selflessly for his client these past four years. We know it has not been an easy journey and we are glad he never gave up.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Newsbites – CHC still in hot seat, industry do their bit, gambling gets another halter

City Harvest Church leaders still not in the clear The Court has…

Lta seeks public's input on color scheme for public buses under new BCM

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) is asking for members of the public…

印尼强调“零确诊” 驻印外交界却对检测成效感疑虑

印度尼西亚政府在疫情爆发以来,一直号称“零确诊”病例。 截至周三(26日),印度尼西亚有132例经检测后,均未呈阳性。 本周传出,中爪哇省的三宝珑的某家医院,与巴淡岛均传出有病患疑因感染武汉冠状病毒死亡,但当局回应,两名病人的检测结果均呈阴性。 该名三宝珑医院的死者为37印尼籍患者,其死亡原因为支气管肺炎,而另名死者则为新加坡籍61岁男子,曾于本月20日前往一家私立医院急诊室,其症状也和病毒相似,但当局则表示他并非死于武汉冠病,而是另一种疾病。 印尼当局称,两者都经过检测并呈现阴性结果。 虽强调“零确诊”,外交界却对此产生疑虑 然而,雅加达的外交界与公共卫生专家对于印尼的检测效果产生疑虑。 该国迄今未出现确诊病例,《澳洲媒体雪梨晨驱报》(Sydney Morning Herald)昨天(26日)报导,在雅加达外交界流传一份资料,指美国驻印度尼西亚官员曾向印度尼西亚政府高层官员表达关切。 美国、澳洲、加拿大驻印度尼西亚官员之间也曾讨论过此事。 报道也指出,该份文件指“我们认为贵国政府,应在侦测病毒上采取更积极的态度”,并指示外交官们应提供相应的关键信息。…

MOM: Stop-work Order issued over Braddell Road flyover project due to safety lapses

Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has issued a stop-work order (SWO) against Singapore…