TOC Editorial

As you read this article in front of your computer, there are hundreds of construction workers around the island working on Government and private construction projects in the stifling haze.

Even as our Government rails against the corporate interests in Sumatra who are willing to sacrifice human health for profits, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) still isn’t practicing what they preach by allowing construction companies in Singapore to make their workers slog through the smog.

On 17 June 2013, the Manpower Ministry put out a tough sounding press release, stating that stop-work orders could be issued if the haze situation deteriorated.

Around 10 p.m. on 19 June, TOC sounded the alert as the PSI shot past the “hazardous” range, calling on our Manpower Ministry to issue a stop-work order for construction workers doing the 8 p.m. – 8 a.m. shift.

More than 24 hours has since passed, and the PSI has hit the “hazardous” range several hours in a row. For most part, it has stayed in the range of “very unhealthy”. No stop-work orders have been issued.

No stop-work orders have been issued despite first hand evidence that the risk mitigating guidelines set out in MOM’s press release are being flouted.

In reality, wearing an N95 mask to operate heavy machinery and lift heavy loads is extremely dangerous and not very practical.

Some are calling for a “wait-and-see” approach before taking action that would affect entire industries.

This is dangerously misguided.

How is it conscionable to advocate a “wait-and-see” approach to see if any workers are maimed or injured?

The correct approach should always be to err on the side of safety.

A practical way forward

The Government needs to call a general stop-work order for outdoor manual labourers for a stipulated period of time.

In that window, it should devise, vet and implement a reduced worker capacity plan with private companies.

Those who think the Government has no business telling private companies what to do are completely wrong.

The Workplace Safety and Heath Act makes it a punishable offence for an employer to make his employee work in unsafe conditions. Safe workplaces ARE the State’s business: that’s the entire reason there is a whole act of Parliament devoted to the issue.

Further, the Government is in prime position to lead by example especially for Government construction projects like the Downtown line and in the Town Councils they run.

If we want to send the message to our Indonesian counterparts that people come before profits, we need to walk the talk here in Singapore.

You May Also Like

收“压惊红包“视为贿赂,31人遭贪污调查局严厉警告

日前万礼火化场有员工被指收“压惊红包”,触犯《防止贪污法令》,遭贪污调查局调查。昨日(19日)贪污调查局表示经调查,判处员工们获严厉警告(stern warning)。 贪污局续指,去年10月,接获环境局举报,指该火化场出现收取“压惊红包”贪污行为,涉及17名在火化场工作的环境局职员,与14名殡葬业者。 其中17名环境局职员,被指从殡葬董事与灵车司机受贿,换取火化程序更顺利,因而获得得严厉警告。由此,亦违反了《公务员指导手册》,需接受部门纪律处分。 另14名殡葬业者中,其中两人则涉及教唆行为,以红包形式贿赂,违反了《预防腐败法》,获严厉警告;12名则以红包形式贿赂环境局职员,而获得严厉警告。 尽管两名环境局资深长官没有实行受贿行为,但也因两人知情不报,故将面对环境局的纪律行动。 据《海峡时报》报导,这些雇员之所以仅收到警告,不被起诉,其因缺乏有力证据证明他们严重失职,或对不向他们支付“红包“的家庭有不利的行为。 一旦经起诉定罪,他们将可能面临最高五年监禁,或罚款10万新元,或两者兼施。 贪污调查局于文内强调,任何投诉与举报将会被严正以待,无论是何种受贿性质与价值,将经侦查确定是否构成受贿罪行,即指赠送与接受礼品并不构成受贿罪,但其行为意图是为了换取利益,将被视为受贿。 收取一元也可被视为是受贿 去年12月,两名Cogent Container…

Open Letter on MM’s health

The following is a letter written by a member of the public…

选区范围检讨委员会8月1日成立

工人党秘书长暨阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,在国会质询总理,究竟选区范围检讨委员会是在八月的什么时候成立? 选举局在9月4日,在官网发布文告,宣布总理已召开成立选区范围检讨委会。但是并没有道明确切的成立日期。 贸工部长陈振声则在昨日代总理李显龙,以书面方式回答毕丹星提问,指上述委会是在8月1日成立。 今年7月,毕丹星曾询问有关委会是否已成立, 惟陈振声当时也代表总理答复,尚未。 今年3月1日,毕丹星曾质问,为何不在上述委会成立后政府自行作出宣布,但陈振声则代总理回答,惯例是让委会专业地进行工作,不受不必要媒体关注或公共压力影响。 事实上,此前在野政治人物张媛容也认为,新加坡人有权通过自由和公平选举,选出人民领导,这也意味着,鉴于群众利益,选区范围检讨委员会什么时候成立,也应立即公告国民。 “在2015年选举前夕,当总理在7月13日在国会受到提问时,才透露选区范围检讨委会已成立,但委会早已成立了两个月。” 在2006年和2011年,选区范围检讨委会用了四个月时间提交报告。但在2015年,从委会公布新的选区地图,到9月1日的提名日,只有39天。 目前,由总理秘书陈基荣担任选区范围检讨委会主席。选举局局长许松岭担任委员会秘书,其他委员包括:建屋发展局局长蔡君炫博士、新加坡土地管理局局长陈文凯和统计局局长王辉锦。

灌输焦虑和恐惧 梁文辉吁打造更强大公民,而不是更强大的政府

取自前进党助理秘书长梁文辉个人专页: 总理在昨日(7日)晚间7点半的讲话,听起来像是在要求人民给予政府更大的授权。新加坡前进党坚信,以我们自独立以来多年积累下来的实力,新加坡将最终能克服冠状危机。 但是鉴于迄今为止政府应对冠状危机的表现不佳,能够多快控制局面,度过难关是一个疑问。 这场危机与我们过去经历的任何危机都不一样,因为它不仅需要财政资源来支持经济,而且还需要新加坡人调整其生活方式和转变其经济模式。不幸的是,我们的政府在这两个方面都表现不好。除了灌输焦虑和恐惧之外,政府从不帮助新加坡人制定长期财务计划和在工作与生活之间取得平衡。它还在研发和培育能力上花费了数十亿美元,但仍然无法转变经济。 在我们进入了危机时,其实我们已经历了二十年的经济管理失误,新加坡人的生活因失去PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员与技师)工作,新毕业生的工作和技能不匹配,持续高昂的租金和其他生活成本而变得非常紧张。尤其是低收入的新加坡人,在危机袭来时因为积蓄很少,更本没有危机应付能力。在这种情况下,政府近1000亿美元救助资金在时间和数量上是远远不够的。 我们需要采取更果断的行动,以建立更强大的公民和经济。政府过去的经济政策以及过去几个月对冠状危机的处理表现证明,政府需要帮助,才能寻得更好的解决方案来克服未来十年的挑战。 加强政府的授权将无济于事,因为它在过去的60年中在国会中一直占有超级大多数。 让一个由人民行动党领导和相当人数的非行动党议员组成的国家振兴政府 (National Resurgence Government, NRG)将是一个更好的选择。理由如下:…