• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

MND responds to Workers’ Party

by Terry Xu
15/05/2013
in Commentaries, Letters, Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0

By Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “MND explains computing method for MA rate for town councils” (Channel NewsAsia, May 14) in  response to the Workers’ Party’s media release of 14 May – “AHPETC / WP’s RESPONSE TO COMPARISONS ON MANAGING AGENT RATES”.

Did Ministry of National Development (MND) calculate using all residential and commercial units?

It states that “The National Development Ministry said it computes the Managing Agent (MA) rate per unit for each town council by dividing the MA tender rate that the town council submits to HDB by the total number of residential and commercial units the town council manages and covered by the MA contract.

The town councils collect Service and Conservancy Charges from both residential and commercial properties.

The ministry said this is the method it has always used, and applied consistently to all town councils.

Aljunied Hougang Punggol Town Council (AHPTC) calculate using residential units only?

The ministry added it notes that the numbers provided by Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council only covered residential units and excluded the commercial units and this provides an incomplete picture.

“Complete picture” may look even better for AHPTC?

I am rather puzzled by the above, because if AHPTC uses the MND’s method of “dividing the MA tender rate by the total number of residential and commercial units”, instead of “by only the residential units” as AHPTC had done – wouldn’t the AHPTC MA rate per unit be even lower?

If this is correct, wouldn’t it make AHPTC’s rebuttal even stronger and better?

If so, what is the MND trying to say in its “this provides an incomplete picture”?

In other words, the “incomplete picture” may actually make AHPTC look worse than the “complete picture”?

Why not just do the calculation?

Actually, for the sake of clarity and to avoid any further confusion, the MND could just simply have calculated the “complete picture” and included it in its statement, instead of merely saying “this provides an incomplete picture”.

Comparison with Tampines?

As to “As a comparison, the ministry referred to Tampines Town Council as it was closest in size to Aljunied-Hougang Town Council, with the number of units managed at about 57,000.

EM Services was the Managing Agent for Tampines.

In FY2010, it charged a monthly rate of $5.14 per property unit.

In FY2011, it charged $5.15 per property unit..

WP’s rebuttal

In August 2012, an open tender was called, and CPG Facilities Management won the bid to provide MA services to Tampines Town Council, at a monthly rate of $4.99 per property unit” – Let’s look at what the Workers’ Party said in this regard – “According to the Minister, Tampines TC’s MA rate for 2012 is $4.99 per property unit.

MA change, rate drop?

We understand that there was a change in MA from 2011 to 2012, meaning that it was the first year in Tampines for the incumbent MA, CPG.  Coincidentally, CPG was incumbent in Aljunied TC until 2011, and its unit rate tendered in FY 2010 for Aljunied had been $6.51 (according to the government’s tables).

We do not wish to speculate why a MA would tender in 2012 at a lower rate for MA services than in 2010, given the rising costs.  However, we note that as early as at 2007, another MA, EM Services, had tendered at $5.75 per residential unit for Pasir Ris-Punggol Town.

Table 3 – Tampines TC’s MA rate

Managing Agent FY 2007 FY 2010 FY 2012
EM Services – PRPG $5.75 – –
CPG – ATC – $6.51 –
CPG – Tampines TC – – $4.99

“Selective” comparison?

We can only surmise that the Tampines TC’s MA rate of $4.99 in 2012 which was chosen for comparison was an outlier”.

Figures appear to be different?

So, Singaporeans are perhaps even more confused now because if you look at the MND’s and the WP’s media statements (and of course as well as what the Minister said in the Parliamentary debate) – both parties’ MA rates for both AHTC and Tampines appear to be different.

More detailed data please?

I would like to suggest that they both come up with more detailed calculations to show Singaporeans how each side’s figures were derived – such as what was the total tender sum, number of residential and commercial units, etc – rather than just talking – like in a war of “words” without more detailed “numbers”.

Let’s have a  more complete comparison?

The MND should also give the numbers for all the 14 town councils, instead of just Tampines.

Comparison was an outlier?

Saying “As a comparison, the ministry referred to Tampines Town Council as it was closest in size to Aljunied-Hougang Town Council, with the number of units managed at about 57,000″ – may have opened its “comparison” to what I believe the WP may be hinting at, in its statement that it may be an unfair selective comparison –

(WP’s words – “We do not wish to speculate why a MA would tender in 2012 at a lower rate for MA services than in 2010, given the rising costs.

We can only surmise that the Tampines TC’s MA rate of $4.99 in 2012 which was chosen for comparison was an outlier”).

Some questions for the sake of clarity?

In this connection, does Tampines have the lowest MA rate amongst the town councils?

Any other town council had a decrease in its MA rate by 3 per cent or more like Tampines, compared to the rates in FY2011 and FY2010?

What is the range in the variation of MA rates for all the town councils, relative to Tampines?

How does AHPTC’s rates compare to all the other town councils?

Why did Tampines increase S & CC?

Finally, if Tampines happens to have the lowest rate which also decreased – whereas the others increased over the last 2 years (I am just speculating for the purpose of using an example now, as I have no way of telling without the data) – then why did Tampines town council increase its S & CC last year, when it had an operating surplus of $3.51 million in the financial year 2010/2011, surplus for the financial year of $6.9 million and an accumulated surplus of $8.4 million?

AHPTC reduced S & CC

Also, by the way, AHPTC reduced its S & CC after it took over the town council, following the last elections.

So, what do we seem to have here – at least from the perspective of residents – a much lower MA rate like in Tampines means an increase in the S & CC – and  a much higher (which is the subject of contention now) MA rate in AHPTC means a decrease in the S & CC?

 

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.

Related Posts

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud
Business

Market ignores Adani’s 413-paged rebuttal against Hindenburg’s allegation and continues the sell-off

01/02/2023
Driver dies after vehicle fell into sea at Keppel Terminal
Singapore

Driver dies after vehicle fell into sea at Keppel Terminal

01/02/2023
One pilot dead after Vietnamese military fighter jet crash
AFP

One pilot dead after Vietnamese military fighter jet crash

31/01/2023
Japan and NATO pledge ‘firm’ response to China, Russia threats
AFP

Japan and NATO pledge ‘firm’ response to China, Russia threats

31/01/2023
Japanese junior high school sprinter breaks another record in prefectural race
Japan

Japanese junior high school sprinter breaks another record in prefectural race

31/01/2023
Malaysia PM stressed the need for people to be allowed to effectively and actively participate in civil society
Malaysia

Malaysia PM stressed the need for people to be allowed to effectively and actively participate in civil society

31/01/2023

Latest posts

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

Market ignores Adani’s 413-paged rebuttal against Hindenburg’s allegation and continues the sell-off

01/02/2023
Driver dies after vehicle fell into sea at Keppel Terminal

Driver dies after vehicle fell into sea at Keppel Terminal

01/02/2023
One pilot dead after Vietnamese military fighter jet crash

One pilot dead after Vietnamese military fighter jet crash

31/01/2023
Japan and NATO pledge ‘firm’ response to China, Russia threats

Japan and NATO pledge ‘firm’ response to China, Russia threats

31/01/2023
Japanese junior high school sprinter breaks another record in prefectural race

Japanese junior high school sprinter breaks another record in prefectural race

31/01/2023
Malaysia PM stressed the need for people to be allowed to effectively and actively participate in civil society

Malaysia PM stressed the need for people to be allowed to effectively and actively participate in civil society

31/01/2023
Million-dollar overpayments made by various ministries, public agencies highlighted in sampled audit by Auditor-General Office amongst various lapses

Singapore ranked least corrupt country in Asia, fifth in the world

31/01/2023
China angered by new Czech president’s Taiwan call

China angered by new Czech president’s Taiwan call

31/01/2023

Trending posts

Former Singaporean shares change of life in Australia with annual pay of S$80,000 as a plumber

Former Singaporean shares change of life in Australia with annual pay of S$80,000 as a plumber

by Yee Loon
30/01/2023
19

...

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
41

...

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

by Yee Loon
26/01/2023
24

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
66

...

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

by The Online Citizen
26/01/2023
58

...

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
28

...

May 2013
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Apr   Jun »

The Online Citizen is a regional online publication based in Taiwan and formerly Singapore’s longest-running independent online media platform.

Navigation

  • Editorial
  • Commentaries
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Community

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Letter submission
  • Membership subscription

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 - 2023 The Online Citizen Asia

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2022 - 2023 The Online Citizen Asia