By Ghui

According to news reports, a freelance filmmaker spent close to eight hours at the Singapore police headquarters in connection with her recent interviews with two ex-SMRT bus drivers from China (http://sg.news.yahoo.com/s-pore-film-maker-assists-with-investigation-into-police-brutality-173326960.html). 
 Her iMac, mobile phone and laptop were also similarly seized.

I question the relevance of this search. Lynn Lee is a journalist and a documentary maker. It is her job to conduct interviews with individuals who the public will be interested in. The bus drivers were embroiled in the recent transportation furore and have alleged that the police assaulted them. Given that these men have generated much controversy, which involves two public departments – the transportation services and the police, Singaporeans are naturally curious. (http://ride.asiaone.com/news/transport/story/former-smrt-drivers-allege-police-assault) Added to that very understandable inquisitiveness is the right of all Singaporeans to hear both sides of the story.

Lee’s desire to speak with the bus drivers to get their version of events is therefore in line with her profession and public interest. All the efforts and time spent on seemingly investigating her appears to me to be a waste of police time and public resources. If the police are trying to investigate the allegations of assault, shouldn’t they be speaking to the persons involved directly? I.e. the police officers implicated and the bus drivers themselves! Why question a third party journalist who was not at the “scene of the crime”?

Perhaps the police merely wanted to ascertain that the bus drivers did make these allegations in her presence and wanted to take her statement. But surely, that would not take 8 hours? Besides, why confiscate her mobile phone?

This is not the first time the police have apparently been overzealous. In 2005, they quizzed filmmaker Martyn See on his film about opposition politician, Dr. Chee Soon Juan. They even ordered for his tapes and video camera to be surrendered! (link) Again, what was the point of going after a filmmaker who was just trying to make a documentary on an individual who Singaporeans are intrigued by? Surely, Singaporeans are entitled to hear Dr. Chee’s side of the story?

As a Singaporean, I wonder if the police force (funded by taxpayers) should be spending our resources on these rather pointless exercises?

Surely, the police have better things to do?

You May Also Like

Marsiling-Yew Tee Town Council explains that it did not file police report against single mother for unpaid S&CC bills

On Tuesday (21 January), the Marsiling-Yew Tee Town Council elucidated that it…

Online users fume in anger after 65-year-old cyclist left in coma following an accident with e-scooter

On Saturday (21 September), a 65-year-old woman was knocked down after her…

向医护人员吐痰 62岁男子入狱九周罚1400元

频频因为对他人吐痰的男子,再次因为向医院和福利院等地区的医护人员吐痰,而被判监禁九个星期,罚款1400元。 62岁的Choo Bee Choon所犯下的罪行包括: 对着正在行人道交界处控制交通的辅警吐痰; 对新加坡综合医院(SGH)的看护助理吐痰,甚至因拒绝离开而躺在医院的地板上大闹; 对新加坡综合医院的男护士吐痰,还挥拳打对方的脸颊; 对德教安善福利院(Angsana Home)的一名医生和护士吐痰。 被告被控造成他人伤害、武力并对公务员使用武力对待的罪行,被判入狱九个星期,被罚款1400元,他还有另外五项控状尚在考量中。 他自今年2月出狱后,就开始触犯有关罪行,一直到他3月再次被逮捕为止。 因感到不满而吐口水…

Australia offers another A$5m aid for boat refugee crisis

Australia has offered another A$5 million in humanitarian aid to potential illegal…