Photo credit: Singapore Democratic Party’s Facebook page
So, the main democratic right (to participate in politics) is a fundamental constitutional right of the people of Singapore. And no one should be deprived of their right and held to ransom to extort statements of contrition of repentance and contrition” – Dr Lim Hock Siew,
If anyone was entitled to be bitter, it was Dr Lim Hock Siew.
Detained as communist under Operation Cold Store in 1963 when Singapore was still a self-governing state under British rule, Dr Lim was only released 19 years later into a vastly transformed, independent Singapore.
Dr Lim was originally detained in 1963 on the advice of the Internal Security Council, which comprised representatives from the British Colonial, Malaysian Federal and Singapore governments.
But his continued detention in independent Singapore was continued largely at the behest of the Prime Minister of an independent Singapore.
In the early days

Dr Lim grew up in a poor neighbourhood near the Kadang Kerbau Maternity Hospital. His life-long commitment to socialism emanated from his awareness of the problems and difficulties faced by the poor, supplemented by the theoretical knowledge he gained from books.

At university, he was a committed founder-member of the University Socialist Club. He was also a member of the then left-wing People’s Action Party (PAP) from its inception, and campaigned in the 1955 and 1959 elections.

His reputation as a medical doctor preceded him – not only did his clinic dispense free medicine for the needy and the real indigent, he also gave them transport money to go home, as Dr Wong Wee Nam recollected in an article for TOC. Dr Lim believed that, from a societal perspective, the most common cause of anemia was not iron deficiency but poverty.

When the PAP expelled 13 dissident MPs who refused to support its Malaysia scheme in July 1961, Dr Lim resigned as a government doctor and joined the newly-formed Barisan Sosialis, which he regarded as the only meaningful party that could carry its anti-colonial struggle one step forward. He had a major role in formulating the party’s position and debated against the PAP’s terms for merger with Malaya.

Deep convictions

As he put it in his oral history recorded by the National Archives: ‘It was my deep conviction in the Barisan’s position on the issue that in great measure helped me withstand the torments and efforts to destroy my morale in the long years of imprisonment from February 1963. My stand and that of the Barisan has been vindicated by historical events.’

In prison, Dr Lim rejected every opportunity offered to him to sign statements which would have gained him release, but which he felt was false and politically motivated. He refused to do anything which could be used to justify his detention.

About 9 years into his detention, he was asked to sign a statement committing to support the democratic system in Singapore, and to not participate in politics. 

He refused, pointing out that the two demands were contradictory: if the first was true, then there would be no reason for him to be deprived of his right to the second.

He said, at a book launch on 14 November 2009:

“So, the main democratic right (to participate in politics) is a fundamental constitutional right of the people of Singapore. And no one should be deprived of their right and held to ransom to extort statements of contrition of repentance and contrition”

With no bitterness

Remarkably, Dr Lim held little bitterness towards life in general, or hatred for those who incarcerated him.

But that’s not to say he ever stopped fighting for what he believed in.

Dr Lim had, throughout his life and even towards its twilight, called for the abolition of the Internal Security Act (ISA).

Together with 15 former ISA detainees, he issued two joint statements in September 2011 calling for the abolition of the Act and the setting up of an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate the allegations made against ISA detainees. The statements urged the government “to have the moral and political courage to set up such a commission in the interest of truth and transparency.” By this time, Dr Lim would have been 80 years old.

The world celebrates men like Nelson Mandela, political prisoners who bore their crosses with equanimity and grace.

But less will celebrate the passing of Dr Lim Hock Siew, an understated medical doctor from Kadang Kerbau who held firm to the principles of social justice and equality until the very end.

This is due in no small part to the State’s attempt to muzzle his voice until as late as 2009, when it banned a factual video of him speaking in public, without ever alleging that the speech itself was unlawful.

But Dr Lim’s life holds lessons that, in the end, have the potential to transcend the political shackles with which his oppressors had sought to restrain him: a life of beliefs held close and lived fiercely, a life lived with sacrifice and compassion, and an end without bitterness or regret.

Would his oppressors be able to say the same when their day comes?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

盛港公寓工地惊现两枚手榴弹与314颗弹药!警方连夜就地引爆

盛港公寓工地日前竟挖出两枚手榴弹和314颗子弹! 据警方指出,当局于本月9日早上9点15分接获通知,称有工人在盛港中路(Sengkang Central)10号的工地内进行挖掘工程时,发现两枚手榴弹和314颗轻型武器弹药。 警方派出军火拆爆组,一脸两日(10日和11日)在工地作业,引爆这些炸弹。警方也表示,新加坡武装部队军火拆爆组于昨日凌晨1点左右,所有的手榴弹与弹药都已成功就地引爆。 回溯去年11月,警方接获投报指在若锦街一建筑工地发现一枚二战时期的空投弹,基于转移不安全,必须在现场引爆。 当时,附近200米的酒店和公寓居民也已被疏散,并劝请其他民众切勿靠近上述地点,且不准放无人机进行航拍。

More transparency! Great!

This article is filed under the new column, Letters to TOC.  …

职总企业并购KOPITIAM:关乎竞争垄断与公共利益透明化?

最近媒体报导,职总创优企业合作社收购本地咖啡店和小贩中心运营商KOPITIAM集团,但是实际并购价格至今未公开。 据报导,KOPITIAM集团在全岛有80分行,预计并购交易将在年底完成。 并购若成功,将造就全国最大规模的餐饮中心巨头– 这似乎正走向一个竞争减少、约趋垄断的市场局面? 新加坡竞争与消费委员会的官网,对并购垄断的观点是这样的: ”竞争与消费委员会,透过推演并购、假设不并购可能出现的市场后果,来评估并购造成的影响,以及是否出现竞争减少到状态。“ 但我们想想,职总企业并购KOPITIAM,是否与不久前发生的私召车服务公司GRAB并购优步,有相似之处? 职总企业声明:并购符合职总社企的社会使命,确保提供民众可负担的熟食服务(9月21日报导)。可是据《网络公民》早前揭发,有小贩中心业者缴付近1千600租金之余,还要承担逾2千元的杂费。职总不应对外公布,此次并购究竟花了多少钱? 并购涉及公共利益 并购一事涉及公共利益,诚如研究蓄意散播假消息特委会的建议,如果涉公共利益事项选择不公开,政府(当中有许多工运议员)似乎有必要给个说法。 知名美食家司徒国辉在美食指南部落客”食尊“(Makansutra)揭露社会企业管理的小贩中心,却实行最为商业化的餐饮业管理模式。小贩除了租金还要缴交各种杂费,平均每月支出4千元,比新加坡知名麦士威小贩中心最高标价者,平均2-3千元的每月指出还要高。 司徒国辉也指出,职总富食客向摊位征收每月1千608元的租金,比起环境局管理的小贩中心平均1千514元的租金,稍微高些。…