~ By Cheong Yaoming ~

In February 2012, the National Solidarity Party (NSP) launched its own Legal Clinic, to provide free legal consultation by qualified volunteer lawyers to Singaporeans who cannot afford to see a lawyer. Five months on, this community service has blossomed and saw it biggest turnout yet in its latest session held on 4 June 2012.

 

 

 

At the NSP headquarters, the conference room was used as a waiting area and pre-interview venue. Volunteers talked to those who were seeking help and summarised the information for the volunteer lawyers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On that night the both rooms and a makeshift consulting area, a table with two chairs in the middle of the hallway, were used. Despite the spartan set-up, operations ran smoothly and efficiently. More importantly, everyone who turned up for help were attended to, and there was palpable relief and some smiling faces as they left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, who spearheads this community service, said "There are many people in Singapore who need legal advice but cannot afford it. I feel this Legal Clinic can help fill some of that gap." When asked how their Legal Clinic compared to similar ones out there, Jeannette said "Our Legal Clinic is open to all Singaporeans and the motivation behind this project is not political. Similar to clinics like the Criminal Legal Aid Scheme for example, ours is pro bono and aimed at serving the community."

The Legal Clinic runs every first Monday of the month and operates on a first come first served basis. For more information and details on how to register, please see the FAQ below. 

 

 

 

 

NSP COMMUNITY SERVICE – FREE LEGAL CLINIC FAQ

Eligibility

This community service by NSP is open to all Singapore Citizens who do not have the means to pay for legal advice. You do not need to be a member of NSP to consult with our Legal Clinic lawyers.

Services

The Legal Clinic provides registrants with a face-to-face consultation session with a qualified volunteer lawyer. No advice will be given over the telephone, via email or by correspondence.

The Legal Clinic

• Does not provide legal representation to carry out any legal action.

• Does not provide legal consultation for inquires relating to Criminal Offences and Business Law.

• May decline to provide consultation for areas of law which are outside the expertise of the attending volunteer lawyer.

Venue

Consultations will be held at the National Solidarity Party premises at No. 397, Jalan Besar, #02-01A, Singapore 209007.

Registration Process

As consultations are by appointment only and you can register for a consultation at the NSP’s Legal Clinic by sending your full name, NRIC number and a brief description of the legal inquiry to: [email protected]

 

You May Also Like

【选举】“中小企业已在加护病房” 朝野政党辩论解决危机之道

朝野政党今日在新传媒进行首场电视辩论。前进党蔡厝港集选区候选人阮健平、工人党盛港集选区候选人林志蔚、武吉巴督单选区候选人徐顺全,以及行动党武吉知马候选人维文,以英语针对本地就业、如何扶助企业以及促进社会流动性方面,提出看法。 阮健平形容,中小企业目前状况已形同在“加护病房”(ICU),而迫切需要有效的复苏政策;他也反问维文所谓10万就业机会的具体细节?因为数码大使等临时工也是工作,以及政府落实上述目标时限。 朝野政党也认同中小企业是国家经济的脊梁,阮健平认为,当前要解决失业率问题,理应着重国人就业优先;而民主党徐顺全也认同在疫情危机下,当有国人面对失业问题,应避免在引入外籍人才。至于维文则强调,行动党一直在关注的都是就业问题。 林志蔚:工人党多为国人、工友考量 不过,辩论后端,维文指自己也读了工人党的竞选宣言,却乘机暗讽工人党“像行动党”,指行动党也可以写出和工人党一样的宣言。 不过工人党候选人林志蔚也非省油的灯,也指该党不为反对而反对,再者大家是要正确能帮助到人民的政策。再者,该党宣言也是有根有据,都有统计考量。 “我觉得我们(与行动党)不同之处,在于我们考量权衡的地方不同,行动党可能比较倾向资本家,但我们则对每一分毫国家收入,都为国人、工友考量。” 至于维文则反驳徐顺全指责,行动党有意作“一千万人口”的规划,维文驳斥这是虚假声明。而徐顺全则强调有确有此事。他在辩论后在脸书发贴文,也指原副总理王瑞杰,曾引述“城市规划之父”刘太格在2014年曾提议,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。 “把辩论带入国会中” 另一方面,林志蔚在总结时强调,行动党总会得到他们想要的委托,但是此次选举的重要一点,不是拒绝让行动党得到委托,而是拒绝行动党的口头支票。 故此林志蔚认为,此次选举更关乎,能够把辩论不仅仅局限于类似今晚的论坛,而是能够带到国会中。如果人民相信人民的心声要被听见,需要理性、理智对政策议题的讨论,那更应该“让您的一票成就未来”,投给工人党。

Netizens slam OneMillion Tree Movement; urges government to proritise preservation of existing greenery

Highlighting Singapore’s title as one of the greenest cities in the word,…

【冠状病毒19】4月16日本地激增728例确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月16日中午2时,本地新增728例冠状病毒19确诊病例,其中多达654例来自住在客工宿舍的工作准证持有者。 此外,有26例是非住宿舍的客工,以及48例为社区感染病例。多达81巴仙的新增确诊,都与已知感染群有关。 本地累计确诊已增至4427例。累计治愈出院病例683例,仍有1886例仍在留院治疗,其中23名病重病患需待在加护病房。 至于1千848例康复良好,惟冠毒测试仍呈阳性反应者,则转移到本地社区隔离设施。本地累计死亡病例达10例。