By Dr James Gomez –

The ISA has scared Singaporean society at three fundamental levels.

At the first level it has scared the individuals directly arrested and detained. Years after their release, almost all remain traumatized and psychological scarred from the experience. It takes a life-time to break out of this experience. I am glad to note a change as more from this group have come forward.

At the second level immediate family members, friends, associates from work and members from social organizations (e.g. church, welfare group, the arts, etc. that those detained under the ISA belonged to), also bear the long-time psychological effects. The fear of having being so near to those arrested and detained also does have a bearing on how this immediate group interacted with others especially when it came to engaging in political matters critical of the PAP government. There is certainly less fear among them now.

At the third level, in the general body politic, it had scarred a whole nation into self-censorship. It prevented many for the longest time from taking an active stance in our domestic politics, leaving it to a few to lead the charge. Even today it is not unusual to evoke the comment that the “ISD is watching or listening” whenever we hear an electronic crackle over the telephone line or an audio interference over a PA system at a meeting. Yes we laugh it off, but it belies a deep psychological fear. That is extent of ISA’s scar on Singaporean society. But we now have come a long way.

Collectively, this scar also extends to foreigners and visitors to Singapore and how they have and continue to conduct themselves when it comes to speaking up on political injustices in Singapore or undertaking critical commentary. This the extents of the ISA’s psychological reach beyond our borders. I think to effect a change across the border would take a little bit longer as the ripple of change out of Singapore would need more time to travel.

Thus, 22 years ago when, I was an Arts and Social Science student in NUS I asked Lee Kuan Kew at the 1990 NUS Forum: Lee Kuan Yew on ISA and Marxist Conspiracy whether Singapore would consider abolishing the ISA given the region had become much more stable. I was not convinced of the answer.

Back then, those of us who spoke up against the ISA were few, now we are a little more and from all three levels. I am confident that together we can work to abolish the ISA.

 

Dr. James Gomez, a 3rd year undergrad at NUS in 1990, asked Lee Kuan Yew whether he would abolish the ISA.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

You May Also Like

Sembawang Park tree that injured 14 SMRT staff was due for inspection in May next year, says NParks

A fallen tree that led to the injury of 14 SMRT staff…

Vikram Nair clarifies the 60/40 story

It is a strange feeling to be confronted about something you were…

对比37国养老金机制 荷兰最佳狮城第七

评估全球退休保障计划的墨尔本美世全球养老金指数(Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index),公布今年排行榜。比较37国退休金机制,荷兰蝉联最佳养老金制度冠军宝座,至于新加坡排名第七。 根据报告,第二、第三名为丹麦和澳洲,其他进入前十名的国家分别是:芬兰、瑞典、挪威、新加坡、新西兰、加拿大以及智利。 荷兰以81分今年蝉联冠军,该国退休人士以职业生涯的平均收入为基础享有被评为最佳的养老金制度。 至于我国的中央公积金制度(CPF),总得分70.8分,获得B评级,即指具备一个健全的退休金机制,且具有许多优良的特色,惟“仍有值得改善之处”。 在简介中,该报告介绍中央公积金部分积蓄可提取用来购屋或医疗用途,其余仍作为退休存款;也提到终身入息计划(CPF Life)下须有最低存款额,以及调高会员动用退休储蓄的年龄。 报告指各国政经文教国情不同,固然不能把一国的制度照搬其他地方,惟都会有一些确保社会年长群体受惠、具有可持续性和更高的社会群体信心等特色。 该报告以三大主轴:是否充足(adequacy)(总分40分)、可持续性(…

Bus carrying foreign workers collides with car on Jurong Island highway

A bus carrying foreign workers collided with a car on Jurong Island…